BEST Zapruder Stabilized to date: 2013 (amazing)

Discussion in 'JFK' started by Validation Boy, Nov 19, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Holy Crap!!! This footage is amazingly crystal clear.

    It's settled! No more unanswered questions!

    Thought you guys might like to see for yourselves who killed JFK once and for all.

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Sqk3sdfXFkc

    Thank you, to whoever produced this!

    Looks like the guy Directly in front of Kennedy WAS the trigger man, after all.
     
  2. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I take that back. Jackie blew his brains out.

    She's so tenderly leaning him forward, shoving a gun under his chin and BLAM!

    She finished the job.
     
  3. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Indeed, Jackie killed her hubby.
     
  4. logical1

    logical1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    25,426
    Likes Received:
    8,068
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I still find it hard to understand how Kennedy's head jerks backward if the bullet came from the back.
     
  5. Junkieturtle

    Junkieturtle Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    13,451
    Likes Received:
    4,416
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't see anything indicating Jackie or a passenger in the car fired the shot, but it definitely looks like the shot came from Kennedy's front and to the right. If what I'm seeing isn't the entry, but the exit explosion, then the shot did have to come from behind to create the exit trajectory shown in the video.

    Also, I get that they enhanced the video, but why is there a floaty image thing? What purpose does that serve?
     
  6. snakestretcher

    snakestretcher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    43,996
    Likes Received:
    1,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did I read somewhere that it was postulated that the shooter was in a storm drain, thus explaining the low, frontal entry wound and huge exit wound? If they still exist then the original plans/drawings for the drainage system would show the dimensions of the drain, along with access points.
     
  7. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's what Tom Wilson discovered from his research. I found it to be an interesting theory as it provided a perfect exit strategy for the shooter as well.
    The Men Who Killed Kennedy
     
  8. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    4,468
    Likes Received:
    2,754
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so manhole theory now? LOL...

    This is another one that has failed the test. A reconstruction of the scene was done by experts and high tech tools whereby the scene was recreated and it was proved that at the exact time of the head shot, the trajectory from the storm drain didn't hold up; the shot was not possible. This has been destroyed....

    let me bring something else up, which i find laughable. Someone here posted quotes and pics of doctors claiming there was a large exit wound in the right of Kennedy's back. Let's think for a sec, if the exit would was on the right side of the back of his head, then the shot MUST have been made from the other side - the left of the motorcade? and not from grassy knoll as you all believe it was? HOW the HELL do you guys explain this? So where was the this shooter? geez...
     
  9. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It is awfully tough to determine exactly all the details of the Kennedy assassination because 1100 CIA documents are still classified and won't be released until 2017. The goofiest theory of all is that Oswald acted alone. Big hole in the back of Kennedy's head indicates exit wound which means like Dr. Perry, and others, indicated ... shot from the front.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  10. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yeah, because Jackie is clearly shoving a gun under his chin and finishing the job.
     
  11. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    This video uses all the visible frames that are available at any point during the Zapruder film. That's why the cars are popping in and out of visibility. But when the prez's car gets right in front of the camera, you can see jackie shoving something right under his chin...

    And BLAM! Finishing the job.
     
  12. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    we know beyond a doubt that the shot came from the front,"despite all the efforst of the paid shills that have penetrated this section constantly posting lies day and night defending the lies of the warren commssion that oswald did it." while I wouldnt rule it out that it possible jackie could have done it,the thing that disproves that is the blood and brain matter landed all over officer bobby hargis the motorcycle officer riding on the left bumper behind jackie where it would have landed on the cop behind the bumper of kennedy had she done it,I still am going with the driver.we know someone in the limo fired the fatal head shot because some of the dallas doctors said it was from a handgun fired at close range,the trolls always ignore that fact.so it obvioulsy came from the car,but it was the driver though cause where the blood landed is consistant with him doing it and even a few witnesses said they saw a secret service man in the limo with a handgun.

