Debunking 911 Lies

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Sep 7, 2011.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,105
    Likes Received:
    393
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Are 911 debunkers scripted?

    Is it just my imagination or do these so called debunkers just have a debunker playbook that if truther says "a" debunker responds with "c" and so forth and so on?

    Ever notice how they always have "FACTS", not evidence like the rest of the world? Yet the greater majority of said "FACTS" are lucky if they rank as 1/2 truths? If any truth at all.

    Ever notice what happens when they have to answer the questions or they are taken off script? You can hear a pin drop. shhhh.

    Had anyone ever asked if these debunkers made it past intermediate school?

    Why is it they just cannot seem to get 101, well in some cases high school physics? Whats up with that?

    Anyone out here can help me understand "debunkers" because most of the time it seems like its about word games to them rather than science.

    Maybe if I understood them better we could all just get along.
     
  2. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I think you understand them very well! The "official" must be pushed....period. That's the agenda. Anything that interferes or differs with that "official" BS, must be attacked, stopped, at all costs. Honest discussion must be halted and the "official" BS must be substituted. The script is pretty tight and intolerance is not only accepted...it's encouraged. Specifics are ALWAYS a problem, and when specifics get too "specific", personal attacks are approved and encouraged. Ignoring problem areas are required and open discussion of problem areas is to be interrupted, discontinued, interfered with, attacked, and ridiculed.
    Yes...I think you have a pretty good handle on the "official" side of debunking.
     
  3. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No. Not that you would ever accept any evidence on that issue, because your mind is made up.

    It's not my fault the 9/11 Deniers keep repeating the same easily debunked horse(*)(*)(*)(*) for a decade now.

    You're saying 2+2=6. The fact that people always respond by saying, "No, you klod, it's 4," does not mean they're scripted. It just means there is an objective right answer to your query, and they have it.
    Facts are evidence.
    Can you provide an example of this? Of course you can't.
    Yes, many people have, and various people outside your 9/11 Denier cult have responded with their qualifications. You simply choose not to believe them.

    And then you perform this classic bit of 9/11 Denier nonsense: State a lie, but put a question mark at the end of it, so it doesn't seem like a lie.
    Case in point. Obviously, it's a flat-out lie that no one outside your cult has taken physics. In fact, I have previously told you, very recently, that I in fact took physics far into my university studies. But, like all reality, you deny, deny, deny, and continue to present lies like this in the form of questions.
    LOL... And what, exactly, have you presented as science? Bad animated gifs? YouTube videos?

    The science is so ridiculously settled that most of us have moved on. If you're not accepting the science by now, you never will, because you have a pathology that will prevent you from doing so: out-of-control confirmation bias.
    We won't get along until 9/11 Deniers accept reality, the reality that they are wrong.
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ever notice what happens when they have to answer the questions or they are taken off script? You can hear a pin drop. shhhh


    That's because 'taking it off script' usually entails making a claim so ludicrous,that it takes a while to get over our amazement that they actually made the claim.
     
  5. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    0
    True. It took me a good few months to even figure out what the hell the "no plane"/hologram people were even saying, they are so far in another realm of existence.
     
  6. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,932
    Likes Received:
    1,276
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think it's the majority of truthers that are clearly scripted.

    They regurgitate talking points.
    Look no further then Emmanuel Goldstein. That guy copies whole web pages into his post without any unique commentary. RWF and Koko are both guilty of starting threads with nothing more then a sentence and a link to a page they haven't even read. They are not alone.

    They are clearly not familiar with the positions they are supporting
    Micro nukes
    Energy weapons.
    Gravity
    Kinetics
    Structural mechanics
    Chemistry
    etc.

    They can not manage to stay on topic, deliver an original cogent point, or rebut the majority of obvious contradictions in their arguments. The only guy arguing here that I think even tries to hold his own only comes here to argue that the government doesn't have a lot of corroborating intelligence on the funding and planning stages of the event, which is for the most part, true.
     
  7. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,105
    Likes Received:
    393
    Trophy Points:
    83

    Do you have any proof?
     
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,105
    Likes Received:
    393
    Trophy Points:
    83

    you are kidding right?


    Is this a plane? Simple yes or no will do.


    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]
     
  9. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I tend to agree, especially on the bolded. I have my own problems on that front, but my issues are more with the potential involvement from a couple of foreign governments. I firmly believe the US government is doing some whitewashing on that front.

    Then again, that kind of topic isn't sexy, especially if you can't post some moronic photoshopped image or a youtube vid.
     
