My entire commentary simply expressed the realities I not in everyday life. They are not meant to be politically correct or degrade black people in general, instead they refer to noted and obvious issues in society in an attempt to express opinion as requested for debate. You may decide to focus on clothing, but the clothing is a means of recognizing what I refer to. I admit to my bigotry based on race...yet this is a result or the actions of the people I fear and dislike.
Kostenki man was black . You just provided a source that doesn't disprove that the original inhabitant of every continent was black.
<Rule 2/9> I am white and appreciate desegregation because it allows my white sister to live with her biracial children. Are you saying that my 8 year old nephew and his black father who served twice in Afghanistan shouldn't be allowed to live among us whities because they aren't "our kind?" Maybe we need segregation but instead of it being by color it's by the degree of <Rule 2/9>ery. You and people like you should all go live together and let the rest of us HUMAN BEINGS with no differences besides the stupid man-made ones coexist like civilized people. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And for anyone who thinks blacks can be racist is sadly mistaken, prejudice yes but racist no. A father cannot hate his son but a son can by way of misguidance, hate his father.
That's a no true Scotsman right there. Besides, he is not the only racial-realist/white nationalist/supremacist saying this stuff. There are websites that host nothing but this sort of rhetoric and so unless it can be proven that all those participants are infiltrators, this is exactly what the rrwn/s ideology represents from where I sit.
Ahhh, it's nice to see the attempts at pseudo-intellectualizing the white supremacist agenda with myopic and revisionist views of recent history. Of course, in this screed the actions/reactions of the majority (white) gov't and police infrastructure have NOTHING to do with outcome. And as for Bible quotes: since the USA wasn't even a wishful thought (much less the concept of Europe) at the time of it's scribe, any attempts to use it to justify racism and bigotry is just plain absurd. But hey, Davey Duke made a lot of money humping around in Middle Eastern countries selling his anti-semetic speeches to the brown folk in charge, so he's okay.
Black skin doesn't automatically equate to African, Asian Indians for example can have Black skin and their phenotype, and genotype are quite different from Sub Saharan Africans.
Most nationalists / race realists don't support genocide, unfortunately the few ruin it for the rest.
Actually colonization of Africa came later overall. The Scramble for Africa came when the Atlantic Slave Trade was winding down. The sad truth is that in most cases Western Europeans bought slaves from other African tribes.
Eh, I think Asians are the most non-threatening to tell you the truth. Not many Asians have a chip on their soldier so to speak, Whites seem intermediate between Asians, and Blacks in this aspect.
Many North Korean Soldiers with a chip implanted in their shoulder might tend to disagree with you. lol....
There's definitely some rough Asians too, but judging by crime statistics, and my personal experiences, they're generally quite mild mannered people. Chinatown in San Fransisco was once the poorest neighborhood there, but also the lowest crime rate neighborhood there. I mean, my dad was a teacher in prison, he taught some Chinese gangsters every now, and then too, but he admitted they were polite, and learned quickly.
North Korea/s definitely a bad situation, no doubt about that, but I think there probably isn't too much crime there, they're still quite disciplined from my understanding. But, of course any Human can become a monster like Animal in certain circumstances, just some more than others. For example there's no denying that Men are more violent than Women.
I really like Koreans, I have had many Korean friends, dear friends, it was a play on words, soldier, shoulder....
Yes and blacks are indigenous to every continent on earth, that is the source of what you might call black power.
It was white Europeans that held them in slavery and brutally tortured and crucified them for 400 years, not Africans. When point the finger of blame at Africans there are a thousand pointing back at euripeans .
By skin color probably, but genetically the earliest Eurasians were more like modern Eurasians than like modern Africans by DNA.
57% of the Atlantic Slave Trade was done by Portuguese, and Spaniards who aren't exactly very White in coloring. Many African tribes definitely sold their victims of war to Western European colonists. The Black African Kings of Dahomey being one that stands out, they said they wouldn't eat without slave profits, they also went to war to capture slaves for profits, but these Black African captives would have otherwise been killed / sacrificed by the Black African Kings of Dahomey.
Washington D.C. is 50% black, 38% white. You start segregating by cities, they will have to rename the white house.
Good point, but evidently there are a few minority pandering svck-ups here who wouldn't mind changing the name of the WHITE HOUSE to that of the black hole house.
Obviously you know nothing of pre colonial Africa. The Spaniards and Dutch were white whichever way you look at it. 400 years of chattel slavery and you still don't want to accept responsibility, shame on you