Fox News Poll: Voters favor gun limits over arming citizens to reduce gun violence

Since you have a need for an "extensive" collection.........yes.

 

Strawman of the week award. lol

 

Who cares. What difference does that make?

 

Is this a poll from before they fired Tucker or a poll of the people (who fell alseep with the TV on) that are still watching afterwards?

 

I wonder how many of those people you mention do not even live in the US?

 

about 19,000 dollars

 

we do have a bunch of non residents/non citizens who constantly bash Trump and whine about our gun laws. I remember when an NRA officer was called paranoid when he said that the international communist conspiracy wanted to disarm America. Hmmmm

 

so you just want to harass him since he owns guns. thanks for proving my point as to what motivates the gun banning posters

 

You did hide behind what is a misinterpretation of the 2nd Amendment that has only happened in the last 50 years. Up until them the NRA was for gun control.

 

Just looked up the cost of a transferable class 3 Thompson. A mere $75,000. Had a Mattel Thompson as a kid. Always thought I would have a real one someday. But not at $75,000.

 

A waiting period is "harassment"? Someone that has an "extensive collection" can't wait 30 days.!!!

 

Of course now we have this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party

"Authors of a paper published in 2017 in the American Political Science Review estimate that the Chinese government fabricates 488 million social media posts per year."

 

in 85 I could have bought a pristine one (the cheaper MI the did not have the cutts compensator on it or the ribbed barrel) for 4K. in 88 it was up to 15. An old gentleman who passed a couple years ago, worked at the range where I was on the pro shooting team-he had a top of the line Navy thompson-he bought it for 2K in the early 70s, sold it for 29K in 2017

 

you miss the point-what is the reason for making him wait. you seem to think laws should be judged on what harm they do to honest people vs what good do they do. WTF should he have to wait?

 

My question was how that makes you safer.

 

Not true.....at all about where they got them from. But they were criminals so they might have but citizens could buy them.....which is the point.

 

harassing people like you appears to be the main goal. I had a gun banner testify at a Cincinnati council meeting in 1988 or 89 that the main reason to have a three day waiting period was to kill off the gun shows held monthly at the Cincinnati Gardens (a once famous arena). I pointed out that the facility was outside the city limits which pretty much shut the clown up but we noted his real reasons

 

I could also say you missed the point. Why does anyone really need an extensive gun collection?

 

what? that makes no sense-there have been two cases in 80 years of a legally owned MG being used in a serious crime of violence and the only one I can find involved a POLICE OFFICER shooting an informant in Dayton after the ban

 

why do you need to post on this board? I don't play golf-why does Tiger woods need golf clubs? why do all the people who are never good enough to play professionally

control freaks want to tell others what they need. that alone is a good reason to be well armed

 

It's less time you have more guns.

 

that's so patently silly I am laughing. it's as stupid as saying a drunk driver with eight cars is more dangerous than one with seven. why don't you tell us why you really want to hassle him from getting another gun after he clearly has never misused the many he already has

 

I am specifically asking how that makes society safer.

 

The Constitution is amenable by design. Hop to it.

 

To educate people like you

Because that's how he makes his living. Do you make your living with your guns?

I don't Tiger Woods when, how or what he needs to play golf. Golf clubs intended purpose are not to kill. Do you think there are more golf clubs than people in the US?

THAT is some FU logic.