Building 7 was the most obvious example of the 3 that fell

This gives you the skinny on WTC7, with all of its irregularities, it's unlimited trail of question after question...none of them answered satisfactorily. What are you going to teach your kids about this black operation? The truth, or a fairy tale? Did you know that WTC7 was NEVER hit by any plane, and that it fell at 5 o clock in the afternoon? WTC7 was the strangest of all three buildings that were brought down by demolition on that day. If you can't find any irregularities with WTC7, you're likely asleep, or simply not up to the challenge of discovering the truth. Everybody that thinks 911 was a self inflicted wound is supposedly crazy. Those that bow to every detail of the story, are (we're told), sensible Americans. Which are you?



http://goldenageofgaia.com/accounta...dictionary/911-world-trade-center-building-7/

 

'self inflicted wound?' it was hit by debris from the towers,Fraud..

 

An opinion piece.
Published in 2007.
On a site called "The Golden Age of Gaia".

*snicker*

 

From the article:

Wait no more, truth seekers.

http://www.nist.gov/el/wtc7final_112508.cfm

 

I HAVE taught my kids the version that is supported by the facts and evidence available. In other words, not your version. Also there weren't 3 buildings that were destroyed, there were more. In fact there were more that were part of the WTC complex, like 6 and 4 WTC. More top notch research fraud, good work.

 

If you're telling them the "official" BS version, you're lying to them.

 

I have seen the weight of the WTC being tossed around on the net as 500,000 tons for each tower. It does calculate into joules for the math enthusiast. If you calculate the amount of weight falling and being converted into kinetic energy then you could imagine the amount of material causing damage as they reached their point of kinetic diversion upon meeting the resistance of anything beneath The blow-out would definately damage and take out smaller buildings.

 

The bottom line is that there would be no freefall speed without explosives clearing the way below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVCDpL4Ax7I
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/evidence/35-key-facts/275-nist-admits-freefall.html
http://www.youtube.com/results?sear...1j1.12.0...0.0...1ac.1.11.youtube.uYHh4w5RFXM

 

The bottom line is: there's no such thing as "freefall speed". It's an ignorant term truthers made up.

 

No evidence of explosives was found scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c

 

What little Dickie and his dancing charlatans forget to mention is that when a free-standing structural element, such as a single wall, fails it will procede downward at free-fall acceleration. The segment that idiot boy Chandler clocked was, for all intents and purposes, free-standing, because all of the inner support had collapsed over a ten-second time frame. Notice that the failure point was well below the artificial horizon of buildings blocking the view of the bottom of the structure. It apparently snapped at or above the eighth floor. Notice that acceleration decreases suddenly when that section meets resistance from the rubble below that point.

Dickies dingalings do not know what to measure.

Since the major part of the debris of collapse was moving away from the camera, it is even likely that some of the movement that Chandler was measuring as downward motion was lateral, which would appear vertical because of the parallax.

 

Or a mechanical penthouse....

 

bld 7 is the crux of the 9/11 coverup commission the shills here cant get around,they always play dodgeball on this issue.they never have any answers for why there were other buildings in the area with far more severe damage and far more severe fires that were much closer to the towers yet they all remained standing.

they'll all come on here and play dodgeball with this post evading the facts posting irrelevent stuff in hopes of trying to derail your thread.lol.

- - - Updated - - -

damn straight.thats nothing but lies that are being told to them if its the b.s version of the governments being passed down to them.

 

Name them and provide sources for your claim.

 

The other buildings in the area, structurally, bore no resemblance to the towers or #7. They would, thus, not behave at all like any of the three in a fire. That bloody simple.

 

More useless cheerleading from the woefully uneducated.

 

but nothing fell at free fall speed.

 

Twoofers just don't get....but yet, they know "the truth".

 

so you are just going to lob insults. The bottom line is that no matter how you slice it. NOT A SINGLE THINK FELL AT "FREE FALL SPEED" ON 9-11. Anyone saying that is lying or doesn't understand facts.

 

Very, VERY, near free fall speed. If I dropped a brick off from the same height as the towers, the tops of the towers would ALMOST reach the ground simultaneously. That's where the term "free fall" speed originates, and, despite the shill rhetoric, it's QUITE real. What's false, is the claim that it doesn't exist, but that's what the shills do. They PRETEND science doesn't exist. Witnesses don't exist. Eyeballs don't exist. Hey, it's a job, I guess.

 

Conspiracy believers are like Jesus believers. They will say or invent whatever they need to maintain their faith, and are quite impervious to logic. They have their identity bolted to their belief, and it will take a major tear-down/rebuild to separate them.

So there's little to be gained tussling with them, except the exercise....

 

uuummmmmm.....I know that...I'm not arguing differently.

My comment was, you can present the facts to the Twoofers and it won't make a difference because, they know "the truth". Although, none of them can agree on the details....lol

 

no they wouldn't come close and I know that because every video of the falling towers shows parts of the towers falling faster than the towers.

 

Exactly. What's really funny is, when they claim the WTC fell at "free fall speed"...but yet, you can see debris falling faster than the WTC. What that's that?...."enhanced free fall speed"?

 

what I know is that all truthers ignore science. Most of them are liars and they wouldn't know the truth if it hit them in the face.
It is just like the ancient aliens crowd.