Trump, DeSantis and other Republicans push antisemitic 'Soros' smear after Bragg indictment

That is why I love the fact that two of the biggest pro second amendment advocates are Allan Gottlieb of the Second Amendment Foundation and the "Jews for the Preservation of the Firearms Ownership" They can bash scum like Soros and Bloomberg and laugh when the reactionary wokers scream ANTI SEMITIC

 

What I find amusing is the Squad hates Israel and they support palestine and Iran who want to wipe that country off the map, but say something about Soros…

 

They do?

 

Because he's the most well-known example, a simple context that everyone understands what he's talking about. And in this case (as so many), the money trail goes directly to Soros. Why shouldn't he point directly at the source of the money and say its name?

 

This (OP) is the only example you've provided to support your claim, and it doesnt. Got any others, or u just blowing smoke?

 

The third option

 

My tongue was firmly planted in my cheek as I typed.

 

Yeah, that's what I'm saying-- people understand "what he's talking about"-- but that ain't liberalism. What-- you think George Soros is better-known than the A.C.L.U. (or even half as familiar to people)? That thinking of yours, actually, explains a lot. The ACLU is a much better defined image, providing "simple context," than is George Soros, at least to my mind. I think you will find that those with the "clearest" image of Soros, are predominantly those who buy into the whole rich, Jewish puppet master, conspiracy crap.

Not sure what you mean by "the money trail" to Bragg. You're saying that all the money from other social justice organizations, was somehow kept separate from Soros' contribution, which was earmarked, specifically, for Bragg? 'Cause that sounds like bullshit-- can you back it up, with a link?

 

What isn’t racist? What isn’t a dog whistle to a leftist

 

The 'Open Society' where this funding originates is Soros' own organization, founded and primary funded by Soros.

 

Soros is a lowlife scumbag regardless of whatever religion he claims to subscribe to. But I see the OP will defend such a scumbag if it fits the narrative.

Once again lefties accuse Republicans of what they themselves are doing. They claim Soros was "smeared" when the article and the OP are smearing Republicans.

 

How George Soros’ billions are remaking America’s justice system

Jason Johnson, the former deputy commissioner of the Baltimore Police Department, is president of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund. Sean Kennedy is LELDF’s policy director and a visiting fellow at the Maryland Public Policy Institute:

https://nypost.com/2022/06/08/how-george-soros-is-remaking-americas-justice-system/


:

 

Marion Berry was a crackhead.

The attacks on Soros started over 20 years ago from antisemites. Maybe people are just ignorant and are repeating antisemetic lines unwittingly, but that doesn't change where they came from.

People who attack Soros know nothing about him, everything they know came from right wing media, which came from anti-semites in Eastern Europe and got brought to the US by Alex Jones over 20 years ago.

 

Reds have an irrational fear for this 92 year old man. I wonder if they see that 92 year old man and woke in the same room with them everywhere they are? That would explain a ton. LOL

 

Rightfully so. The man rules the entire world and trump will never have his power.

 

So you want government to fund political campaigns. I want government to have nothing at all to do with political campaigns. Your idea is dangerous. Most of what federal government does now, is beyond its appropriate role and you want to add more. We really need to go in the other direction and fast. Some serious economic consequences of government spending are looming. We are already feeling the not-so-serious ones.

 

I can't stand the suspense. Please tell me how I, a regular citizen, can solve the problem or even work in that direction. I can't wait.

 

No, I want government to bring balance and doing so make endless funds contributions meaningless.

Why? Because it negates buying politicians?

That is debatable, but it is the role, no duty of government to ensure that society is functions in a just and fair way.

What direction is that? Power and justice to the highest bidder?

 

That's horseshit, there is NO proof of that.

 

Where were you when the Koch Brothers were buying up the Republican party.

 

But Trump's Wall was legitimate?

 

Not everyone is entitled to buy politicians, only the right.

 

Maybe you personally don't, but there is a history of many MAGA followers (even right here on this forum) who used the Wall as their rallying cry to project their bigotry and hate.

 

Your idea makes me pay for campaigns which I absolutely refuse to do.

The role of federal government is defined in the constitution. Those activities not defined there go to the states. Read the 10th amendment.

The direction of involving federal government in political campaigns. Horrible idea. Sorry.

 

That is a crock of crap.
I bet you agree with every single expenditure the government makes, moreover you prefer politicians bought.

Yes, I suggest you reread it, especially the very beginning.

No it is not. You seem to be confused about what is involvement.

Yet you have nothing better...