SO WHAT? What do the numbers have to do with women's right to their own bodies?? Or abortion or anything else..???
If you have ever seen a homeless female then you would know how ugly they are. There is no natural attraction. So if they are fokking it is because they want to fokk. And homeless should not fokk. Neither should teens. They are not ready to be parents.
What part of " dumped" are you not getting? There are women out there living in cars with thier kids because the dead beat Dad either kicked them out or beat them up. And quite frankly it is not just the good looking ones on the game. When your last meal was two weeks ago then......
The stats are irrelevant You have a choice Are you going to overturn HIPPA and allow access to women's health records so as to ensure the abort was done for the "right" reason or are you going to respect thier privacy?
They will avoid HIPA completely and simply hire people (Preferably Good Christian Men) to physically inspect each woman for irregularities in their vagina.
I have extensive experience with homeless in the USA since my fraternity provides blankets for them and my security company escorts them off private properties. Homelessness is a separate problem not related to abortion. If you want to mix the two up and thereby mix yourself up too then you will be pretty mixed up by the time you are finished mixing these up @Bowerbird my dear Auzzie friend.
Well then, what do you have to say about the topic, which doesn't denigrate women with Really Stupid comments?
LoL stats are irrelevant! Why don't you just say "reality is irrelevant"! Hahahaha omg. We just want common sense abortion control.
Waiting periods, background checks, no abortions if you have a felony, an abortion registry. You know common sense measures to save lives.
Waiting periods !! WTF! Wait until what, it's viable!??? Until she changes her mind ??? Background checks ? For what? To see if she's good little girl? No terrorists can get abortions? Or they'll be forced to get an abortion??? OOOHH, she's got that shoplifting charge from ten years ago, no abortion for her!! She's a rabid rightie, no abortion for HER!!! Oh, she burnt dinner last night, no abortions for her. OH OH she got C on her test at school, no abortion for her!! WTF are you talking about? An abortion registry !!! OMG! If it effing legal why does it have to be in a registry...and then that whole medical records being private stuff YOU enjoy....good gawd… I asked for COMMON SENSE......your post displayed NONE.
So you don't believe you have a right to your own body ? Whose body is it if it isn't yours? THAT'S the issue, the core issue, the important point. Abortion, the right to your own body, shouldn't have to be "legal" or "illegal"...it's just a medical procedure that anyone should be able to have...
I believe you have a "right" to snort battery acid if you want. You have a right to sit in a room and shoot heroin for the next few years. It's your body. But that's clearly on a very different level to freedom of speech, freedom of association, etc. In the context of the original comment I meant I don't think it's a constitutional right, but your point brought up a better discussion.
My position on abortion cannot be more clear. If you missed it, I said that ones opinion of abortion stops where her uterus starts. When a particularly snarky member tried to claim that republicans want to take away a woman's rights, I simply pointed out how her party was no better. She used the term "Assaulted by a fetus" which is now my favorite line. Assault fetuses must be banned. It is funny that when someone wants to post a broad term like "Woman's rights" it suddenly becomes off topic when it exposes their hypocrisy. The right not to be raped or murdered has been attacked by Democrats here in the city of angels. I hope this was just a failed attempt at humor. Women have the right over their own bodies in civilized countries. Ireland recently changed their primitive ways.
Like I said @Doofenshmirtz if the fetus cannot be allowed to kill you then you should not be allowed to kill it.
I know what you said. I do have a question: If your opinion ever becomes law, and unwanted pregnancies resulted in more births, what do you propose we do with all these unwanted children?
That stupid question definitely sounds like a "Socratic dialectic" The fetus, as it grows and sustains it's life off the woman it's in, HARMS the woman and may even kill her. Since no one should be forced to sustain the life of another the woman has the right to stop this parasite in the only way she can. No one has to suffer injury without consent so a woman has a right to self defense in the only way possible, bye bye fetus Horsepuckey…..Socrates has nothing to do with everyone's right to their own body. What a stupid gratuitous insult...no one needs to study philosophy to know what rights are, or what self defense is, or what not being forced to sustain the life of another means...Well, they shouldn't have to because it really screws up logical thinking..
So you haven't thought things through. Only the baby takes its first breath, you stop caring? The dance of the sanctimonious may not be graceful, but it is entertaining.
Waiting periods should be required for "Assault fetuses" If you make a woman wait 10 days to protect the inner parts of her body from rapists, this is more than reasonable. If you really cared about women's rights, neither would be acceptable.
You dems want a woman to wait 10 days before allowing her to have control over what happens to her body. How are you any different?
Your reading skills are about average for a public school student @Doofenshmirtz . What I said -- to repeat it for you and any other slow learners -- is about HEARTBEAT. If the fetus has a heartbeat then it can logically and philosophically be politically granted human rights if the majority rules as such. Read it again a few times and maybe it will sink in, even for a poor reader raised in public schools.
