Do You Believe In Racially Profiling Black "People?"

Yes, White people only allowed it to happen once. We put a stop to it because we're good people overall.

Black "people" are too stupid to get away with what Hitler did over a long period of time. But boy do they try... each and every year in every African country that exists. The Congo war alone has killed millions and millions of Congolese.

No, they had no choice.

Yes, your ignorance is funny, isn't it?

Then don't talk to me then! Go away. If you don't trust what I say, why are you continuing to debate with me? You make no sense.

Again, if you don't believe me there's no need to ever enter my threads again. What's the point?

I don't expect us to cross paths again. You don't believe what I say and I expect you have far better things to be doing then nitpicking what a fraud says.

Just for the record, it's pretty obvious who knows more about black "people" and their behavior out of me and you. You sound like you could count the number of black "people" you've met on one hand.

 

Not just white people. America was far less white than Europe. White nations (plural) have been spanked by multi-racial America. They failed to resist our invasion of their homelands.

They are lucky that we did not have nukes at the time or the Fatherland could be a glowing crater by now.

Maybe they just arent as evil as white people are. Why is that not a possibility?

Because we took that choice away from them.

It isnt always about you. I am just commenting on your posts and exposing the flaws in your arguments. This is a public forum. I'm not pointing that out just for your benefit, LOL.

I am not debating you, I am debating your argument. If I were debating you alone I would be doing so through private mail instead of on a public forum.

To highlight the flaws in your arguments for the benefit of other people who might read them on here.

The only way that will happen is if you stop posting on here, heh heh

I think we can agree on that at least.

 

It’s quite obvious, based on your numerous post regarding African Americans, that you’ve had serious negative experiences. For that I can only say, it’s unfortunate that you’ve encountered these experiences. But to indict an entire race of people based your experiences and Google Links is truly an indictment of society and yourself. Thankfully, this type of blanket thinking is mostly generational and temporary and sadly and slowly perishing from this earth.

Therefore I can say with great glee, better days are ahead.

 

Progressive leftist central planners already systemically profile Blacks as "victims" who require better than equal rights and opportunity to navigate life....

yet...

far more often than not....

these same duplicitous frauds are not only the first to cry foul on profiling race as it pertains to criminality...
their complicit media actively attempts to obfuscate the race of black perpetrators in crime reports.

(Ironically, progressives will label anyone who illuminates this uncomfortable truth "racist")

 

I voted no. I admit it. Despite the fact I don't believe black people exist. Neither do white people, red people, yellow people or even green people.

We are all just people. We may have different skin tones, different environment upbringings and different cultures but people are all the same. The only profiling I make is if the person behaviour is treating towards me or not.

 

Pretty much. The concept of "race" is a social construct and entirely arbitrary.

 

Obviously not.

This is America, and one has the presumption of innocence. Until one gives an indication of doing something illegal, they should be free to do as they choose.

 

I believe racial profiling should be used wherever it will help. However, I supect profiling for white trash on meth in rural Oklahoma would be more effective than profiling "black people".

By the same token, I think profiling for white trash on meth in Compton wouldn't be very bright, either.

All that said, it is fact that blacks are per capita more violent than white people. While there are those who say mentioning such facts constitutes racism, I've seen none who can make the case as to why. It seems with many race-baiters, a simple accusation suffices. No actual evidence is necessary.

 

Who are you trying to kid? White Americans decided to end Hitler's plans. No one else.

Because it isn't. A new black Hitler tries to recreate World War II in Africa each and every year, but due to lack of intelligence, power and advanced weaponry only manages to kill a fraction that Hitler did. However, you add up the death toll from all these African dictators from the day Hitler started WW II till today and the tally would be monstrous.

Your precious black dictators are every bit as evil as Hitler was.

Well, okay...

My argument is that I've grown up and spent the vast majority of my life living in black majority neighborhoods on both sides of the Atlantic my entire life which is the reason I can't stand black "people." If you disbelieve that, then not only is that an easy option to take, it's also nonsensical as to why you continue debating me or my argument. I have no reason to lie about this as I'm certainly not proud to be brought up around the dregs of society and it also explains my utter disdain for black "people." You don't look in from majority White Billings, Montana having never met black "people" and decide to hate them. There's got to be some sort of interaction with blacks in order to form such an extreme opinion about them.

