5 dead, 16 hospitalized in mass shooting at Highland Park 4th of July parade, shooter being sought

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Andrew Jackson, Jul 4, 2022.

  1. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
  2. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Out of curiosity where did you read the first italicized quote?

    I agree 4473 records “belong” to the FFL. They are regularly inspected by ATF agents with the authority to inspect any snd all aspects of the business of the FFL, not just 4473s.

    As I previously showed, if law enforcement (cops, sheriff, state patrol) want 4473 information pertaining to a crime they go through the ATF to get it. And the FFL has no more than 24 bourse to supply the requested information. The ATF is always the middle man.

    I’m not sure why the ATF inspector would wish to remove records from the FFL. I also don’t know if a federal judge would grant a warrant to do so. Good question but I’ve never heard of it even theoretically.

    But the ATF can inspect 4473 records at any time during business hour unannounced.

    So short answer—

    The ATF can inspect records on -site at their demand. If not allowed into the business they will terminate the FFL.

    If they wish to remove all the 4473 records I have no idea. Certainly there would have to be a reason like gross non compliance of the FFL and I would guess a federal judge might issue a warrant? Not sure at all on the warrant.


    My original point to Chris was that all information about the movement of the firearm through the supply chain is easily accessible as is the information on the 4473. The 4473 info requests must go through the ATF and FFL though.
     
    chris155au likes this.
  3. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It appears he is talking about removal of records from an FFL. Access to the information contained in the 4473 does not require any warrant.

    Removal of form 4473s from the FFL without consent (only a fool would consent to giving all 4473 to an ATF agent) may require a warrant. I’ve no good answer as I’ve never heard of such a thing happening.
     
    chris155au likes this.
  4. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    @Hotdogr,

    Forgot to mention I agree 4473 forms are not a registry. They were intentionally created to avoid existence of a registry.
     
    Turtledude likes this.
  5. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,279
    Likes Received:
    20,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    there is no central data base of 4473s. iF one existed, that would be illegal registration
     
    SiNNiK likes this.
  6. truth and justice

    truth and justice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2011
    Messages:
    25,869
    Likes Received:
    8,843
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are over 800 million 4473s located in one facility which can be searched by the authorities
     
  7. Buri

    Buri Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,723
    Likes Received:
    6,426
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    For what purpose are you suggesting?
     
  8. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Imagine if there really are 800 million 4473s at the NTC. That means there are 800 million records there on about 250 million firearms (firearms first sold after 1968 ). Plus there are all the 4473s stored in FFLs. Plus all the ones that have been destroyed. Does anyone know how many total 4473s have existed/been filled out? The number must be astronomical and there must be an average of at least 5 or more 4473s per post 1968 firearm. That sounds impossible to me.

    Does anyone know how many 4473s have existed?
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2022
    Buri likes this.
  9. Matt84

    Matt84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    2,472
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You still haven't told us what those facts are.

    We all know what you meant, I'm just waiting for you to go on and say it.
     
  10. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So before 1994, a violent criminal who has just been released from prison could lie and say that they have never been charged with a crime and buy a gun?
     
  11. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Essentially, yes. And in 1950’s and early 1960’s they just bought one no questions asked. What fascinates me is that when any child, felon, or mentally ill person in America could buy firearms through the mail or anywhere else with NO questions asked or background check, the firearm homicide rate was less than HALF what it is today
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2022
  12. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I assume that this is not an argument for removing background checks.
     
    truth and justice likes this.
  13. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Have I advocated for removal of background checks? PF would be more fun if people responded to what I post instead of creating armies of strawmen.
     
  14. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    When exactly did I say that you were making an argument for removing background checks?
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2022
  15. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    17,547
    Likes Received:
    9,919
    Trophy Points:
    113
    To be fair you didn’t. You assumed the opposite in fact. Apologies from me to you. I forget sometimes your posts are two-tiered (utilizing the conscious and subconscious) attempts to encourage thought in third parties, which I greatly admire and appreciate.
     
    chris155au and truth and justice like this.
  16. Space_Time

    Space_Time Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2015
    Messages:
    12,485
    Likes Received:
    1,974
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They threw the book at him:
     
  17. Izzy

    Izzy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2022
    Messages:
    9,460
    Likes Received:
    5,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    It's about time that the enabling parents of these shooters are being held somewhat responsible.


    'Highland Park suspected shooter's father is charged with felony reckless conduct'

    Source: CNN

    "The father of the man accused of killing seven people and wounding dozens more at the Highland Park, Illinois, Fourth of July parade was arrested Friday and facing felony reckless conduct charges, prosecutors announced.

    Robert Crimo, Jr., is charged with seven counts of felony reckless conduct, Lake County State’s Attorney Eric Rinehart said.

    Prosecutors allege Crimo Jr. was “criminally reckless” when he signed his son’s application for an Illinois Firearm Owners Identification card nearly three years before the massacre, which is required to purchase a gun in Illinois."


    Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/16/us/highland-park-shooting-suspect-father-charges/index.html
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2022

Share This Page