Modern mainstream neoclassical economics is most definitely a hoax. It is a thoroughly fake science with no empirical validity, and no ability to...
Neoclassical economics, and it is still in full vigor.
No, because the 97% figure is also a bald falsehood.
No, far from all. I told you that was one of the false claims that, on form, I expected you to make.
Snarky out of spite...?
Unlike CO2's effect on global surface temperature or acid rain, smog is something people can experience themselves, with their own senses. They...
And the anti-fossil-fuel narrative has only got weaker. There is no contradiction there. You are just makin' $#!+ up. Garbage. As we see in...
Right. And there are lots of different kinds of empirical data, of widely diverse types and qualities, both direct and proxy, treated in various...
I've read hundreds of sources to obtain the information that informs my views on climate, maybe thousands. It's absurd to ask me to post them....
I used YOUR sources! They also get their information from "somewhere." I am not in the habit of providing sources for every fact I use because...
Those are two slightly different things. The prime rate is the rate at which private commercial banks can borrow reserves from the central bank...
In your opinion. I have posted sources many times, in many threads. Usually these discussions take place in the environment and conservation...
No they aren't. YOUR OWN SOURCE -- which you evidently did not bother reading -- shows that the rate of increase was highest ~10-15 years ago,...
That claim is false. I have identified the relevant facts, and you have not refuted any of them.
I've found plenty of it, with hardly any effort: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00382-021-05626-x...
Right. As I, Jack, tommy, and others here do. Except the climategate emails, the unedited IPCC reports, etc.... But not the scientists who...
Yes it most certainly is, at least up to the level of typical interglacial maxima. No, that claim is just baldly false. That's also just baldly...
Silliness with no basis in scientific fact. No, much cheaper to ignore silly scaremongering about an apocalypse that is moving so slowly it stopped.
Correct. Which means the apocalyptic scare narrative is dishonest nonscience. That is nothing but absurd, anti-scientific scaremongering with no...
Correct: they are contributing a modest but significant improvement -- perhaps +0.3C -- to the earth's climate. I don't know whom you are asking,...
Now all that's missing is the explanation of how that skyrocketing CO2 will cause global catastrophe rather than just faster plant growth and...
There is nothing in basic science to support the anti-fossil-fuel scare narrative, which is reliant on absurd contrivances that defy known...
Indeed. They are rising at the same rate they have been for hundreds of years. So, in what you are no doubt pleased to call your "mind,"...
Like the Second Coming...?
Their "science" is politically motivated trash. That CO2 is the principal factor governing the earth's surface temperature. Because I know what...
Separate names with a comma.
