9/11 - The Legal Initiative

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Mar 19, 2017.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,007
    Likes Received:
    2,057
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here we go again:

    Citizens’ Rights Denied by N.Y. U.S. District Court- Appeal Filed

    EIGHT CO-PLAINTIFFS CONTEST RULING DENYING CITIZENS RIGHT TO GIVE EVIDENCE OF CONTROLLED DEMOLITION AND EXPLOSIVES USED TO DESTROY THE WORLD TRADE CENTER TOWERS TO A GRAND JURY

    Dear Friends:

    Lawyers’ Committee Litigation Director Mick Harrison recently filed, on behalf of eight co-plaintiffs an Appeal Brief in the United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit concerning the dismissal by Judge Paul G. Gardephe of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District in Manhattan of Plaintiffs’ complaint on Article III standing grounds. The complaint seeks to compel the United States Attorney for the Southern District to present to a Grand Jury evidence of controlled demolitions and explosives used to destroy the World Trade Center Towers.

    “Standing” is the legal right for a particular person or organization to bring a claim in court. A plaintiff must establish that they meet the legal criteria for standing. This generally involves demonstrating an injury and a direct connection of that injury to the defendants’ actions..

    The co-plaintiffs are: Robert McIlvaine who lost his son, Diana Hetzel who lost her husband, a fire fighter, Jeanne Evans who lost her brother, a firefighter, Michael O’ Kelly, a NYC Hazmat fire chief who lost his health and has permanent lung damage from working on the Ground Zero piles, Former Fire Commissioner, Nassau County Christopher Gioia who also worked on the piles and lost close friends who were fire fighters, Richard Gage, President and Founder of Architects & Engineers, and two non profit corporations whose missions are dedicated to 9/11transparency, The Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth…MORE

    The Plaintiffs made four claims. One claim (Count II) against the United States Attorney General and the United States Attorney for the Southern District concerns their violation of Plaintiff’s rights to Petition the Government under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution by refusing to present Plaintiff’s Petition to a Federal Special Grand Jury. Their obstruction created an injury in fact and an invasion of the Plaintiffs legally protected interest, the right to Petition the Government.

    The Plaintiffs also state claims(Counts III and IV) under the federal mandamus statute and the Administrative Procedures Act which both seek to compel the United States Attorney to comply with the mandatory duty pursuant to 18 USC 3332(a) to submit evidence of federal crimes, in this case dispositive of controlled demolition and explosives used to destroy the World Trade Center Towers to a Federal Grand Jury.

    Thank you.

    David R. Meiswinkle, Esq.
    President/Executive Director
    Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry

    Mick Harrison, Attorney at Law
    Litigation Director
    Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry


    https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11...enied-by-n-y-u-s-district-court-appeal-filed/
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  2. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,007
    Likes Received:
    2,057
    Trophy Points:
    113
    An FBI whistleblower explains how the FBI conducts coverups and continues to do so 24/7.

    FBI Whistleblower Dr. Fred Whitehurst on Exhibits and Evidence of Controlled Demolition

     
    Eleuthera likes this.

Share This Page