Newt's ex wife drops interview bomb

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by theunbubba, Jan 19, 2012.

  1. Kabuki Joe

    Kabuki Joe New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,603
    Likes Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0

    ...I don't like Newt because he's a conservative, I like Newt because he makes sence...I'd even like Newt if he was a liberal to be honest...


    Kabuki Joe
     
  2. driller80545

    driller80545 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    503
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah, believe Newt. That's why they threw him out of the congress, for being so trustworthy. He is good for America. A real savoir. You can bet he would come out of the presidency power mad and filthy rich, though.
     
  3. Wildjoker5

    Wildjoker5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,237
    Likes Received:
    4,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Guess then it is a good thing that he is huh?
     
  4. theunbubba

    theunbubba Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    17,889
    Likes Received:
    307
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You're not the only one. I bet he turns around and endorses Obama.
     
  5. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If there's one huge problem with Repuiblicans in Congress it's that
    they have a knee-jerk tendency to clean house.That they manage their
    own with almost ruthlessness.They don't tolerate anyone in their ranks
    embarassing the Party and therefore they purge anyone who appears
    to have disgraced the party.Like what happened to Dennis Hastert who
    was blamed for the Foley/page scandal for not being on top of it.
    For Trent Lott and his casual disregard for not using caution about
    talking about those Dixiecrats.
    In short Republicans play by a different set of rules than democrats.
    You'll never find a Republican caught kicking & screaming and insisting
    they stay on the job,as Democrats ALWAYS do.
    Republicans leave or step down.
     
  6. MisLed

    MisLed New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    7,299
    Likes Received:
    329
    Trophy Points:
    0
    how would that be different? Are you only opposed to republicans making money? but not democrats. Do you know what obama is worth now? does it make you glad to know that he and Michelle Antoinette are living high on the hog at our expense.

    Newt wouldn't make any money. The left leaning vindictive media would be on his case every minute of the day and night.

    but i'll tell you one way he'd be different from what we are cursed with right now. he'd do things for the BENEFIT of this country. he wouldn't be apologizing around the world...OR BOWING to the enemy. or giving in to Islamist terrorist gov'ts. like this jackwagon who is squatting in our WH.
     
  7. AshenLady

    AshenLady New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    5,555
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Pfffftttt.....Mr. family values???:puke:
     
  8. Goldwater

    Goldwater Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,825
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    You do know that just because Newt used his applauding home town minions at the debate to muscle CNN into dropping the question....it won't stop the media from keeping the issue alive till November...don't you?

    The people at that debate last night don't matter, because they'll vote Republican no matter what happens before November. The media and the DNC strategists will paint Newt as an adulterer, and an indiscriminate unprincipled lobbyist, and he's gonna have problems with independents and Democrats discouraged by Obama, and those are the votes he needs to win
     
  9. Wildjoker5

    Wildjoker5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,237
    Likes Received:
    4,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe when he is talking, you should **** and listen to what he is saying. He has NEVER said he supports Iran. Nor does he support any of their actions that they have taken. He does how ever try to educate you on the fact that we have done things to them over and over again FIRST and they are just choosing to retaliate. It is called introspective, and getting a little will show you how America is not always a shining beacon of light for everyone. Starting with the native Americans, then blacks, then Asians, then Irish, then homosexuals, then Germans, then Italians, then Japanese, then Muslims. It just doesn't stop when you are always saying it is other peoples fault.

    And BTW, Ron would take care of Iran the same way Thamas Jefferson did, send in the troops, kill those that have declared war, and ****, like our CONSTITUTION prescribes.
     
  10. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well then Independents are Schmucks.They are incapable of learning.
    They have a Political lanscape right under their noses and they can't
    smell the coffee.Even drawing a picture might not help when a gaggle
    of schmucks like these Independents hit town.They're like those
    crazed,drunken conventioneers who clog up the best hotel in town
    and turn into a - Hostel - almost overnight.
     
  11. drpepper

    drpepper New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,979
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    frankly, having your daughters say she didn't say it is not the saem as denying it.

    frankly, thay wouldn't know either way so he was pathetic for using his kids that way. frankly, saying his friends said he didn't do that is also pathetic. Frankly, how would they know?

    Frankly, can he name any gay married couples that ruined the sanctity of his failed marriages?

    frnakly?
     
  12. homerjay_s

    homerjay_s New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    5,553
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You got me, Joe. I am a secret Obama supporter. My support of Ron Paul is just a clever rouse so I can get into threads and talk negative about Republicans. Newt Gingrich never even cheated on any of his wives. He never was sanctioned by the house ethics committee. He doesn't have any moral ambiguity at all. I'm just that good.

    We all know its impossible to be opposed to the Democrats AND the Republicans, too. We HAVE to align with one party or the other. It's written into our DNA.

    In all seriousness, though, I suggest you stop focusing so much on the party you love to hate and start looking at the party you blindly support and ask yourself why it is that you are so willing to disregard their lack of morals, their hypocrisy and their penchant for doing the exact opposite of what they claim to stand for. Ask yourself why they need a propaganda wing to promote talking points over and over again so that their followers believe degraded weapons left over from the Iran-Iraq war amount to the WMD their leaders claimed they not only knew existed, but where they were, in order to con us into an unnecessary invasion and.occupation of a foreign country to the tune of hundreds of billions of tax payer dollars being transfered to their corporate overlords.

