Alaska court upholds Republican recount win in House race

Discussion in 'Elections & Campaigns' started by Bluesguy, Jan 7, 2019.

  1. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    "JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — The Alaska Supreme Court on Friday upheld the results of a recount in a disputed state House race that showed Republican Bart LeBon winning by one vote."

    https://apnews.com/3cb04600ac034bb1a2efd020765f6bb6

    What is the left and the Democrats say about voter fraud is a non issue because it doesn't happy on a massive scale? How many fraudulent votes could have decided this race?

    Hmmmm
     
  2. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What is the right and the Republicans say about voter suppression is a non issue because it doesn't happen on a massive scale? How many suppressed votes could have decided this race?

    Hmmm...looks like i can make a really ****ing pathetic argument too!
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2019
    AZ. likes this.
  3. Moi621

    Moi621 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    19,292
    Likes Received:
    7,606
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Where were the Democratic Party Ballot Harvesters,
    or is a third party handling a ballot illegal in Alaska
    as it should be everywhere.


    Does anyone really believe, Orange County, California is totally " Blue"!
    ballots.jpg
     
    TrackerSam and Blaster3 like this.
  4. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Hmm looks like you can't provide a reasoned response. How many fraudulent votes would it have taken to change the outcome of this election and how does that fl with the Democrats and leftist claim that voter fraud is not an issue because it is rare and doesn't happen on a massive scale. Are you going to dance and dodge like with the other examples I have posted?
     
  5. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have not posted a SINGLE example of voter fraud.
     
  6. John Sample

    John Sample Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2018
    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    276
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Likewise it is hard to find a case of actual voter suppression.
     
  7. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So what? How many would it have taken to change the outcome? What massive number? Why the dancing?
     
    John Sample likes this.
  8. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again, you have not posted a SINGLE example of voter fraud. Stop dodging.
     
  9. Jestsayin

    Jestsayin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2016
    Messages:
    16,798
    Likes Received:
    17,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Righties win = rigged election thru,
    1. Voter Fraud
    2. Voter suppression
    3. Voter Disenfranchisement.
    4. Racist
    5. Misogynistic
    6. Homophobe
    7. Ballot farming
    8. Ballot stuffing
    9. Voting machines
    10 Gerrymandering
    11. Horeshit weather
    12. Thirty days is not enough time for early voters.

    Lefties win
    1. No problem, we should win every election.
     
  10. John Sample

    John Sample Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2018
    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    276
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    It is pretty fun to cause horse **** weather for each election. I think we should add earthquakes.
     
    Jestsayin likes this.
  11. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm under no obligation to do I have not asserted there was one so so now answer what I asked - how many fraudulent votes WOULD it have taken to change the outcome of this election? Give me the number how many to have changed the outcome? What's the massive number? Or would you agree only one fraudulent vote COULD have changed to outcome of this election? And certainly you are not asserting NO fraudulent votes are ever cast in any election?
     
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2019
  12. 61falcon

    61falcon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    21,436
    Likes Received:
    12,227
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How about the Righties in North Carolina PAYING PEOPLE to pick up absentee ballots from voters then either filling them out or altering them?????
     
  13. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He asked a simple question.
    How many would it take?
    Answer before you provide your commentary
     
  14. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I assert the same as I always have. Voter fraud does not take place on a statistically significant margin.

    One particular study found, consistent with others, roughly a dozen instances across a dozen years out of more than one billion votes cast. On the other hand, strict forms of voter ID are associated with a 2-3% reduction in voter turnout. That is exponentially much more likely to affect an election.

    The fact that voter fraud could have altered an election is irrelevant if you can't establish that it actually happened, let alone establish that it could alter the election.

    I have seen your bullshit many times blue guy. You do not talk about cases of voter fraud. Instead, you try to find close elections and say, "holy ****, voter fraud is so bad because look how it could have altered this election." It is a ****ing terrible and pathetic argument.
     
  15. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No.
     
  16. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok.
    You can discredit yourself if you wish
     
  17. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Righties finally got a case where there are actual allegations of fraud committed against dozens or hundreds of voters from one election. And yet, crickets. Why? Because the person who committed the fraud is a Republican.
     
  18. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As if answering that question does jack **** to my credibility in your eyes.
     
  19. Wildjoker5

    Wildjoker5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,237
    Likes Received:
    4,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL, who are they suppressing in AK? Was it the 2 black people that live there?
     
  20. Wildjoker5

    Wildjoker5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,237
    Likes Received:
    4,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Righties call for the same voting rules to be implemented in NC as they call for in the rest of the country.

    BTW, what happened in NC also happens in CA. The only difference is, the lefties in CA passed a law to make what happened in NC legal in CA. Voter harvesting should be illegal, full stop.
     
  21. Wildjoker5

    Wildjoker5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,237
    Likes Received:
    4,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You know there are many examples of voter fraud that happen, happening from both sides. Don't play dumb. Here is your request of absolute voter fraud along with you assertion that NC voter fraud that you already admit to.
    https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/201...-votes-being-cast-from-grave-year-after-year/

    Now, show us something other than the new black panthers standing out side a polling place intimidating voters not to vote because of their skin color. If you truly believe there is actual suppression, there should be evidence.
     
  22. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How do you define "actual voter suppression?"

    If you are willing to include the "intimidation" caused by black panther members standing outside a polling station, would you also include a strict form of voter ID law the prevents student IDs as an acceptable method, for example?
     
  23. Wildjoker5

    Wildjoker5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,237
    Likes Received:
    4,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    See, the NBPs targeted only whites going to the polls, the voter ID laws applied to everyone equally.
     
  24. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,325
    Likes Received:
    38,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What margin would it have taken here? How about Virginia last year for control of the statehouse?
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2019
  25. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You intentionally edited my post. I will post it again, in full - in response.

    I assert the same as I always have. Voter fraud does not take place on a statistically significant margin.

    One particular study found, consistent with others, roughly a dozen instances across a dozen years out of more than one billion votes cast. On the other hand, strict forms of voter ID are associated with a 2-3% reduction in voter turnout. That is exponentially much more likely to affect an election.

    The fact that voter fraud could have altered an election is irrelevant if you can't establish that it actually happened, let alone establish that it could alter the election.

    I have seen your bullshit many times blue guy. You do not talk about cases of voter fraud. Instead, you try to find close elections and say, "holy ****, voter fraud is so bad because look how it could have altered this election." It is a ****ing terrible and pathetic argument.
     
    rahl and AZ. like this.

Share This Page