1. The government is evil, therefore cannot be trusted, therefore is guilty until proven innocent. 2. The reason truthers can't produce evidence to back up their theories is not because it doesn't exist but because the government is hiding all the incriminating evidence. 3. The reason that none of the thousands of people who would have had to be involved to pull off the tasks put forth in truther theories have spoken up is that they live in fear that the government will have them or their family killed if they come forward. 4. When presented with two explanations for an "anomaly" choose the one that implcates the government as guilty regardless of which explanation is more logical. Please feel free to add any that I may have left out.
5. When confronted by irrefutable evidence, run. Start as many threads about different theories as possible to cover up the cowardice. 6. When a "credible" source turns out to be lying, pretend you know what they "really" meant even if it means making up a lie that is just as bad. 7. Make tons of claims about how nobody looks at your evidence. When asked for your evidence, run or make up excuses as to why you have no evidence. 8. Alter theories to the point where they no longer explain the reason for the theory in the first place. A good example is pretending there is nano thermite paint when the basis for the theory is that the towers were brought down by controlled demolition. 9. Take up a "holier than thou" attitude while continuing to sling mud. 10. Pretend compartmentalization is the answer to everything.
If they are unknown, how do you even know they exist? At what point do you believe there are no more unknown unknowns? It has been over a decade since 9/11. Not one unknown "gotcha" has ever been found. How much longer do you wait before starting to believe there are no more unknowns that would radically change the entire story? Wouldn't it be easier to follow the evidence and if / when unknowns come up, incorporate them into your belief system rather than dwelling on the paranoid feeling of unknown unknowns and somehow convincing yourself they MUST exist and MUST be found?
Is that why truthers accuse people based on zero evidence but based on their suspicions because others did something vaguely similar if one squints really hard and ignores justice? Sounds like a witch hunt or a lynching to me. I prefer to try someone in a court of law, not the court of public opinion where one has to lie and pretend to have evidence to make one's case. Out of curiosity, how do you justify this kind of action to yourself? Do you understand it is wrong at some level or are you perfectly OK with condeming people based on your perception of them and what other, unrelated people have done in the past?
Hi Pat. I was paraphrasing the Pentagon. "Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns -- the ones we don't know we don't know." -Donald Rumsfeld
The government is certainly evil and cannot be trusted. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=145531 However, we don't think the government is guilty until proven innocent. We think it is innocent until proven guilty. The government has been proven guilty as the proof that 9/11 was an inside job is crushing. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746 This is the classic disinfo tactic of trying to sway those who haven't come across the evidence. You're trying to make them think there isn't any evidence when there is in fact a mountain of evidence (see above link). It's not just that. The press would never print any testimony of someone who tried to come foreward. This is from a thread on another topic but it applies to 9/11. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4731597&postcount=1087 Be sure to watch this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU Wrong. We choose the most logical one. You pro-offical version people can pretend all you want. The proof that 9/11 was an inside job is so clear that the only thing you can do to sway people is to try to keep them from seeing it. Here's some more stuff that people who are new to the topic should look at. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCHN-1Yk5LI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxorz4jWDMY
Wrong. We choose the most logical one So,instead of choosing the group that were avowed enemies of the United States,and had killed our people before,you truthers blame people who's business it is to protect us...sounds logical to me...<snicker>
The SPAMINATOR strikes again! More proof truthers can't think for themselves and have to spam other peoples opinions as their own. Want more proof they have no evidence to back their crap up? Think about it. If they had one piece of really good evidence, they would trot it out for every discussion. Does that happen? No. They CLAIM they have all kinds of evidence and then pretend they... um... misplaced it somewhere....
That is freaking hilarious, right there. Well I guess I'm not very good at that since I routinely encourage people to look at as much info as they can from both sides and decide for themselves which is more credible. You see, I rely on truthers to discredit themselves. They haven't disappointed me yet in that regard.
That is what happens when you have one side with the truth on it and the other side a bunch of liars. The official story is the official story. Truthers can't even agree with themselves who carried out 9/11, how they carried out 9/11, why they carried out 9/11, how they covered up 9/11..... yet we're suppose to believe the truthers? Most truthers end up spewing theories that contradict one another. Take your theory of nano thermite paint. The whole purpose of claiming explosives were in the towers was to explain the truther claim of controlled demolition. Except controlled demolition can't be done with thermite of ANY kind as you can't time the reaction or how fast the steel will react. There are dozens more reasons why thermite is not even considered for controlled demolition, yet truthers proudly pretend thermite is the answer! They just forgot what the question was.
Yet you can't say exactly why it is BS, can't present any evidence it is BS, can't present an alternate theory that doesn't read like some third grade science fiction failed attempt, and have been reduced to "speculation" to explain your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) theories. That's enough I'd say.
Riiight. And "no planes" and voice morphing are not BS. Gotcha What is your position on the "no planes theory" and "voice morphing", Jango?
The 'no planes' theory is ridiculous. Like Project Blue Beam. I'm relatively unfamiliar with the voice morphing stuff, but I've read the thread here. However, I have wondered how so many people made so many phone calls from cell phones up in the air. Not saying there is a connection between the calls and voice morphing, but there is certainly a connection between phone calls and oddness.
Except most of the phone calls were made via airphones, not cell phones, and most of the cell phone calls suffered from dropped calls.
They weren't all from cell phones, but I'm guessing what you have read up to this point does not explain that. The list of phone calls made from Flight 93 can be found at this page. https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/flight93page1 The site is in general good information if you are looking for information from BOTH perspectives in order to make an informed decision on your own.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/specialsections/40th-anniversary/Nine-Historical-Archives-That-Will-Spill-New-Secrets.html
