FoxHastings said: ↑ 9 months of pregnancy with the pain, discomfort, and illnesses, the temporary and PERMANENT physical damage, the loss of money, medical bills, possible complications that are not only painful but costly, the possible job loss, educational/career setbacks... There's no "wonder" about it at all. If it's her CHOICE to remain pregnant....or not. And your comment is totally irrelevant. Why should they be sterilized? Not wanting to be pregnant doesn't mean they never want to be pregnant. Try some logic.
. No, I do not do a 360 or a 180 (Duh, a 360 is a complete circle)....I always believe women have a right to their own bodies. The "touchy feely empathy that Anti-Choicers have for pregnant women? Where is that? You make empathy sound like a bad thing....typical. Because it isn't a person and has no rights. See, I can type that as many times as you pretend you don't know that. NO, ALL women should have the same rights as everyone else. Why couldn't you address the post of mine you quoted. FoxHastings said: ↑ Yes, because science, (that scary thing), deems it a parasite..it lives off another entity.....which NO other person is allowed to do..."""
Sure he does and it a chance to give the man a right to give the woman a hard time over the matter.as there is zero need for the law if the man and woman are on good terms.
That superficially sounds like a believable platitude, but actually the woman is very likely to go through with it without consulting her unborn fetus's father, even if she is not on bad terms with him. And it's possible she could do it to spite him. Did you ever think of that?
It's interesting the funeral home operator was charged with improper treatment of bodies when the bodies of those fetuses still got treated with a whole lot more dignity than they would have at Planned Parenthood. The main difference I can see is that those particular fetuses were wanted. So now their bodies matter and society becomes upset if their remains are not treated with dignity. The article said police found it "deeply disturbing". Well, why should they have? If these aren't people like Pro-choicers tell us?
No, they didn't. Where did it say they were wanted? That's a paragraph of irrelevance ...and the last sentence has no basis in reality or logic. Maybe you should stick to threads on Panda bears
If they weren't, presumably they wouldn't have been brought to the funeral home in the first place, would they?
No, they didn't. Where did it say they were wanted? That's a paragraph of irrelevance ...and the last sentence has no basis in reality or logic. Maybe you should stick to threads on Panda bears The article never mentioned wanted or unwanted...they could've been from miscarriages...and it has NO relevance to the case... Another of your carefully cherry picked responses...