Beverly Hills: Climate Hypocrite DiCaprio Expands Carbon Footprint.

I agree that climate warriors need to do their part. And that is through both voluntary action and legislation. Laws that protect the environment aren't some crazy controversial thing. When done effectively, they just work.

 

There is no scientific basis that supports that claim.

 

I'll refer you to the EPA regulations that successfully helped reduce smog in American cities. When was the last time you heard of acid rain?

 

If they all immediately moved into tents and bicycles, there would be no need to force legislation on everyone. I'll keep saying this, because it's the reality. The world's greenies do 90% of the damage. ALL they have to do is stop living the way they do.

 

Too many false doomsday predictions.

Honestly I see the climate religion as more of a cult.

 

Mantra if privilege. Isn't it funny how much these people complain about other people's privileges.

 

The reality is that nobody is going to move into tents and bicycles. In fact getting people to reduce their emissions by just 10% is for all practical purposes not going to happen. This is why we have government. So we can do things as a society that we are having trouble getting done voluntarily.

 

What false doomsday predictions?

 

Are you kidding me. We were supposed to be underwater now over a dozen times, they're supposed to be at least two ice ages that happened already and the glaciers were supposed to have disappeared.

Basically every single prediction they've ever made is wrong.

It's like they don't know what they're talking about.

 

Wait who predicted the whole planet would be underwater? Are you talking about the Waterworld movie?

 

I knew that he was a grifting sleazebag back when MTV still played music.

 

No idea and I have no idea where you're asking me that.

 

You said that! You! You said that some scientists predicted that we would be underwater. Who? Who said that? Who?

 

I never said that.

 

"Too many false doomsday predictions."

"We were supposed to be underwater now over a dozen times". That was you.

 

Show me where I said the words "the whole planet" because I don't see it.

 

Delete

 

When you said, "We were supposed to be underwater now over a dozen times", I thought you were using "we" for "humanity". Maybe you can clarify what exactly you were claiming.

 

I wasn't claiming the stupid things you say. I never am.

So words you say that I didn't are not my claim.

This shouldn't need clarifying.

 

I directly quoted what you said. I then asked you to clarify. The reality is you made some crazy accusation you have heard a million times but when asked to back it up ... well ...

 

right and in nowhere in my words did you see the words "the whole plant."

That was stupid trash you made up and then demanded me explain the stupid thing you said to you.

I already did the ignorant trash that fell out of your mouth fell out of your mouth.

I can't make it any clearer than that.

I didn't say the stupid **** you said.

If you find this frustrating and the future don't realize how heavily on dishonest strawmen

No, you made the crazy assertion and pretend it was me.

You even quoted my words more than once.

You're stupid strawman is not my claim it never will be.

It's amazing how desperately dependant on it you are.

 

And in all that you refused to clarify what on earth you were claiming. So you haven't established that the scientific community claimed we would be underwater. You also haven't established that there was ever a scientific consensus that we would be in an ice age. You claim climate experts are misinforming people. Turns out, its you.

 

Wth I claimed what I stated. Read my ****ing words.
[QUOTE[
So you haven't established that the scientific community claimed we would be underwater.[/QUOTE]I didn't claim any community claimed anything. I claimed the climate change cult claimed something.

You really need to not add **** to my claims. It's like you need to make strawman fallacies over and over.

Just stop with it. I know you're stupid cult belief is being threatened and that makes you nervous.

it's because "scientific consensus" isn't a thing. This is a cult tradition to try and place more validity on ignorant doomsday beliefs.

 

Funny thing is that you are refusing to clarify your claims about us being underwater or ice ages. How am I supposed to have a conversation with someone who refuses to explain what they believe?

 

What do you need clarified other than your strawman isn't part of my claim?

Don't start out with strawman fallacies.

I don't know why I should treat you with any respect when you fail to even acknowledge what you did.

At this point I judge you as 100% bad faith. Everything I say will be misrepresented. Because everything I have said was.

If you want good faith act in good faith.

My judgement can change can your behavior?