911 CONGRATULATIONS!! - Truthers Force NIST to Change Final Report on WTC7!

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Aug 14, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We just need ONE...once that happens, they'll start chirping like canaries. (and Cheney will pretend he's "sick" again). They're comin'.
     
  2. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NIST admitted free fall.

    How does free fall occur when there's something to impede it?

    Impedance removed, obviously, by controlled demolition, hence FREE FALL.
     
  3. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OH NO! So when will the assassinations of prominent truthers begin? I mean if this conspiracy is as big as you believe it to be, what makes you think the Government isn't willing to murder every single one of you to keep it a secret?
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So, the papers have been filed at least?

    (You still haven't mentioned what the 'truthers' won, so I'm guessing it's just imaginary.)
     
  5. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    They only endanger themselves by doing as you suggest, but to answer your question, there have been many killed under "mysterious" circumstances. It's too wide spread now. To respond to us would be exposing themselves. Hence, the paid shills that preach all official with vigor and dedication 24/7. So long as the shills keep everybody confused enough, then, the chance of anything concrete surfacing is diminished. The people are easily led, and they're lazy, so they buy whatever BS is thrown at them, while they pop their Zolofts, their depression pills, and turn off their brains.
    They know the truth, the same as us, and believe me, it scares the (*)(*)(*)(*) out of them. That's why all you see here are attack shills, determined to distort the facts as much as possible by any and all means. Editing, deleting, banning, 3 or 4 on one attacks (the same ones over and over).

    But back to the OP.

    NIST admitted free fall, and free fall SHOULD NOT HAVE OCCURRED in a well constructed building like the WTC's. Resistance had to be removed ahead of time for free fall to occur. Hence..........DEMOLITION.
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Paranoid rantings aside, here's a question:

    Has Kevin published these ideas in a respected scientific peer-reviewed journal?

    No, you say?

    Why not?

    What paperwork has been filed to expedite indictments?

    None, you say?

    Why not?
     
  7. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There won't be any indictments, some of those NIST fellows will start having mysterious deadly accidents.
     
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    paranoid? says who? You? hahahqaahah!

    Not filed yet that I am aware of, these things take time when the gubafia blocks all investigation.
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113

    The judges will try and throw it out for any bs reason that sounds "plausible"
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Paranoia like this:

    What investigations have been 'blocked'? Isn't this whole thread about someone who made his own investigation and 'forced' NIST to change their report?

    Are you now claiming that he was 'blocked'?
     
  11. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Paranoia like that statement.
     
  12. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sooooo... 9/11 Deniers are claiming a "victory" because there is a change they concur with between the "draft" NIST report and the "final" NIST report.

    Gee, from something like that, you'd almost think none of the Deniers had ever worked in an office, or held a job, or engaged in any other productive activity where human beings understand that things get changed in the process of going from "draft" to "final".
     
  13. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
  14. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    FREE FALL was admitted. That's the pertinent point here. You don't get free fall without assistance.
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There was indeed assistance (fire). Like a building burning for seven hours without that fire being fought.

    Free Fall of one section of one corner of the building, not the entire building, lest you forget.

    What did 'truthers' win again?
     
  16. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    From "no free fall" to "yes, there was free fall but...."

    What next? "Yeah...explosives were used, but...?"
     
  17. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What did the 'truthers' win?
     
  18. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113

    there was no final, there never will be a final because they will not release the numbers they used for the fancy model.

    wtf is a 911 denier
     
  19. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    admission of freefall

    freefall = demolition/prepping
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Free fall is not a condition of controlled demolition.

    What did the 'truthers' win, again?
     
  21. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I did not say it was a condition of demolition.

    freefall is a condition of little to no resistance which can only take place by demolition or prepping.

    stop trying to obfuscate my words.

    they won admission to freefall.

    do you have a retentivity problem? It was said from the OP forward.
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So now the final published version of the WTC7 report is correct.

    Gotcha.

    When are those indictments coming? You've had three years of declaring victory with no results to show.
     
  23. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Free fall. Free fall. Free fall.


    Gotcha.
     
  24. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Got what?

    When will those indictments come along?
     
  25. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Soon as we shut down the airports and ban the shills.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page