    - - - Updated - - -

    we know beyond a doubt that the shot came from the front,"despite all the efforst of the paid shills that have penetrated this section constantly posting lies day and night defending the lies of the warren commssion that oswald did it." while I wouldnt rule it out that it possible jackie could have done it,the thing that disproves that is the blood and brain matter landed all over officer bobby hargis the motorcycle officer riding on the left bumper behind jackie where it would have landed on the cop behind the bumper of kennedy had she done it,I still am going with the driver.we know someone in the limo fired the fatal head shot because some of the dallas doctors said it was from a handgun fired at close range,the trolls always ignore that fact.so it obvioulsy came from the car,but it was the driver though cause where the blood landed is consistant with him doing it and even a few witnesses said they saw a secret service man in the limo with a handgun.
     
  13. smevins

    smevins New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2013
    Messages:
    6,539
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That has been addressed multiple times in the media.
     
  14. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It wouldn't. If a bullet enters the front of the head then as the bullet travels through the head physics proves that the bullet will slow down and pull the head in the direction of the bullet (force). "Back and to the left" is proof of a front head shot. People who claim that a bullet that hit Kennedy from behind and sent his head backwards simply do not have any understanding of elementary physics. That is likely a high % of high school graduates.
     
  15. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    In the film, I believe I see Jackie O finishing the job off.

    And also, don't forget how that ugly skank went on to marry some Greek Billionaire, whatever THATS all about. Lol
     
  16. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't know why Jackie would have wanted to kill her husband in public. It does not make sense to me. I do understand why Greer would have wanted him dead.
     
  17. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,102
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No the laws of physics are not nearly as simplistic as you claim. This is why you never answer when asked to describe exacty how it violates the laws of physics. You simply do not know anything about the science of physics.

    There were more than one simple force affecting JFK and causing his physical reactions. Neuromuscular response is very common and routinely cause people to move in a manner which is unpredictable and impossible looking until it happens. This has been shown to you specifically on these forums. Another force is the jet affect which many people have observed and proven to be real. which of these or other forces caused the movement " back and to the left " may never be proven. However they do prove that many forces can affect the movement of a human body which has been shot. The conspiracy shills simply are wrong when they claim that a body has to always move away from the gun when shot. Endless veterans of gun battles know that this is simply not true.

    There is no evidence of any kind that any one except Oswald shot Kennedy and the Zapruder film actually supports that evidence. When one looks closely one can see that his head moves forward before pink mist appears and before the back and to the left movement. All of which is consistent with a bullet striking him from behind and then some other force making him go back.

    BTW it is amusing to claim that the government pays people to " penetrate " a website which is open to the public.

    You may wish to adjust your tinfoil brainbeam protection hat if you believe such sillyness.
     
  18. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,102
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's funny because no one else see's anything of the sort nor did any of the witnesses including the four other people in the car.
     
  19. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,102
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok why would Greer want to kill his employer. Greer was a well paid chaffeur with no0 college or high school diploma and who immigrated from Ireland. Why would he want to kill the president?

    Neither zany theory makes sense and no evidence supports either one. The film clearly shows no one in the limo had or fired a weapon.
     
  20. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    yeah that HAS been addressed multiple times proving its IMPOSSIBLE for that to happen if shot from the back.any 7th grade physics kid knows that.:grin:
     
  21. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Yeah Greer even had connections to the CIA. Jackie? while true that Oswalds handler Demorenshield had connections to the CIA and had a close relationship with Jackies family,the bouviers,and she would have the motivation for wanting him dead with all his sexual adventures he had with Marilyn Monroe and other women,theres just nothing out there that points to her like there does with Greer.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Naw,again thats not possible since the blood and brain matter landed on Officer Hargis.Withe Greer,it fits though.
     
  22. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Naw,none of the dallas doctors saw an entrance wound under his chin,they would have seen it.gotta rule that one out.
     
  23. smevins

    smevins New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2013
    Messages:
    6,539
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Seriously? I have seen recreation after recreation after recreation address it in the single shooter was Lee Harvey way even without the fact that Kennedy was in a back brace that made it very difficult for him to move forward..
     
  24. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,102
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It was not impossible and perfectly consistent with the laws of physics which of course you know nothing about.

    I have asked you to specifically state which rule of physics it contradicts and you never answer.
     
  25. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,102
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Greer had no connections with the CIA other than possibly meeting some CIA employees while on duty in the white house. Oswald had no handler as you claim. DeMohrenschildt's only connection with the CIA was to provide information learned from his overseas travels like thousands of other Americans. Nothing points to her or Greer, and no evidence supports either one.
     

Share This Page