COMEY BUSTED! FBI Chief FOIA Officer Under Oath Confirms ALL OF COMEY’S Memos Were Classified

More reliable than NYT, CNN, MSNBC or any of the other democrats pretending to be news orgs.

 

Create threads from credible sources. It's that simple, you source is a fake news AKA propaganda site.

 

There were no rules broken, so go cry in your coffee.

 

I'll wait until I see someone more respectable reporting on the contents of the sworn testimony. As it stands, all we have is a guy from JW claiming what was said in the testimony.

But as an initial matter, Comey still has the reasonable defense that he believed his personal notes were not classified. And since intent is a prerequisite for any criminal prosecution, Comey ain't going to jail.

 

You do understand you use "Snopes" and "Politicalfact" as sources without showing the documents as false right?

Here is a though research something before you just do a quick google search.

 

Are you suggesting a former SoS AND FBI director do not know what should be classified? Intent was shown when he leaked it to a friend to leak instead of leaking it himself.

 

Peeps that think critically don't debate propaganda from fake news sites. LMK when it's verified by FAUX News, still waiting.....

 

more trolling

 

More indepth to.....as the Lame Stream knows damn near all the left has trouble with reality when things get complicated. So they keep it simple for the simpletons.

 

What is "fake" about the interview?

 

Yes, I am explicitly saying that Comey rationally believed that his private notes to himself were not classified.

And the fact that he leaked through a friend dies not prove intent.

Consider what your argument would be if he leaked it personally. The argument would just morph to, "he knew it was classified, that's why he leaked instead of just publishing."

 

They don't care about the interview. They want to discuss JW or Gateway. It's pure trolling and they seem to be able to get away with it.

 

She has no idea, Such things arent allowed in Russia

 

Well as you see Margot just isn't able to keep up with reality. Hence all that BS that she hasn't seen Judicial Watch get anything done.

The funny part is when she bitches about what was released thru the FOIA. Then argues against it.

But hey.....they didn't get anything done. Other than force up the Deviate Demos trying to keep records hidden from the Public.

 

but the left claims that bs about everyone who proves them wrong.

 

Good thing Congress is looking into it instead just passing it off as the usual usual.

 

So you think its "rational" that a FBI director does not know what is determined as Classified information?? Good thing he was fired then!

 

Exactly.. Judicial Watch chased the so called murder of Vince Foster for over a decade in spite of the autopsy reports. JD trolls and they are allied with Steve Bannon and Brietbart news which is a huge joke.

 

Well anyway you've been reported for a Rule 5 infraction: Trolling and intended to disrupt a discussion. We will see what happens.

 

What those documents reveal tends to be a big deal, however.

I assume that's why there is so much push back when JD's efforts expose things certain people would rather remain hidden.

 

No one cares if you call it fake.

 

If true, then charges should be filed.

 

Well what the left doesn't want to claim. That which is known as.....reality.


[PDF]
WHAT THE MEDIA SAY ABOUT LIBERAL BIAS
www.discoverthenetworks.org/guides/bias.pdf
Media Bias Basics - Media Research ... Evidence of how hard journalists lean to the left was provided by S. Robert Lichter, ... WHAT THE MEDIA SAY ABOUT LIBERAL BIAS


Conservatives are right: The news media is very liberal ...
fortune.com/2015/11/02/liberal-media
Conservatives Are Right: The Media ... Study after study has shown that the mainstream media leans left, ... But the persistent existence of a liberal media bias ...


How the Media Vote

The Media Elite (1964-1976) • White House Reporters (1976-1992) • Major Newspaper Reporters (1980) • U.S. Newspaper Journalists (1984) • The Media Elite Revisited (1988-1992) • Washington Bureau Chiefs and Correspondents (1992) • Newspaper Editors (1992-1996) • Campaign Journalists (2004) • TV and Newspaper Journalists (2004)

KEY FINDINGS:

• 81 percent of the journalists interviewed voted for the Democratic presidential candidate in every election between 1964 and 1976.

• In the Democratic landslide of 1964, 94 percent of the press surveyed voted for President Lyndon Johnson (D) over Senator Barry Goldwater (R).

• In 1968, 86 percent of the press surveyed voted for Democrat Senator Hubert Humphrey.

