Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Joe knows, Sep 15, 2021.
No, not at all. It says more about the parents. They value thier politics more than thier child.
This is a photo of President Biden with the girl you claim he molested. She has recently traveled with him with the knowledge of her parents; he even took her out of the country. She is his grandaughter. The person your source says confirmed his grope was not the person in the video and has since said that she was not telling the truth about the incident.
Doesn't matter who it was. Unless the video was tampered with it is plain to see that Biden groped her.
Democrats and Republicans elect pedophiles and misogynists into the office of President and Biden is no exception.
I'm not covering for it. My posting history is searchable. I've called it out when I see it. As I mentioned before (but maybe not to you), I am a former cop and former child abuse advocate. Even outside those capacities, I have ALWAYS advocated for children and seniors. I would absolutely call it out here if I saw it, but I don't.
In reality none of us know what he was doing or why she moved and none of us can ever know the truth behind it. In this specific clip, I do not see anything like what you're describing. I'm not saying you're imagining things. I just don't have the same viewpoint you have about this. I think that you may be jumping on that bandwagon that sees just about everything Biden does as offensive. Of course, that's your right as a person protected by freedom of speech. It just doesn't allow you to tell other people what they should think.
That's a nice photo. He seems to have a very close relationship with his kids and grandkids. I think it's nice.
I think a lot of this is just bashing the guy because they don't like him. It's even weirder because they don't acknowledge any inappropriate sexual behavior of ANYBODY on their side. So, it's kind of the same thing as Trump with the election fraud claims. He made the same claims during the 2016 election but didn't pursue legal action because it was in his favor. So, they just rationalize any illegal, immoral and disgusting sexual behavior (grabbing, raping, having unprotected sex with hookers, human trafficking) as long as the person has an "R" behind their name. It's sick and wrong on so may levels especially since they claim to care so much about every women bringing a baby into the world. It's just that that life doesn't matter once he/she takes it's first independent breath. <smdh>
Same kind of proof required for Justice Kavanaugh?
So much for Hillary's claim...
Breast or not, should a grown man be touching a 7-year-old in that area for any reason? No. Poor little thing's lucky she wasn't a member of his Senate staff or she would have enjoyed his finger up her 'joina...
Because Democrats don't believe such moronic lies about him. Easy.
If your article lied about the "girl" that "confirmed" the story (she admitted it wasn't true) could anything else in the story be misleading?
Prove its fake. The girl in the video has confirmed it’s real.
This stuff started a long time ago.
Got any of that on video? Thought so.
Where did she claim it was not true
Your whataboutisms are irrelevant and barely coherent.
Kavanaugh had accusers.
What claim of Hillary's do you mean? I like minimalism, but some context would be helpful.
Is that Cornpop?
I don't have the burden of proof here.
Link to the girl's statement, please. Has she filed charges? Taken it to civil court? Has there been a credible, formal, public accusation?
What whataboutism? I was replying to another poster’s subtextual reference to the veracity of sex abuse claims, rationally related to the topic.
Hillary stated “all women who come forward with claims of sexual assault have a right to be believed.” This “reasoning” requires those allegations to be affirmed regardless of evidence. Mrs. Clinton is an attorney so we can assume she understands the definition of a right and chose that word deliberately. Did that same standard apply to her husband? I am old enough to remember the “I believe Anita Hill” bumper stickers... often — in perfect irony — on the same cars with Clinton/Gore stickers, but nobody had an “I believe Monica Lewinsky” sticker. So it turns out only some women have a right to be believed.
If you were replying to another user's comment, why was the reply directed at me? Since I don't habitually read each and every comment on a thread (I value what's left of my sanity), how was I to know you were referencing another comment? And since this thread is about an accusation against Biden, your comment IS, in fact, whataboutism, it just perhaps didn't originate with you.
As for Hillary's statement, I disagree. Women don't have the "right" to be believed, but it is wise to heed her and take her at her word until proven otherwise, and rude to dismiss her out-of-hand. In the era of #METOO, disbelieve us at your peril. Her relationship with smarmy Bill is her business. I'd have dumped him decades ago.
At least you agree Hillary was wrong. Baby steps.
“Did Joe Biden pinch you?” A user by the name of Jonathan Pasetti asked, to which Piacesi responded, “Yes.” However, soon after, she deleted her comment.
from your own source tactical...
Separate names with a comma.