BREAKING NEWS: disgruntled employee just killed eleven (11) co-workers in Virginia Beach

No. Because it Black felons wake up, tomorrow, and were allowed to carry firearms again?

We would see an immediate, exponential increase in White citizens and White cops killing Black citizens ---with impunity!

 

Can someone post the perp's pic? I can find it anywhere!! lol

 

Please don't edit my comments for content. If you would like to emphasize a particular portion for response, emboldening, italicing and underlining are all great ways to do that without undermining the context of my point.

As to your claim that more armed blacks would equate to more blacks shot by whites... if I were black, that would damn sure make me more concerned about protecting and exercising my gun rights, not less. Though I don't think its true. The NBP are one of the most notoriously and openly armed political groups in the US today (as is their right). Yet their armed marches are never met with gunfire from whites. It seems to me their strategy of armed self defense makes them less likely to be shot, not more.

 

Nope, never once undermined any context. And nope, NBP can't ever touch this legacy which ---continues to genocide Blacks even today:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/fbi-white-supremacists-in-law-enforcement

 

I didn't say you did. But its easy to do when you presume to determine which parts of someone elses point are relevent. In any case, Im asking you politely to not do it to me, since I don't do it to you.

And Im not saying the NBP have anything to do with a legacy... Im saying if whites were more likely to shoot armed blacks, more NBP's would be getting shot by whites. But they arent. Which suggests their tendency to arm themselves is somewhere between inconsequential to their safety and beneficial to their safety, as opposed to detrimental to it. And I'd hazard to guess that they would agree (lest why would they be armed?).

 

that is what people are saying, it should be harder

 

Complete idiocy.

 

Not at all. We just do not have access to weapons so easily.

 

Youn do it up front and fight to change the Constitution to keep your kids safe from being slaughtered with their pals at School.

 

It is the Law of the Land which is not the same concept as the Rule of Law.

 

Handguns kill far more people than rifles do, you and I both know it. Yet you demonize rifles.

Agenda much?

 

Dunno. However, we all do know what happens as a matter of routine in the USA.

 

What is a "regular old rifle"?

 

Yes, we do. Every day women across America defend themselves from rape. With guns.

You and your kind would laughingly take a woman's gun from her while in the middle of being assaulted, I have no doubt. Your kind would probably hang around for the show.

Disgusting animals.

 

........ HAHAHHAHAHHAHHHAHA~~!~!~!~

Fun nay.

 

Spiting out the words does not make it so, Texan.

 

Because they don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. Idiots.

 

You spitting that tripe elucidates it though.

 

How much harder does it have to be?

 

So you'd dishonour your Constitution?

 

same as the machine gun

 

Nothing of what I have said is 'tripe.' That is just you spitting, Texan.

 

I tell you what BL, just because I like you. When you come to take my guns, be very careful, the barrels will be very hot.

 

I am not a gun person, to me a regular old riffle is the normal ones people use for hunting

 

Why though? To what effect? Rifles are used in what, like 1% of crimes? Why do you ignore these other firearms are misused much more often?

Agenda.