‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane, government dupes crazy and hostile

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Nov 25, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually, they did no such thing. If you wish to claim "free fall speed" then you really don't what you're taking about. You're big on making claims but, small on back them up.
     
  2. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, Brother Johnson. You DIDN'T see what you saw. Remember that cause, it's very critical to the "official" BS story.
     
  3. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So, you didnt see debris falling faster than the WTC Towers??? You want to hang your hat on that one???
     
  4. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I saw a controlled demolition in WTC7, that looked like every other controlled demolition I've ever seen or found on the web in video form. In WTC's 1 and 2, I saw more controlled demolition. Vertical steel columns don't just 'get out of the way' on their own.
     
  5. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Exactly. Vertical steel columns have to be taken out for a building to fall. To fall at or near freefall then all the core columns must be taken out at precisely the same time. All three WTC buildings were controlled demolition. Building 7 looks like a typical controlled demolition. The towers look to me like they are being exploded. I don't know how they did it but buildings just do not fall down from fires.
     
  6. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In an hour or so, to boot, and from the TOP down, on 1 and 2. How many vertical steel columns just "got out of the way" at near free fall speeds exactly? Definitely explosives on 1 and 2, all the way down. 7? They did that the more "traditional" way, from the bottom down into itself.
     
  7. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Very Freudian. :roflol:
     
  8. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Really?...so you have seen controlled demolition begin at the top of the building? Where?
    What was explosive material was used?

    - - - Updated - - -

    ..and you think, the 20 floors collapsing should have been stopped by the floors immediately below the area damaged by the plane crash? How's that work?
     
  9. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's only fair,sigmund,you keep telling us WE didn't see what we saw,CONSTANTLY
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "Brother Johnson" still isn't sure he saw planes hit the buildings. Keep up the cheerleading!
     
  11. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Various fire departments are laughing at the ridiculous statement above
     
  12. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    83,662
    Likes Received:
    9,826
    Trophy Points:
    113

    and yet, the all-steel section of the Windsor Tower in Madrid, collapse JUST due to fire.

    no plane impact damage.

    no damage due to force of exploding jet fuel.

    just fire.
     
  13. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    83,662
    Likes Received:
    9,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the most important and experienced Civil Engineering and Architectual organizations and agencies in the USA and the World, all agree that the WTC fell due to plane impact damage, fire, weakened steel, and gravity.

    - - - Updated - - -

    no laws of physics were broken by the collapses of the WTC.
     
  14. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    38
    When a truther says the laws of physics were broken, what he means is his failed understanding of the laws of physics were broken.
     
  15. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    83,662
    Likes Received:
    9,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    some buildings simply collapse due to age.
     
  16. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    83,662
    Likes Received:
    9,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    didn't you hear?

    70 floors has more mass than 30 floors, so the 70 floors should stop the collapse of the 30 floors, right in its tracks.

    :)
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,437
    Likes Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    83
    you mean to tell us 20 floors globally collapsed, like a demolition? No really?

    [​IMG]

    dont you look intelligent now

    - - - Updated - - -

    what speed is freefall speed?
     
  18. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    >>>MOD EDIT: INSULT<<< I wrote that NIST claims that Newton's laws of motion were violated. I deny that laws of nature can be violated by men. That is the whole problem with the NIST report. They publish a paper, of middle school level writing, stating that the laws of physics were violated. That is why 2000+ professional building experts are calling them out on their lies. Watch for yourself,
    MOD EDIT>>>SPAMMING <<<
     
  19. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Back from time served?

    No, 1 floor failed and the immediate floor above began the collapse. Kinda what happens when a plane crashes into a building and damages a number of support columns.
     
  20. jafc

    jafc Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    What does that gif prove exactly.
     
  21. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL... if you don't know then maybe you should revisit 7th grade physics class.
     
  22. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0

    "physics"

    19789999.jpg
     
  23. djlunacee

    djlunacee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You should stop trying to apply 7th grade physics to something much more advanced.
     
  24. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  25. djlunacee

    djlunacee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page