Two and a half hour explaination of everthing Creationism.

Are you here to learn or are you just another creationist nut-job?

At 7:30 in the video, it shows you the beginning of Evolution.

PS: Abiogenesis is NOT Evolution and vice verse.

 

And why can these "adaptations" not eventually result in a new species?

 

Creationis nut-jobs are their finest:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZFG5PKw504&feature=related"]Peanut Butter, The Atheist's Nightmare! - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfv-Qn1M58I&feature=related"]Banana: The Athiests Nightmare. - YouTube[/ame]

 

Read further down where it talks about genetics. It is in my post. Typical cherry pick when you know you are wrong

 

No it shows a theory and his thought as to what happened not fact

Read post 49

 

Show examples of that happening. Why you are at it show the species that man and ape evolved from and the progression of each species to today

 

For starters, do you the difference between a scientific theory and a theory in laymen's terms?

 

Taken from another thread:

 

Can you perhaps quantify and precisely define "species" before answering that question. Are you perhaps an essentialist?

Homo sapiens is an Ape. A hairless, gracile and smart ape, but an ape nonetheless.

 

What is the difference between a scientific theory and just the common theory?

You may want to start learing what a scientific theory is to begin with.

 

Thanks for using me post.

I also learned that dolphin embrios have vestigital legs in the womb at one point in development. Isn't evolution great!

This video expands on the point about intermediate forms.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o92x6AvxCFg"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o92x6AvxCFg[/ame]

 

Totally wrong.

Take a look at ring species.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_species
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RnygS7opCA&feature=channel_video_title"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RnygS7opCA&feature=channel_video_title[/ame]

 

Who pays atom scientists?

 

Yes a scientific theory is a scientist claiming a fact till it is proven wrong. I gave a link that shows he is still trying to prove it. it is an opinion there is no proof that ever happened on earth

 

What animal did they come from or is this more opinions and assumptions

 

If that would be true why have some evolution theories been proven false

 

So what did they evolve from?

 

Great Wiki with no factual examples just what could happen

 

I don't know I did not know we were discussing them

 

Show examples of this happening? Sure.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/speciation.html

Just off the top of my head: the dog from the grey wolf, domesticated cattle from aurochs.

Why? Why is that necessary to accept evolution as a theory? Why do we require the exact fossil of the species from which man and other monkeys diverged from? The fossil record is complete, it isn't possible to dig up the entire Earth looking for one fossil, and believe it or not bones break down over time. We have a mountainous amount of evidence that evolution occurs and that yes, speciation occurs as well. The only division between macroevolution and microevolution is time itself.

 

Goodness GFP: That must be one hum-dinger of a question sitting there that caused such desperate rationalization and cross questioning regarding his acceptance of evolution as a theory. All he asked for was the name of the species that man and ape evolved from and the progression of each species to today. Can't you answer that simple little question?

 

Man is an ape.

And the development of humans is pretty well understood from an evolutionary pov, with fossils showing definite progressive development into the gracile creature we are today. Some fossils are fragmentary, and some are just never going to be available because of the nature of fossilisation and the available areas for searching. But the realities of fossilisation and evolution aren't accepted by those who have never actually bothered to learn about them.

What has been found in the human branch of the ape tree is completely consistent with the modern synthesis of the ToE. This isn't difficult information to come by, and any evolutionary biology course will teach you the basics if you actually want to learn them.

 

Science deals with probabilities, not facts.

Oh bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

RNA has been made in labs using simple chemiclas thought to be like the early Earth.

RNA world easier to make

And RNA that replicates itself indefinitely developed for first time


Again, are you here to learn or just another creationist nut-job who just evidence?

PS: Im still waiting for an answer on Human Chromosome 2.

 

It would be nice if you gave some links to support this, and no, a facebook page doesn't count.

A peer reviewed journal would be a good place to start, since 99.8% of biologist say The Theory of Evolution is true.

 

He got it from a uncredited Bible college.