BREAKING: Emails Reveal Burisma Consulting Firm Leveraged Hunter Biden To Get State Dept. Meetings

You don't know anything about Lutsenko?????? He was the bloke who replaced Shokin, the very bloke you tried to tell me closed the Burisma investigation down. Is this a *boom* moment?

 

Guiliani was notably absent from the weekend shows. That's pretty suspicious.

 

"You people" that hurts.

 

You've lost me.

In what way does some guy's name detract from my analysis?

 

If you don't know who he is, how can you possibly know what he did? Did you read my Link?

 

The Facts: This figure frequently cited by Biden defenders and the media significantly understates what Burisma was paying Hunter Biden’s Rosemont Seneca Bohai firm for his and Devon Archer’s services. Bank records obtained by the FBI in an unrelated case show that between May 2014 and the end of 2015, Hunter Biden’s and Archer’s firm received monthly consulting payments totaling $166,666, or three times the amount cited by the media. In some months, there was even more money than that paid.

The monthly payments figures are confirmed by the accounting ledger that Burisma turned over to Ukrainian prosecutors. That ledger, which you can read here, also shows that in spring and summer of 2014 Burisma paid more than $283,000 to the American law firm of Boies Schiller, where Hunter Biden also worked as an attorney.

The Facts: This is one of the most egregiously false statements spread by the media. Ukraine’s official case file for Burisma Holdings, provided to me by prosecutors, shows there were two active investigations into the gas firm and its founder Mykola Zlochevsky in early 2016, one involving corruption allegations and the other involving unpaid taxes.

In fact, Shokin told me in an interview he was making plans to interview Burisma board members, including Hunter Biden, at the time he was fired. And it was publicly reported that in February 2016, a month before Shokin was fired, that Ukrainian prosecutors raided one of Zlochevsky’s homes and seized expensive items like a luxury car as part of the corruption probe. You can read a contemporaneous news report about the seizure here.

Burisma’s own legal activities also clearly show the investigations were active at the time Shokin was fired. Internal emails I obtained from the American legal team representing Burisma show that on March 29, 2016 – the very day Shokin was fired – Burisma lawyer John Buretta was seeking a meeting with Shokin’s temporary replacement in hopes of settling the open cases.

In May 2016 when new Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko was appointed, Buretta then sent a letter to the new prosecutor seeking to resolve the investigations of Burisma and Zlochevsky. You can read that letter here.

Buretta eventually gave a February 2017 interview to the Kiev Post in which he divulged that the corruption probe was resolved in fall 2016 and the tax case by early January 2017. You can read Buretta’s interview here.

In another words, the Burisma investigations were active at the time Vice President Biden forced Shokin’s firing, and any suggestion to the contrary is pure leftist bullshit.
https://johnsolomonreports.com/debu...-myths-about-biden-and-election-interference/

Raid 1 month before Shokin fired: https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/322395.html
Interview w/ John Buretta: https://www.kyivpost.com/business-w...kyiin-legally-sound-manner.html?cn-reloaded=1

 

What should I be looking for in the article?

What's the significance of Biden not asking that Lutsenko be hired?

 

What is the source for the information that the investigation was idle?

 

His source is the sycophantic lying media that "investigates" by reading the hourly faxes from the DNC telling them what to say & think.

 

This has been the story answering Biden charges but I haven't seen any information as to how the Obama administration knew that to be true. In this cynical world of politics today it is far more believable that the prosecutor was getting too close to damaging truth for someone and that was what got him fired. The Hunter Biden connection reeks.

 

Neither does Biden, if he has to testify about actions during the course of his duties as Vice-president.

 

Joe Biden sold his office for personal family gain. I don't know how anyone argues against it.

 

Unfortunately he does, he hasn't been Vive President for almost 4 years.

 

Is there a 4 year limit ? If not, he enjoys the same executive privilege as does a sitting executive.

 

Dirty Donnie sold, is selling, and is entertaining bids on the power of the President.
Have you sent in your bid yet ?

 

You have proof of course.

No?

Then bullshit.

 

Yes he does.

Corruption isn't in the VPOTUS' job description.

 

I asked first, so there!

 

You have proof, of course.

No ?

Then bullshit.

 

https://www.spitfirestrategies.com/vice-president-job-description/

Nope, not in the job description.
(Psst...There needs to be investigations to find evidence of corruption STARTING with these emails.. Mueller failed with Trump...)

 

Ain't nobody talkin'.

 

It goes when he does.

 

I think the democrats in congress are really stupid enough to actually want it to go to the Senate. The senate can then make Schiff testify, the whistleblower, Obama, the Bidens, anyone they want. The Repubs will chew up the democrats and spit them out.

 

And keep 6 senators off the campaign trail!