12 months in prison for putting a noose under a carport

Discussion in 'Law & Justice' started by kazenatsu, Jul 10, 2017.

  1. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,682
    Likes Received:
    11,249
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This happened six and a half years ago but I just found out about it and think it's kind of outrageous.

    Man gets 12 months for a noose
    Posted: November 5, 2010


    MONROE, La. - United States Attorney Stephanie A. Finley and Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez announced today that Robert Jackson, 37, of Ruston, Louisiana, was sentenced to 12 months in federal prison for placing a hangman's noose under the carport of the home of a Honduran immigrant who moved to Ruston from New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

    Jackson was also sentenced to one year of supervised release upon his release from prison and ordered to attend anger management and culture diversity programs.


    He was charged with "violating the Fair Housing Act by intimidating and interfering with another’s housing rights because of race".


    The link to the original article no longer works but there are some sources here:
    https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/ne.../no062410c.htm
    https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/ne.../no110510a.htm


    First I have some questions about whether this is even Constitutionally appropriate. Isn't the state supposed to handle these type of matters? So why is a federal court prosecuting him for what is basically a domestic dispute?

    It's not like this man even "broke and entered" either, he just stepped onto his neighbor's property and tied a little piece of rope under an open car shelter. Seems more like the federal government trying to go after people for racism.
     
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2017
  2. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IMO, it isn't.

    Correct, in accordance with the 10th Amendment.

    Because the (in)justice industry is hugely profitable and the feds want a piece of the action.

    The sentence is also far in excess of the "crime". Although one could make a case that it was a death threat, racist and caused psychological harm, at the end of the day no one was physically harmed. The sentence (as a first time offense) should not have exceeded 30 days.

    The (in)justice system does not have over 2.3 million people (more than any other nation on the planet, including China) behind bars and another 7+ million in the system (parole and probation) for no reason. It's all about $$$$$, not justice.
     
    Diablo likes this.
  3. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,682
    Likes Received:
    11,249
    Trophy Points:
    113
    a related story:

    A University of Illinois student was charged with a hate crime on Tuesday for allegedly placing a noose in a campus residence hall.

    Andrew Smith, a 19-year-old sophomore, was charged with misdemeanor disorderly conduct and committing a hate crime, which is a felony, after students found a noose hanging inside an elevator over the weekend, according to university police.​

    https://abcnews.go.com/US/illinois-...ed-hate-crime-placing-noose/story?id=65371709 (September 3, 2019 )
     
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2019
  4. Diablo

    Diablo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2016
    Messages:
    2,791
    Likes Received:
    2,328
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    My bold. I've long thought that this is the case.
     
    Mr_Truth likes this.

Share This Page