All The Doctors Testified They Saw An Exit Wound On The President

Bullshit.
A Gsw to the neck is never casually observed.
You are speculating with no knowledge of how a trauma unit functions

 

No but claiming it refutes the autopsy is idiotic

 

So what?

 

So they only made casual observations and not conclusive identifications of exit or entrance wounds.

Their memories and recollections do not challenge the official autopsy findings which is the point of the OP

 

Why don't you just admit that you have no knowledge of how a trauma unit works?
Casual observation of a critical injury by a trauma team. That's some funny **** right there

 

I have far more knowledge of how they work than you do BOY.

They do not determine details of where bullets came from etc they do not determine which wounds are exit or entrance wounds nor do they perform or challenge autopsies.

Furthermore and this is important they claimed they observed this wound to the head AFTER he was dead and they were finishing their work which makes IT is a CASUAL observation and not a detailed examination.

Now run along

 

You watch Trauma: Life in the ER?
You had a crush on George Clooney back in the day?

 

Don't go around claiming to be an expert son.

Anyone can make such claims from the safety of your moms basement borrowing her laptop as you are doing. Self proclaimed experts are the biggest liars on here.

Fact are what mattered and I stated facts

 

You did that mom

Can you still get ER in syndication?

 

No I never did.

I merely stated facts

 

That a GSW to the neck is casually observed in a trauma unit? Where did you train again doctor?

 

I was clearly referring to the head wound do try to keep up boy.

The neck wound was only barely noticed before IMMEDIATELY being cut over for a tracheotomy.

 

A GSW to the front of the neck is never barely noticed Doogie.

 

You would not know fraud

 

That is so hurtful Trapper

 

No just accurate

 

funny !!!

yah yah yah there is nothing confusing about anything on this Earth !!

Everything is cut and dried !!

Funny !!

iggy.

 

Which train program instilled you with such accuracy Marcus?

 

You know what's "cut and dried"? A big hole in the back of JFK's skull!

 

Which proves nothing conspiratorial

 

A gun shot wound (entrance or exit) to the President of the United States would be very studiously observed by all medical personnel. In addition, the back of the President's shirt was a bloody mess, which is strongly indicative of an exit wound --- and remember he has a sports coat on top of that!

 

Well let's see duh, this is not rocket science. The small hole was in the front of his skull, the much larger hole was in the back of his skull, his brains were all over the trunk of the limo (behind his head) and his head violently lurched back. For an adult with reasonable intelligence and no specific agenda, it should take about 1.5 seconds at most to reach the conclusion that the bullet came from the front, unless one is dyslexic. For a doctor, I'm estimating no more than 0.3 seconds or less, maybe instantaneous.

 

No you are very wrong it would NOT be studiously observed by ALL medical personnel. At an autopsy sure it would be carefully examined looking for evidence of where the bullet came from which the autopsy experts found and determined the entrance wound was caused by a bullet which originated from above and behind. One way for example that they look for this is to look for beveling in the entrance wound which gives them a rough indication of where the bullet came from since few if any bullets enter at a perfect right angle.

Emergency room doctors however do not studiously examine bullet wounds in this manner as their first and foremost duty is to try and save the patients life. Sure they take not of the wounds and attempt to determine which life saving procedures take priority based on the severity and location of wounds but they have no interest or expertise whatsoever in carefully examining wounds to determine evidence.

That is what autopsies are for and the autopsy Trumps any casual opinion based on the observations of ER doctors, which is all you have.

Bloody messes are not specific indications of a type or wound they are merely indications of a wound

 

You are right it is not rocket science and your claim is predicated on a glaring proven lie.

There was no entrance wound small or any other size in his front.

That fact destroys your idiotic claim

 

People usually say "if it were only that simple" in such a clear cut case but it really is that simple!

I argued awhile ago about how the laws of physics and displacement settled the matter distinguishing an entrance from an exit wound (bullet enters body in a relatively small neat hole and as the bullet travels through the skull, in this case, pushing bone, brain matter and other tissues ahead of it until it shoots out of the skull leaving a massive hole, relatively speaking, thanks to accumulated matter spewed out creating an enlarged exit wound).
OR....
Think of a baseball thrown through a window and on which side of the hole all the broken glass and such accumulates: On the side the ball came from? Or the side where the ball went to?

I actually had a genius (quote, unquote) arguing against the laws of physics and the way the universe operates. So stunningly dumb!