Still the 9/11 Deniers. Yes you do. You are presuming to know the motivations behind a conspiracy behind 9/11... Thereby, you are presuming to know what's going through "their" minds. Yes. "A missile was stolen from an army base and fired into the Pentagon." I mean, your conspiracy is that they were able to "sell" everything that they claim happened while hiding things like the fact that a plane flew low over the Pentagon and then went all the way to Ohio, landed, and was destroyed, along with everyone on board being killed, and not one person saw the missile they shot into the Pentagon, or where it came from, or anything, and hundreds of people saw the plane crash. They also "sell" Al-Queda as a well-financed, powerful, effective, terrorist network. You say they could "sell" all that, and yet you think it would be much harder to "sell" that Al-Queda stole a missile and fired it at the Pentagon?
You just lied four times and "9/11 deniers" sounds like what you skeptics are, in denial of the real truth. Um, no I don't. You are assuming I am presuming. You know what they say about assuming? Can you give me one real life example? When's the last time a missile was stolen from an army base, a CALCM no less? I'm going to start calling you guys 9/11 delusionals.
Wouldn't we have seen the terrorist firing the missile at the Pentagon too? (well..maybe not, since everything was confiscated and hidden from public scrutiny).
Sorry have you got something that can refute that or not? I offered it as a possibility and nothing more.. Surely you can't refute it. That must be it.. Exaggerate it because you can't refute it in its current form. I'm not saying that's what happened by the way.. But it is possible.
Sorry have you got something that can refute that or not? I offered it as a possibility and nothing more.. Surely you can't refute it. That must be it.. Exaggerate it because you can't refute it in its current form. I'm not saying that's what happened by the way.. But it is possible.
This question could be asked about any one of the many "conspiracies". You all seem to have your own esoterical take on the events and often ridicule each other.
Where? It's an accurate term for the group that denies the established facts with regard to 9/11, much like moon landing deniers and holocaust deniers. You say - quite frequently - that they "did" 9/11 to ___________ and fill in the blank with some purpose. That is presuming to know the motivations in their mind. Of an airplane being crash tested or a crash being simulated? Are you joking? When's the last time, prior to 9/11, that an airplane was hijacked into a building? If the government was making up stories, either one would be the first time it ever happened, so what difference does it make. That would be ironic to say the least. A shared delusion, shared by everyone on the face of the Earth outside of you and a few other tinfoil-hat 9/11 Deniers, who, at this point, number a few hundred people? That must be some kind of record. LOL... Do you think about these things before you post? Wouldn't they have seen a terrorist? YES. AND THEY WOULD HAVE SEEN A MILITARY BATTERY DOING THE SAME THING. AND NO ONE DID. WHICH IS REALLY GOOD EVIDENCE THAT YOUR COCKAMAMIE THEORY ABOUT A MISSILE IS ABSOLUTE HORSE(*)(*)(*)(*). (*)(*)(*)(*)ing A', you guys are ridiculous.
It certainly is, isn't it? A narrative that is accepted world-wide. You know, like the 'truthers' completely lack.
whats a 911 denier? you have not shown any evidence what so ever much less lying? people on drugs do that I hear?
Like engines made of candy. Dance, dance, dance, all night long. Great pay too in such a tough economy. Uncle Sam wants you!! LOL
We don't have access to all the evidence, some is locked up under national security. What we have is a nice little story that allegedly justifies the US going to war against an ideology. An ideology that is funded by US consumer dollars. A nice little money maker.
Just a question for you... I make my money defending employers against claims filed by current and former employees. Most times, these revolve around injuries the employees allegedly suffered at work. So, by your rationale, because I "profit" from these cases, I must have gone around injuring all these employees? Right?
what I think is hysterical about his post is like everyday here,he has been caught lying as usual in the fact they have changed their stories many times just like NIST did. He is afraid that so many people are coming over to the truth movement and people on the truth movement dont come over to his side.
whats ironic is thats what you official conspiracy theory apologists do.talk about blind sheep who follow.you worship the governments explanation of events no matter how absurd and pitiful it is and have the logic that all these top level intel officers,scientists,architects,engineers,experienced pilots,firefighters experienced in explosives are ALL lying and the government and mainstream media is telling the truth.good one not to mention you ignore how cheney and bush profited in the millions from all this. you obviously slept through junior high school science classes like all OCTA'S did.
yeah thats the perfect name for them to call.since this 9/11 deniar wants to call us that,they are 9/11 delusionalists.
Post a link to a specific lie he has stated here, or it proves you are the one lying. Cite a source that the truth movement is GROWIN. Hate to burst your bubble uninformed one but it is shrinking and dying on the vine. NIST changed no story because they created no story they issued an engineering report which of course was changed as new information became available. But you never read it so you have no idea what they changed.