• In 1972, when 62 percent of the electorate chose President Richard Nixon, 81 percent of the media elite voted for liberal Democratic Senator George McGovern.

• In 1976, the Democratic nominee, Jimmy Carter, captured the allegiance of 81 percent of the reporters surveyed while a mere 19 percent cast their ballots for President Gerald Ford.

• Over the 16-year period, the Republican candidate always received less than 20 percent of the media elite’s vote.

• Lichter and Rothman’s survey of journalists discovered that “Fifty-four percent placed themselves to the left of center, compared to only 19 percent who chose the right side of the spectrum.”

• “Fifty-six percent said the people they worked with were mostly on the left, and only 8 percent on the right — a margin of seven-to-one.”

White House Reporters



KEY FINDINGS:

Walsh wrote of the White House press corps members he surveyed: “Even though the survey was anonymous, many journalists declined to reveal their party affiliations, whom they voted for in recent presidential elections, and other data they regarded as too personal — even though they regularly pressure Presidents and other officials to make such disclosures.”

• “Those who did reply seemed to be representative of the larger group. Seven said they were Democrats, eleven were unaffiliated with either major party, and not a single respondent said he or she was a registered Republican (although some might have been but were not willing to say so).”

Major Newspaper Reporters

In 1982, scholars at the California State University at Los Angeles asked reporters from the fifty largest U.S. newspapers for whom they voted in 1980. In that election, Republican Ronald Reagan won with 50 percent of the vote, compared with 41 percent for Democratic incumbent Jimmy Carter and 8 percent for liberal Republican-turned-independent John Anderson.

KEY FINDING:

• 51 percent of big city reporters cast a ballot for Democratic President Jimmy Carter, 24 percent for liberal independent candidate John Anderson, and 25 percent for the Republican winner, Ronald Reagan.

U.S. Newspaper Journalists

In 1985, the Los Angeles Times conducted one of the most extensive surveys of journalists in history. Using the same questionnaire they had used to poll the public, the Times polled 2,700 journalists at 621 newspapers across the country. They found that by a margin of two-to-one, reporters had a negative view of then-President Ronald Reagan and voted, by the same margin, for Walter Mondale in 1984.

KEY FINDINGS:

• When asked how they voted in the 1984 election, more than twice as many newspaper journalists chose liberal Walter Mondale (58 percent) over the conservative incumbent Ronald Reagan (26 percent), even as the country picked Reagan in a 59 to 41 percent landslide.

• Times staff writer David Shaw expounded: “When asked ‘How would you describe your views on most matters having to do with politics?’ 55 percent of the newspaper journalists say they’re liberal (12 percent say ‘very liberal,’ and 43 percent say ‘somewhat liberal’), and only 23 percent of their readers say they’re liberal (five percent say ‘very liberal,’ and 18 percent say ‘somewhat liberal’).

• “Sometimes the readers and journalists take diametrically opposed positions — as on the question: ‘Are you in favor of the way Ronald Reagan is handling his job as President?’ Journalists say ‘No’ by a 2-1 margin; readers say ‘Yes’ by about the same margin.”

The Media Elite Revisited

MediaWatch.

KEY FINDINGS:

• In 1992, when just 43 percent of the public voted Democrat Bill Clinton for President, 58 percent of editors surveyed voted for him.

• In 1996, a minority (49 percent) of the American people voted to reelect Clinton, compared to a majority (57 percent) of the editors.

• When asked “How often do journalists’ opinions influence coverage?” a solid majority of the editors (57 percent) conceded it “sometimes” happens while another 14 percent said opinions “often” influence news coverage. In contrast, only one percent claim it “never” happens, and 26 percent say personal views “seldom” influence coverage......snip~

http://archive.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics3.asp



So much for Thor's Bullshit about Media Bias.

 

Well, things are getting interesting.

 

You just got done saying that Judicial Watch hasn't done anything. Yet they make your kind.....the leftness release Documents that your kind don't want out in the public. That would be records of by your kind and whom you support.

So I didn't lie about it.....you did. When you made that asinine statement that Judicial Watch has done nothing. Now I just corrected that fake ass **** you pimped out to the public here.