BLM Louisville defends posting bail for alleged would-be mayoral assassin

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/quintez-brown-blm-louisville-defends-posting-bail

Isn't this unbelievable?

This ****** shoots a mayoral candidate on Monday and a judge lets him out on Thursday, and Blaks Libes Madduh puts up his bail, yet there's "outrage" that cops handcuff a black kid in a mall fight caught on video.

And we used to say you can't make **** like this up over stuff not one tenth as bad.

Evidently the leaders of Blaks Libes Madduh saved some of the change caught in their mansion's couch cushions to bail out the worst ******* who try to shoot prominent whites.

 

https://www.courier-journal.com/sto...brown-bail-others-support-suspect/6830995001/

Innocent people?

Who is he kidding?

All blacks are innocent and all whites are guilty in America.

The original sin and the the original get out of jail free card.

 

Why did this person have a bail set in the first place? Bailing him out should not have even been an option.

 

Why do I get the feeling there is more to this than being reported? This doesn’t make much sense.

 

More, as in what? That he didn't really do it? That he's being framed? This is what loony liberals in America are striving for: no blacks in jail. Crimes committed make no difference. They think blacks in jail is racist and the moron voters are making this possible by electing Soros backed DA's.

 

Who said that? And why?

 

So this is where he got the bail money from:
https://afgj.salsalabs.org/louisvillebailfund/index.html

It’s a general form. It looks like anyone who was arrested can take money from it.

 

Liberals say it every day. Maybe you don't care to listen.

 

No, if you're getting $100,000 for attempted murder, someone has to let you take it. BLM announced they were going to give him the money. He shot white people. He's their hero.

 

I don’t care to listen to the regurgitated nonsense conservatives think liberals say yes. I learned long ago they tend to lie.

 

He was arrested, asked for bond money, and if this is where he got the money from it applies to everyone who was arrested. BLM is standing by their principles that everyone deserves a fair trial.

 

the right and left bailing people out is ridiculous, but... they are breaking no laws and that was their bail

why set a bail if they did not expect someone to be released on bail, are we admiting 'high bails' are really meant to be 'no bail'?

why don't we just say "no bail" like we mean?

I think it's time to stop pretending someone has the option of bail, when they really know they could not afford bail - let's just deny bail in cases like this, as this should never happen

 

He obviously should have been held on no bail.

This is a two pronged problem.

1) He never should have been allowed bail
2) A criminal organization like BLM who collected money and whose owners used it to buy four or five mansions each shouldn't be allowed to exist.

 

exactly

 

LoL everybody except Chauvin...... they literally said they would burn down the city again if he wasn't convicted.

 

I do agree, non-profits are being used by both sides in ways we never expected

I agree on innocent until proved guilty... UNLESS caught in the act and arrested like in a case like this

 

they need to add some criteria to their program, sounds like this guy found a loophole to some free bail money

 

You know how I know you are randomly posting? This happened Louisville, where the death of Breanna Taylor is still fresh.

 

Nope it’s there like that on purpose. Because every crime accused of needs a legal defense. Not just the “innocent ones”. My bet? They have contributed to all sorts of murder trials and such “morally unsavory” trials already.

 

if bail is set, the system says they are safe to release if they can post bail

that is the real issue, bail should of been denied

 

Which then begs the question- if it was so obvious bail should have been denied, why was it set so low?

 

exactly

 

So, the troubling thing here is that many folks have been trolling this line about how Brown is mentally touched. So, now dude is out of jail where he might have been managed and not a threat to the rest of the city. BLM let him out. It seems pretty obvious that his "freedom" is vastly more important to them than his mental health or the public safety.

I asked this on the thread I created on the original topic of the crime. It seems Louisville democrats are all stumbling over themselves to virtue signal their guilt making what certainly seems to be a more dangerous city the outcome instead of a safe and welcoming city to all. Remember the target was Jewish. This is likely not just an attempted assassination but a hate crime. And now, the allegation of metal instability cannot be addressed because Channelle Helm from BLM believes that a black criminal in jail is morally indefensible.

So, the response will be likely that charitable bail will be made illegal by the legislature in KY. BLM of course, won't take responsibility should Brown commit more crime, and they won't be held liable for it. And a violent mentally unstable person is out walking the streets again.

That illustrates perfectly what democrats do these days. We cannot protect the safety of the public because the point of democratic policy is to make ordinary folks the targets of they rage that folks would dare to reject their socialist autocracy.

 

Which can mean one of two things. The first is Brown isn’t a danger to himself or others now and very unlikely to reoffend. Or it means the entire system is corrupt to the core with liberal judges because “Fox News told me so in between ivermectin shots”. I doubt latter.

 

my guess is because the da was lazy, it's harder to request bail be denied, they just assumed a high bail was the same in this case

which is really an abuse of the system, bail should either be denied or set at an amount someone can afford (in this case... denied)