Wrong. You need to keep up to date. Numerous "oath keepers" have been charged with conspiracy.
Breaking and entering and physical violence are not part of your 1st amendment rights. If Trump was aware of the break-in plan in advance, he...
Doesn't matter. If Trump was aware of the plan for a Capitol break-in, he's a co-conspirator.
And, was cleared of wrong-doing by a police review board.
I think it more probable than not that he was a go-between the Oath Keepers (many of whom are under investigation and/or have been charged with...
No President likes to give-up power to another branch, which is exactly what the War Powers Act of 1973 does. Nixon tried to veto it and the veto...
I've answered this once. The War Powers Act does not specify nuclear weapons, but refers too all hostilities. The think tank you are quoting is...
That's your conclusion, not mine. Stone apparently gave two or three rally speeches on January 5th.
No. Stone was in Washington D.C. the day of the rally. He was videotaped standing with a group of Oath Keepers outside of his hotel, on January...
Yes, the War Powers Act DOES APPLY and limits the actions the President may take under his "emergency powers" to DEFENSIVE actions only.
Most of the rest of the world was concerned with the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol. Our government's job (including Milley's)...
Stone was at the rally. There is video of him standing outside of his hotel with his Oath Keeper bodyguards. "Process crimes" are bonafide...
No it does not. I quoted the portion of the law that applies. And, yes, a law may prevent a presidential first strike order. Military officers...
There were a number of convictions on various charges. Paul Manafort and Roger Stone come to mind. Were it not for Trump's pardons, both would...
That case could also be reopened.
I condemn all violence and destruction by anyone left or right. Trump incited the Capitol break-in, by asking the crowd to demand Pence break...
I explained this to you once. The War Powers Act does not specifically mention nuclear weapons. It simply excludes unprovoked initial hostile...
That's just his supporters bragging.
Do you know what that means? It's a law.
Read your own links. It says there is nothing SPECIFICALLY related to nuclear weapons that would prevent the President from a first strike with...
No...he said he'd do that, but then chickened out and went to the White House to watch it on TV.
You must have missed it. He held the rally that led to the Capitol break-in and riot.
Sorry...launching a nuclear war against another country without provocation would be illegal.
A nuclear attack on another country would be considered "introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities."
No...U.S. military officers take their oath's of allegiance to the Constitution, not the President. And, they are bound to follow only lawful...
Separate names with a comma.
