Still playing dodgeball, bob?
No one is asking for an apology. Just admit you were wrong. (I bet you'll demand something first - you aren't...
Your claim was proven incorrect and you failed to acknowledge it. Very dishonest, bob.
You made a claim and he proved you wrong. Will you admit to your own error?
Speculation. Show your math, back up your claim.
WTC7's collapse was chaotic. Wildly so.
Argument from incredulity and you didn't answer the question.
Bump for bob to explain his case.
Bump for bob to show his math.
Which has nothing to do with the premise. Nice try at avoiding debate, though.
That's a huge jump, even for you.
He already has. Pay attention.
And the evidence supports our point of view.
NIST never made that statement. You know this, you have been shown.
The above statement is false and quite misleading. try again.
When you begin your argument from a false premise, all that follows is meaningless.
Argument from incredulity. No evidence to back up your claim.
If only you had evidence instead of wild speculation.
What happened on 9/11/01 was not.
So, by the logic of the sentence above: you don't believe the mainstream media was lying. Words mean things, bob.
Evidence. Got any?
If one had evidence to back up their speculative fantasies, one might have hope.
The air temperature had nothing to do with the collapse, either. So ... you admit all of his premises are false ones?
Separate names with a comma.