A warning from NASA - IGNORE IT AT YOUR PERIL!

Not so - I'm trying to save you all from yourselves.

 

It can and has been done....If you bothered to read a bit about modern spacecraft and NASA you would know that.
http://www.nasa.gov/rosetta

I suggest you take a day to review the data before commenting again in order to avoid further damage.

 

Just one final comment - NASA impresses you far more than it impresses me. I don't believe everything I read without a bit of tangible evidence, whereas you obviously do. I'll just have to write you off as a failure. Have a good day!!!

 

Okay...I suppose video documentation of the event is considered intangible evidence. Likely you also do not consider video from the space station evidence of a spherical Earth and dismiss satellites and the moon as well.

Let me guess....gravitational theory is a conspiracy to fool us all.

 

They're not videos they're CGIs ffs! Jesus some people are so unbelievably gullible!

 

Okay there Bucko....consider this to be an intervention.

Dwelling in the belief in extremely unlikely events while having proven events that negate them is defined as conspiracy theory. As a general rule these "Conspiracy Theorists" are seen as less than intellectually empowered by anyone not being one of them. Once defined as such by the 99+ % of humanity they are usually dismissed as irrelevant, ridiculed, or toyed with for the limited entertainment value before being giggled at and tossed in the trash.
As it is obvious you fit handily into this category, I am currently utilizing the third option and will continue to do so until bored. Likely your condition will not allow you to understand or accept this reality which will allow me and others to continue the slightly enjoyable game of fingertip laughing at your expense. Now...please continue with your "Opinions".

 

Um no. In the 1960s we developed the Saturn V rocket which launched manned missions to the moon. Even that rocket would be able to hit an asteroid elsewhere in the solar system with a respectable warhead. And again we already have landed on a comet. If you can land on a comet, you can hit an asteroid.

 

Last word on the subject because I'm bashing my head against a brick wall here and I'm a-getting tired of it: a simple question which might stir a sense of reality - if you were earning a lucrative living spouting nonsense, albeit imaginative nonsense which nobody can possibly dispute but you know they'll believe it anyway, thereby ensuring your 'nice little earner for life' will continue unto retirement, would you break ranks by spilling the beans, and by doing so lose it all? A yes or no will do!

 

What you really mean is that we have been told that one has by those self-serving 'scientists' in whose interest it is that we believe it, but they do so without offering even the merest shred of tangible evidence. It's only a matter of whether someone is gullible enough to believe it or isn't. I'm in the latter camp!

 

Unfortunately I cannot answer yes or not to a question that makes no sense. Of course people will believe in something that "nobody can possibly dispute".

 

What? Are you a conspiracy theorist or something? We find out when they fail. It makes spectacular news. Apollo 1, Apollo 13, Challenger disaster, Columbia disaster, that one where they lost the probe because somebody used English units instead of metric.

 

The moon is 'around the corner' stuff. Mars is deep space, inter-galactical stuff??? You have spectacularly missed the entire point.

 

Over 500 people have been into space, 24 of them have travelled beyond Earth orbit, and 12 of them have step foot on the moon. Most of these people are no longer making a living off of their space activities, so what would they lose by "spilling the beans" as you say?

 

I've been referring to the hierarchy of the so-called 'space agencies', and the lesser staff in the control centres who don't want to lose their jobs, not the here today, gone tomorrow guinea pigs.

 

I've know some of the lesser staff in the control centers, many who no longer work there so they have no reason to keep NASA secrets. If it was really so lucrative, they wouldn't have left would they? Besides, if anyone would know that NASA was faking it, it would be those "guinea pigs" who NASA claims have actually been in space.

 

We're beginning to go around in circles so there isn't much to be gained by continuing. As I said yesterday - I know better than to try to open a closed mind.

 

Do not confuse poor journalism with good science

 

I don't confuse anything with anything, I'm an intelligent man.

 

A good way to determine whether a piece of news is legitimate or not is to ask yourself: "Does the coverage this story has received correspond with the supposed magnitude of its significance?"

IE, if a killer asteroid was actually likely to strike the earth and annihilate us all, do you think there would be anyone here who has somehow remained ignorant of this information by now?

 

Who gets information from online tabloids

 

Who's gullible?