Trump or Biden?

what you seem to miss is that your claiming he tried to overthrow the government is about as realistic as cutting down the tallest tree in forest with a herring.

 

As Ive pointed out “conviction” isn’t required. An attorney would know that; not surprisingly you don’t.

 

actually claiming someone engaged in treason requires a higher standard of proof than the opinions of highly biased uneducated source

 

Your problem is tRaitor tRump didn’t use a herring. He used and betrayed the full force and power of the Presidency of The United States.

 

this might rate as the silliest bit of hyperbole I have seen

you still haven't told us what Trump actually did before the election that causes your level of unhinged hatred of the man

 

That would be you then, wouldn’t it? I looked it up.

 

No, no matter how much you wish it.

I’ve told you many times I don’t hate anyone, not even tRaitor tRump. Hate is a waste of time. Hate is the business of tRaitor tRump and his tRumpublicans.

 

oh come on-your venom towards Trump borders on whacko and you won't tel us how the big orange bad hair day hurt you?

 

That’s BULLSHIT!!!

 

Fix your C&P. "not" makes your sentence senseless.

 

Reading/listening to the talking points of MSM is getting old. Unless leftists expand what they read they will just continue to spout out what they are programmed to repeat. Empty rhetoric.

 

Apparently you figured it out.

 

I liked Bush. I liked many of his domestic policies. His “ compassionate conservative” may not alien with my liberal view but it was far more “compassionate” then the current conservatism. I agreed with Bush's Pre 9/11 foreign policy. I think Bush’s biggest mistake during his presidency was that he thought he can bring democracy to Arab Muslim.

 

I constantly and clearly state why I despise democrats in the white house and why I'd vote for road kill over Biden, I set forth the policies and areas that clearly affect me. you've done nothing of the same

 

Of course, but you're doing a C&P so it should be fixed.

 

No you don't you constantly and clearly post unsupported crap that amounts to nothing more than RW boiler plate tripe. And when you get called on it like I call you out on that list of nonsense I responded to you go round and round and end up attacking your challenger ... personally ... because your talking points are ^^^^^ BULLSHIT.

No, you rattle out RW de Jure and carp endlessly about the Second Amendment ... which is settled law.

And there it is another personal attack but, in fact I did challenge WITH SUBSTANCE everyone of your points and you've come back with nothing ... NOTHING ... but BULLSHIT personal attacks.

 

This isn't a writing class but thanks, I type to fast for my own good, sometimes. Point taken.

BTW I don't know what you mean by C&P, so if you're such a stickler for clarity spell out what you mean.

 

the irony of this garbage is hilarious-what is your argument against Trump other than conspiracy laden nonsense and false claims of treason. I have succinctly set forth the fact that Biden's judicial appointments are based on race and gender and have voted against gun rights. Biden keeps howling for gun bans, has let the border become a sieve and what do you do?

Howl tRAITOR and tRump without ever making even rudimentary logical arguments

 

well that is an interesting argument give Illinois ,NJ, Maryland have all imposed bans on commonly owned firearms that fly in the face of HELLER which is settled law while your dear leader have banogasms every time there is a mass shooting, whether an AR 15 was used or not

 

The irony is that you cannot support your position without personal attacks. In this case you tried to defend you falacious list for 1/2 a post before resorting to attacking the messenger. But then ran off the rails attacking me and my pejorative of calling tRaitor tRump ... tRaitor tRump; that's snowflake land you're living in.

Hell, you don't even remember what the argument is about. -sad

 

Take up with the States and the Tenth, not President Biden.

 

Copy and paste.

 

They don't understand the definition of insurrection even after the Supreme Court schooled them when explaining to them that only congress gets to decide such matters. They simply throw the big, bad sounding words out there and hope they stick.

 

Rachel Madcow gets the Dem's echo chamber riled up every single day.

 

That’s why I did understand your C&P criticism. I get you were trying to denigrate my reply as unoriginal thought. But, in this case it was typed by my own hands. You can almost always tell when I'm posting a quote or an article because it will have an accompanying citation.