I referred to the movement of the flag as fluttering but we can call it whatever you want. You still haven't explained the force you think is...
Anyone who looks at the video will see that it flutters (post #30). You're really getting desperate if you're going to start denying the obvious.
This does not explain the force that makes it flutter. If you maintain that the flag being pulled through water is not what makes it flutter,...
Translation: It's so clear that the flag is being dragged through water that I'll just end up looking silly if I try to obfuscate this anomaly so...
An objective truth-seeker who believed there was a force different from it's being dragged through water causing the fluttering would simple...
You're tap dancing around my question. If the flag is not fluttering because it's being dragged through water, what is the force that's making it...
Go back and look at post #30. I didn't mention the footage having been sped up. Just tell us what the force is that makes it flutter.
If you know, tell us. Is it a secret? I don't know where the post is where you addressed this. Please link to it if you're not going to explain it.
I asked you to explain what the force that made the flag flutter was. The only force that I can identify is its traveling through some kind of...
My position is that you lose because of post #41. The viewers can decide form themselves.
The material is stiffer. There's also the factor of different speed of water flow over the flag. It's an anomaly because the only identifiable...
Explain the force that's making the flag flutter. I say it's the same force that's making these flags flutter. USS Spiegle Grove Dive 1 - USA...
You refuse to address this anomaly directly because you know that the movement of the flag is impossible in a vacuum. It's so obvious that water...
If you're not checkmated, address this directly right now. (from post #30)
If you refuse to address what I call a clear anomaly, all I can say is Checkmate. Objective truth-seekers don't get checkmated. They modify...
You can pretend all you want. That anomaly is so clear that you can't try to obfuscate it without looking silly so you're tap dancing around...
For someone who never uses the scientific method* and just rants, you sure do have an attitude. *...
You can pretend all you want. Post #41 closes the whole case.
When I said that I was referring to this post....
You're dodging the issue because it has you checkmated. In that request that you analyze an alleged anomaly I said nothing about sped up footage....
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/reflector.575434/page-2#post-1072472797
deleted wrong thread
Knee-jerk dismissal is not the scientific method*. *...
You also said that the Chinese spacewalk was real in spite of the clear proof that it was faked in a water tank....
I invited some posters in the science section to come over to this thread to continue the discussion in the proper section....
Separate names with a comma.