    Is it not possible that I can oppose both parties? Is it not possible that you are only questioning tat position because deep down you know what I say about the party you chose to follow is accurate?
     
    catalinacat and (deleted member) like this.
  13. homerjay_s

    homerjay_s New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    5,553
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Or, maybe it's the blind party followers that are the schmucks, refusing to see the holes in their sinking ship, and telling the people on life rafts that they are a gaggle of schmucks for refusing to get back on board.
     
  14. Goldwater

    Goldwater Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,825
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Not sure it's that cut n' dry...

    IMO there are two kinds of independents.

    1. People who actualy think outside of what the media tells them.

    2. People who don't care, and just vote based on the last 5 word slogan they heard about one of the candidates
     
  15. homerjay_s

    homerjay_s New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    5,553
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    *MOD EDIT*

    The party you worship is a caricature of the ideals you believe it stands for. Supporting the Republican party is supporting big government. There ate no two ways about it.
     
  16. GoSlash27

    GoSlash27 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2008
    Messages:
    5,871
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you folks don't settle down, I'll turn this thread around and then nobody will get to go to Disney World.
    /Back on topic...
     
  17. HillBilly

    HillBilly New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Messages:
    4,692
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    0

    :mrgreen: well now MisLed , that may be true ...

    or

    maybe the Republicans been screwing everyone for so long they just can't help themselves , politically speaking , of course . :buggered:
     
  18. catalinacat

    catalinacat Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    6,922
    Likes Received:
    1,689
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    No worries, because Newt is the only one that will guarantee an Obama win.

    No offense to anyone, but the mancrushes on Newtie by all the men is a losing offence for beating Obama. They give standing ovations for a serial cheater that has already left two wives, and who pushed through NAFTA that outsourced millions of jobs overseas when he was speaker.:mrgreen:

    Cain had to withdraw, because they said we can't vote for him because he was a big cheat, let's see, 15-20 years ago. Cain never left his wives when they were ill, but he has to withdraw in shame.
     
  19. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,321
    Likes Received:
    38,993
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well the MSM does, the Democrat Party does, the left does. He is admired and treated with respect and even mentioned for a Supreme Court nomination.

    As long as that is the case there is not ground from which to criticize Newt Gingrich.

    No it is perfectly relevant unless we are just going to use such issues against Republicans only.

    The standard was set then, I am the first to admit I lost the argument then and Clinton was elected, reelected and not forced from office for transgressions that make Newts pale. And to this day it is verboten to even mention them, the press never ask him about them, stories of his presidency gloss over them and usually engage in the smears of those who would have held him accountable.

    Well the same standard should apply to Gingrich.

    So far it is conjecture.

    And that is not a truth but an opinion.

    The threat Saddam posed was fully spelled out in 1998 when you lost this argument. It was upheld by all the activities we proved he was engaged in and what his plans were along with all the WMD materials and proscribed items we found. For instance how do you explain away the cache's of 55 gallon drums of highly concentrated, highly toxic organophosphates we found in hidden underground bunkers at his guarded ammo dumps stored close to empty, new chemical weapons shells? All undeclared and hidden from the inspections.
     
  20. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,321
    Likes Received:
    38,993
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Just like the Democrats do Clinton to which we can add, sexual assaulter of subordinate employees and perjurer in a federal court and federal gran jury.
     
  21. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,321
    Likes Received:
    38,993
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    So you didn't listen to him and now you are fallacious saying he didn't deny it.

    Don't you think you should at least make sure before you make such statements of fact?

    Now wipe the egg off your face and go listen to a video of the debate last night.
     
  22. marbro

    marbro New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,581
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Its hard to believe the words of a cheat and liar.
     
  23. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,321
    Likes Received:
    38,993
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    According to friends of the family it's hard to believe the words of the scorned woman.

    And without absolute proof no one should engage in character smear, especially when it's not suppose to matter anymore...............Bill Clinton. I don't see the Democrats having any problems believing him and looking to him for leadership.
     
  24. catalinacat

    catalinacat Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    6,922
    Likes Received:
    1,689
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    No, the friends don't know what went down between him and his wife, only what they were told. But by all means, believe their 'friends', not the ex-wife.

    Everyone believed the women that accused Cain evidently. He went down in flames.:mrgreen:
     
  25. homerjay_s

    homerjay_s New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    5,553
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No matter how much you want it to be, this isn't a thread about Bill Clinton's well known sexual indiscretions, which I admit are a testament to Bill Clinton's utter lack of moral character.

    This is a thread about Newt Gingrich and his quite apparent and virtually undeniable lack of moral character. No matter how many times you reference Bill Clinton, Newt Gingrich's moral character will remain in question.

    As to your diatribe about resolutions from 1998, none of that changes the fact the Rick Santorum and Pete Hoekstra embarrassingly stood on the floor in the Capitol and declared they had found the WMD's that never were found, when all they had were a pile of old degraded mustard gas shells left over from the Iran-Iraq war. No amount of back tracking, distracting, nor twisting on your part will make those amount to be evidence of anything worth justification for invasion and the transfer of hundreds of billions of tax payer dollars to private interests.

    Santorum is a joke...don't believe so, just google his last name. Not opinion...fact. A living breathing joke...just like the notion that Newt Gingrich has moral character.
     

Share This Page