9/11 Official Conspiracy Theory Questions

Trying to reverse the burden of proof for the OCT or asking me to prove a negative still doesn't answer the question I asked you. I could just as easily claim UFOs took down the towers, any evidence it wasn't UFOs? This is grade school logic Shiner, grow up. Why don't you just answer the question? Is it too difficult for you to explain your belief(s) or do you just throw **** up against the wall and hope it sticks?

 

and you're still playing games asking questions but refusing to answer any ... typical troofer tactic ...

 

No matter how many times I repeat it, you still don't get it, this thread is not about me or "troofer tactic", whatever silliness that means, it's about asking questions about the OCT. So I asked you a question based on your devout OCT beliefs (because my question to you questions the OCT) that you hypocritically still failed to answer. It's actually you who is playing games.

 

Or you get a link to a video as a response. And when you bring that up, the next move is usually a “I didn’t agree with the video on that point”.

I’d just love it once if one of the truthers would just write down what they thought happened on that day.

 

Start your own thread then, the above is off topic.

 

Why is it that the "OCT" as you childishly call it is written in detail but none of the truthers will divulge their expansive knowledge as to what happened that day? What are you guys afraid of? Looking stupid? Much, much, much, much too late for that. So what is it?

 

You're still off topic, speaking of "looking stupid" this thread is still about questioning the OCT (Official CONspiracy theory), any part of its detail, that hasn't changed despite your rant, get a clue or leave. Start your own thread if you want a different topic for discussion.

 

It is the responsibility of governments and law enforcement to do a thorough investigation..they did not do that about the 9/11 mass murder and conspiracy...an armed robbery at a corner store has police tape around it longer than the 9/11 crime scene...what was the hurray to haul away the evidence and get rid of it? That in itself is a crime. There are lots of questions like everything from airport security, to the "standdown" of NORAD fighters..that was not a coincidence. When a party destroys evidence, such as the government has done on 9/11 it is a strong indication of guilt..they are covering up their guilt...

 

All false they did do a thorough job which you have no evidence to refute.

There was no stand down of any sort in fact NORAD has no fighters. NORAD is a monitoring and and early warning center not a tactical command.

No evidence that they destroyed evidence only baseless accusations.

Directly quote one passage of the report which you think is false and provide evidence

 

of



So you would agree with the government that a arab in a cave in Afghanistan was able to defeat the entire defence mechanism of the USA from that location, not only once but four times on 9/11...OBL: must be quite a guy...the USA should have hired him to protect them from all those dreaded false flag attacks..lol

 

The FBI said they didn't have anything to connect him with 9/11 and anyway, the guy who was renditioned and tortured mercilessly (Khalid Sheikh Mohammed), admitted "voluntarily" that he did 9/11 "from A to Z" so they changed the 9/11 "mastermind" on the fly. So then Bin Laden was "not a priority" as a result, until Obama needed a spectacle for himself.

 

Quote one specific passage from the 911 report which you think is false and provide evidence that it is a lie.

 

There is no official conspiracy theory and you are questioning nothing.

You have no idea what the details are because you chiildishly refuse to learn what it says and then claim that you know better.

 

Pretty much sums them up.

 

There certainly is an official conspiracy theory, and it is defined in the 911 Commission Report, issued by the US government. Are you really that uninformed?

 

And the NIST reports.

 

Wrong that is in fact a fictional and false definition. There is NO official conspiracy theory.

It is a factual account of what happened backed up by evidence. Conspiracy theories by definition have no evidence to support them.

Do not discuss the 911 commission report when in fact you have no idea what they wrote in the report.

 

Which you never read and are massively ignorant of by your own admission.

 

From your posts here, your ignorance of words and facts is astounding. Is it willful ignorance? I don't know.

 

I'm not sure which troll you're referring to (maybe both) but neither are ignorant or willfully ignorant. They both know and completely understand the government scam they're both playing along with. I don't believe for one minute either are genuinely ignorant or willfully ignorant. They have the same access to the facts everyone has, the same ones they pretend to deny daily.

 

I am stating facts.

You have not.

It is you posting in ignorance.

You have never read the report and are merely repeating an ignorant falsehood to call the official report a conspiracy theory. What I said was quite factual conspiracy theories have no supporting evidence.

As proof of this you will of course evade and run from answering a simple question.

Quote one specific passage from the official report which you claim is false and show evidence that it is false

 

he means you the only troll here.

you have not posted facts and that has been proven

 

please quote where this is defined in the report ...

 

We also have access to the 9/11 Commission Report. The one that is 100% accurate insofar as you're unable to quote any major inaccuracies in the report. In the absence of any inaccuracies being made public, the only conclusion one can draw is that there are none....

 

Correction, the only conclusion YOU pretend to draw is that there are no inaccuracies. Pretending everyone shares your mentality or your fakery is as silly and immature as it gets. This thread is loaded with links to videos and documents about people who are in a position to know and the standing (including those intimately and directly involved in the 9/11 Commission Report and a large number of 9/11 family members) have the exact opposite viewpoint. In fact, the 9/11 Commission Report itself notes that key portions of it are unreliable and therefore inaccurate.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...mission-scam-exposed-in-all-its-glory.495859/

By contrast, the viewpoint of anonymous trolls who infest discussion forums with their daily pretentious garbage is only relevant and meaningful to other anonymous trolls.