Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories!

Discussion in '9/11' started by rickmullenax, Apr 14, 2014.

  1. snakestretcher

    snakestretcher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    43,996
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are thousands of 'suspicious' videos made by people who just happened to be in the right place at the right time to document an event-youtube is filled with them. Besides which just about everyone today can make high quality video with their phone. No 'plane came out of a tower after it hit. Lots of debris, yes, but no 'plane. Furthermore the exterior of the WTC towers was largely cosmetic; the critical structural bits were inside so, yes, an aeroplane, strongly built to withstand stresses and travelling close to 500 mph could easily penetrate the exterior fabric of the building.

    Next; do you know how long it takes to make a complex CGI film? Footage of the collisions was on our TV screens within hours of the event so your suggestion that Hollywood was involved is ludicrous when the reality is that it can take months to complete even a short sequence.

    http://www.answers.com/Q/How_long_does_it_take_to_make_a_CGI_film
     
  2. snakestretcher

    snakestretcher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    43,996
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    1945; an aluminium B-25 Mitchell flew into the Empire State building at about 250mph. It smashed through seven (7) walls and there was very little of it left recognisable as an aeroplane.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YLWh8Rbp7o
     
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,945
    Likes Received:
    377
    Trophy Points:
    83
    well posers really should update all their worn out long ago trampled wackadoodle theories that they have not been able to prove. Not even one FFS. WOrse they cant even present a reasoned argument in support of their official wackadoodle theory. Which one do you think is real again?
     
  4. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,492
    Likes Received:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    63
    exactly,you owned them.:thumbsup:its comical they actually think an aluminum airliner can pass in and out of a steel framed high rise building and ignore how you can easily CGI a fake plane.Just ask steven spielberg.:roflol:
     
  5. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yeah ... it was all CGI ... you're a genius ...
     
  6. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    7,411
    Likes Received:
    2,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The exterior walls were largely cosmetic? Who told you that, Dick Cheney?

    I took a tour there many years ago, and the tour guide pointed out that the exterior walls of the towers were called "exo skeleton", and very much part of the structure. Such design features are fairly rare, but there are other examples in the world with those features.
     
  7. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They were not designed to withstand airline crashes and in fact did not
     
  8. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    so you're a no planer?
     
  9. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Video doesn't do debunking but tells us what people for or against the notion of an inside conspiracy have said or think. Sideshow attraction when I hoped for meat and potatoes.
     
  10. nastimarvasti

    nastimarvasti Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Just a totally false/dishonest claim.

    [video=youtube_share;1pvEge5HPJU]http://youtu.be/1pvEge5HPJU[/video]
     
  11. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A totally accurate claim as they were built before any airliners were invented.

    Before jumping in with something stupid learn what is being discussed.
     
  12. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,342
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Talk about stupid, in your desperate attempt to contradict an expert, you jump in with something amazingly stupid. At least try to read what you write before posting it.
     
  13. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For the slow we were not discussing the WTC.

    That is why your post is the one beyond stupid.

    Your " expert " has nothing to do with the pentagon.

    Keep up with what was being discussed or run along
     
  14. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    have you been drinking? ...
     
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The walls of the pentagon were built before jet airliners
     
  16. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    we were discussing the WTC ...
     
  17. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    negative I was responding to a post about the pentagon
     
  18. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,342
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah I know, airliners were not invented when the towers were built, I certainly can't keep up with that amazing fact because I'm too "slow". And the conversation started with:

    ... where I guess in your world WTC really stands for the Pentagon. And MY expert, you know, the one I own, really knows nothing and is probably not an expert even though he belongs to me. Do you do comedy on the side? If so, please keep your day job, just a suggestion.
     
  19. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What do you consider an airliner? ... you might want to do some research ...
     
  20. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,342
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah I could never figure out what an airliner is, I should go back to college where they give a course on Airliner 101. Friggin amazing some of the posts I read.
     
  21. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    sorry ... I thought I was quoting Soupnazi ...
     
  22. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The post you responded to was this one:

    The WTC was what was being discussed in the above post, of which, you quoted and the preceding shameful ruse has commenced.
     
  23. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Leslie Robertson (Reflections On The World Trade Center, NAE 2002) stated the following (from the abstract):

    "The two towers were the first structures outside of the military and nuclear industries designed to resist the impact of a jet airliner, the Boeing 707. It was assumed that the jetliner would be lost in the fog, seeking to land at JFK or at Newark. To the best of our knowledge, little was known about the effects of a fire from such an aircraft, and no designs were prepared for that circumstance. Indeed, at that time, no fireproofing systems were available to control the effects of such fires..."

    "...The events of September 11 ended the lives of almost 2,900 people, many of them snuffed out by the collapse of structures designed by me. The damage created by the impact of the aircraft was followed by raging fires, which were enormously enhanced by the fuel aboard the aircraft. The temperatures above the impact zones must have been unimaginable; none of us will ever forget the sight of those who took destiny into their own hands by leaping into space..."

    "...The buildings survived the impact of the Boeing 767 aircraft, an impact very much greater than had been contemplated in our design (a slow-flying Boeing 707 lost in the fog and seeking a landing field). Therefore, the robustness of the towers was exemplary. At the same time, the fires raging in the inner reaches of the buildings undermined their strength. In time, the unimaginable happened . . . wounded by the impact of the aircraft and bleeding from the fires, both of the towers of the World Trade Center collapsed..."

    http://www.nae.edu/File.aspx?id=7345
     
  24. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    7,411
    Likes Received:
    2,647
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, the towers were designed to be robust. Alas, apparently WTC7 wasn't, as it collapsed at free fall even without an airplane strike.
     
  25. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, that is a lie. It did not collapse at free fall and I've shown you the evidence, so why do you lie? Is calumny all 9/11 truth is capable of providing? Where's that common sense now?

    It seems you missed this little snippet of info:

    "At the same time, the fires raging in the inner reaches of the buildings undermined their strength. In time, the unimaginable happened . . . wounded by the impact of the aircraft and bleeding from the fires, both of the towers of the World Trade Center collapsed..."

    From the architect.
     

Share This Page