I must say it's a very childish and immature angle to say "oh well you're probably lying" to counter one of my points. It's quite a cowardly, easy way out of an argument.

I couldn't care less if you carry on posting at me. You're the one who's suggesting I'm a fraud, so all I'm saying is there's no real point from your benefit. It must be a waste of your time. Do you enjoy wasting your time?

We sure can.

 

Guys ... the race thing is getting old.

 

Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm... then why would racially profiling White trash on meth be "more effective" than profiling ghetto trash beating, raping and murdering innocent women?

 

well .... do you ?

Because I'm sure you have the Statistics

 

Who is doing the profiling?

 

Are you trying to make the claim that only white people existed in our military at that time? Or that only white people were paying taxes and voting?

LOL! Great answer.

What makes you think I believe they are precious? Presume much?

That argument is based entirely on your own claims on here, which may or may not be true. We have no way of knowing. We cannot verify that claim.

Obviously, you would have an incentive to lie or exaggerate. That is why your claim is almost worthless as evidence of anything.

I already explained in post #52 why I continue to respond.

LOL...why is that? You've made your hatred pretty obvious. You have a huge incentive to lie.

I am crushed that an anonymous user on a political forum on the internet thinks I am immature and childish. Really. Dont let my mocking laughter fool you.

Not just you. I'd say the same thing to anyone trying to project anecdotal experiences as equivalent to real evidence. It really is nothing personal.

 

Like I said, I think it depends on where you're doing the profiling. Obviously, in Compton and South Central LA, profiling black thugs will be far more effective.

Or perhaps I don't understand your disagreement with what I said earlier.

 

No, I'm making the claim that it was White peoples decision and ultimate actions that put a stop to it. And it's a valid claim.

Yes, it sure is. Especially when you don't take a tiny excerpt out of my entire rebuttal. That's what a child would do. Here's my rebuttal in full.

Nice try though...

You act like you do. You talk as if they're angels. That's why you're coming off as unrealistic.

Okay... so?

Now what?

Yeah, it makes no sense.

And what incentive would that be?

Okay... so?

Now what?

Oh okay... great.

So?

Now what?

I have to ask... why do you keep responding to me? Why even engage in discussion with me to begin with? I see no point with your attitude.

You have nothing of substance to type and you're typing it too often. It's really quite boring...

 

Nope. The only terrorists against this nation were Saudi Arabians..and how did our president respond to this hostile nation?

 

Are you sure you're in the right thread?

 

I vote we profile men since they commit 90% 0f murders ...

although come to think of it .. there has been a massive increase int he amoubt of violent crime committed by women in the last few decades - maybe we should prfile women as well.

we could profile people who live in smaller towns, as these are oftem more at risk of familicide ....

or we could target christian men who have a strong religious upbringing as these are more likely to be serial sex killers.

http://home.comcast.net/~pobrien48/serial_killers.htm

 

I think I misread your initial post. You're talking about profiling Whites in rural Oklahoma would be more useful than profiling blacks... of which there are hardly any, right? I missed the rural Oklahoma bit, apologies.

You make some good points, but the part of your first post I highlighted in red would suggest that you believe racially profiling blacks in a 50% White/50% black city/neighborhood is something that should be done? Blacks are obviously far more violent than Whites to even the most dim-witted anti-racist, so racially profiling them where ever there's a significant amount of them is only sensible, right?

 

No, it's all about majorities. It's only sensible to profile the majority that is doing all the crime. We do profile men... it's sensible and accurate... why do we have such a problem profiling blacks?

 

I thought it talked about being right to profile blacks...they were not involved in terrorism..why would they be profiled?

 

Because of the violent black crime epidemic sweeping the nation. Is it right to profile black men after some poor innocent woman was just kidnapped, gang-raped and brutally murdered in some abandoned house?

 

maybe you should profile poor people.

european history shows that over the last 800 years there is an increase in violent crime during periods of economic instability, when there is an increase in poverty.

you could also profile people who buy large quantities of alcohol.

consumption of large amounts of alcohol is often linked to violence.

 

Because that'd be pointless. The NBA & NFL is full of mega rich black "men" who are nothing but violent thugs and criminals.