it does not matter if gertrude dingle berry wrote a 50000 page abstract if you light the (*)(*)(*)(*) and get iron spheres it has thermitic properties LOL
lol. [video=youtube;jZ9wSD4Hcys]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ9wSD4Hcys[/video] Wrong again koko. Do you know what the gray layer is, koko? Carbon Steel. Heat that up to 700C, and you will form spheres. Derp.
Little Dickie also stepped outside his area of half-adequacy when he stated that the spheres could only be formed by thermite. They are formed by the ton when you weld that much structural steel to build two sky scrapers. There is no way you will ever sweep every bit of the welding fume out of a building that big. L:ittle Dickie is not a chemist and would be well-advised not to play one on the internet. He doesn't do it well.
wow who woulda thought the wtc was made from steel wool! yeh there is a way though to turn columns into microspheres LOL steel wool columns, how novel, man nothing like troughers kikcking themselves in the balls LOL
missed the timeout, yepo another way indeedy doo though I assure you that no one here has the required knowledge to recognize whats going on in that clip
why am I arguing with this troll? I have already shown the Bentham paper is fraud, and I have provided 5 very good videos which further disprove thermite. There is really nothing left to discuss. Bump for koko; /Thread, thermite and koko are beat.
so you take gas and mix a little mineral spirits with it and call it gas, get trougher undies in a major twist. Nothing to see here SSDD.
I am probably not the only one who does not know what you are trying to say here. To whom were you referring?
I only post no quote replies to the post directly above. his op is bs long story short. it sounds pretty good though.
The lists of koko's dodges are getting longer and longer by the day. My post alone disproves thermite. The 5 videos at the beginning of the thread disprove it even more. And yet you still argue from ignorance, not even having read the material you are supporting.
no it does not, it only proves you have a different label for a slightly different variant, more in the nanobox trougher thinking.
You are supporting the Bentham paper. Bentham paper does not talk about variants. It talks about Thermite. Fe2O3 + Al. That is what they propose. That is their conclusion. That is what they failed to show. That is what has been debunked.
I believe the accurate term is "thermitic material", I see no point in your argument. you have proven your strawman I suppose. Oh I did like the steel wool spiders though, that clip was kool!
That is just a clever disguise for "thermite chips." In no way do paint chips resemble thermite other than in the minds of the ignorant and deranged.
I don't believe I'm arguing the contents of a paper with a guy who has never even read it. The thermite they authors claimed to have found was Iron Oxide/Aluminium. That is what they claimed to have found. No variants, no if, or maybe, just Fe2O3, and Al. As it happened, they failed to even find that. But you would know this, if you actually bothered to read the *******n paper.