  10. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, I'm not kidding. It took me quite a while to wrap my head around someone so completely "out there" they seriously think that no planes hit the WTC.
    I can't answer the question without more information. All I see there is a grainy animated gif, which might have the Fox News logo on it, and something white in the background.

    To comment, I would need some information about the providence of this image. That is how actual evidence is analyzed, here in reality, unlike in 9/11 Denier land, where pixelated animated gifs are concrete and conclusive evidence of the greatest conspiracy ever committed.

    Instead of looking at ridiculous, possibly forged, useless gifs, why not look here: http://www.archive.org/details/911

    It's a painstaking collection of over 3,000 hours of footage surrounding the events of that day, from 20 different networks over seven days.

    Of course, in your delusion, every single one of these networks, in various countries, and all employees who were involved in these reports, are "part of the conspiracy," right?

    Oh, and the second picture is a waterfowl.
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,105
    Likes Received:
    393
    Trophy Points:
    83
    well you have no sworn witnessed affidavits of the event, from anybody!, and I have all these fake videos and pictures that were put on tv that you want the world to believe were real planes!


    There are people with tin foil hats then there are complete loonaticks.


    Anyone thinkd graphic planes can damage anything but their brain really has, well a few short of a full deck to be more than kind.


    apparently you failed to see the invincible beer can!

    [​IMG]
     
  12. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    0
    $100. 5 posts in a row.

    He'll never do it. Never.
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,105
    Likes Received:
    393
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I am not the one on trial here, your lying assed gubafia is on trial here.

    you have produced no affidavits, no evidence because it was all mopped up.

    why not come clean and tell the truth.

    The only way anyone can talk like that is if they believe that is a real plane.

    Even a 2 year old can see its a (*)(*)(*)(*) poor fake.
     
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sorry to tell you this koko,but the government And the scientists affiliated with it's findings have provided you with ALL the proof you need.


    Not OUR fault you don't like it,but it IS up to YOU to start providing proof,backed up with evidence.
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,105
    Likes Received:
    393
    Trophy Points:
    83

    the word probably is NOT proof

    like all you official story tellers, writing volumes of sht in the end is still (*)(*)(*)(*)
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sorry, but the official story is supplied with all the proof needed, what is needed from YOU is your proof to refute it...And so far,you've been coming up lacking
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,105
    Likes Received:
    393
    Trophy Points:
    83


    Oh man thats awesome! I have been looking for it for years!

    post it please so the rest of us can see it too.
     
  18. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Find it yourself, you're the one here calling it a lie...
     
  19. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,932
    Likes Received:
    1,276
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope. They're not.

    All these years and not one of your half baked theories have made enough sense to bring to a courtroom.

    That must sting.
     
  20. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,105
    Likes Received:
    393
    Trophy Points:
    83

    I never gave you or anyone here a theory.

    demolitions are not theoretical science.

    apparently you need to go to school on how the courts work as well.
     
  21. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Evidently you need to stop being so (*)(*)(*)(*)ed obtuse and just say what you mean
     
  22. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,105
    Likes Received:
    393
    Trophy Points:
    83

    I put up scientific facts, that provides anyone with knowledge of the matter enough information to come to the proper conclusions.

    [​IMG]
     
  23. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    <cough> scientific facts?,excuse me,I must laugh now.
     
  24. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,932
    Likes Received:
    1,276
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Next on the list of things that Koko can't do is play the semantics game. I didn't say scientific theories. Far from it. I said your theories. These theories are your opinions of what caused the collapse. On this point you've come out with quite a few hair brained ideas. None of which have a leg to stand on in a courtroom.

    Once again, you've proven that you're the last person who would be advising people to go back to school.

    You've not put up a single scientific fact.

    You were wrong about gravity.
    You were wrong about shear force.
    You were wrong about buckling.
    You were wrong about heat
    You were wrong about vaporization.
    You were wrong about "nuclear reactions"

    The list keeps growing, but you keep coming back to prove how much more wrong you can be.
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15,105
    Likes Received:
    393
    Trophy Points:
    83

    so when are the official story spinners going to figure out the difference between claims and facts eh?

    you can make volumes of claims none of which you even have evidence to back up UNLESS you present it out of context but then that makes it s worth less strawman.

    oh well back to school with ya al.


    well unless you can explain how those big thick columns turned into tiny sticks as see in my last post.

    here find it in your script book:

    http://www.debunking911.com/
     

Share This Page