So, since the prosecutors couldn't mount a case for impeachment, the jurors should do it for them. On what planet?
The case wasn't proved in the grand jury phase so we can't look at testimony, documents or new information during the trial. On what planet.
A REAL TRIAL REQUIRES WITNESSES AND DOCUMENTATION to establish guilt or innocence. To deny is called a cover up!!
There already were witnesses, called by one side only in the house. Full on joke. They didn't do their job now they want the senate to do it for them. Fools.
I know; it's one of the most bizarre schemes that the political Left has ever concocted. No charges recognized under law and no evidence for the same and yet . . . an impeachment and then a trial over nothing.
The GOP impeached Clinton for lying about getting a BJ in a CIVIL LAW SUIT brought by Paula Jones which she won and received a cash payout.
That's called a witch hunt. No crimes committed--- even the allegations weren't crimes, so we're going on a fishing expedition to find a crime that didn't exist and ask a guy with a multi-million $$$ book deal to tell all about crimes ,,, even though the allegations aren't impeachable.
A phone call 20 people listened in on that only Vindman claimed was bad because Trump didn't use his talking points.