Dem senator warns Supreme Court of 'revolution' if Roe v. Wade is overturned

You're simply making excuses for Schumer's inflammatory rhetoric and revealing your hyperpartisan ship which prevents you from actually acknowledging his inflammatory rhetoric.

Along with your typical giant dose of projection

 

Schumer was pissed. I didn't hear anything 'incendiary'. Nope.

YOu want incendiary? THIS is incendiary, specific calls to violence




Everyone get's pissed once in awhile, but what Schumer was pissed about wasn't a lie, and what dems don't do is get a mob so riled up in a juggernaut of rage based on total lies that they attack the capital

Nothing Dems have done compares to the threats to national security incurred by Donald Trump.

You do not have a leg to stand on on this point.

 

I bet you support BLM though right? And the fire at a pro life building? And scaring judges to rule outside of the constitution?

 

the judge said this to Senate Democrats, it was just a play on words him repeating it to the judge

 

did Trump ever pay for any of their legal fees like he promised, I wonder?

 

I support everyone's right to protest, peacefully.

 

And I will agree with that all day long. That is one thing we will never disagree on

But BLM was not always peaceful, nor was the vandalism at pro life facilities

 

The only ones committing crimes are criminals, and they are always a very small faction. No dem supports criminals.

Where you guys go wrong is when we assert we understand BLM's motives, they are protesting cops shooting unarmed blacks and getting away with it, and confuse that act with condoning illegal acts, and conflate that with black on black crime, which is a different unrelated subject and a red herring.

People on the right do this every day of the week that I've been on this forum, on some post, somewhere.

No Democratic president has inspired a mob to attack the capitol, (let alone anything else) and shout 'hang the vice president', and put up a gallows, and attempt to delay or stop the 1/6 state's certifications of the President.

Where the right goes wrong is to trivialise and/or diminish the gravity and significance of what occured on 1/6, and the many acts by Trump that led up to that particular juggernaut of rage for which he is responsible, so says McCarthy and McConnell, both leaders of their respective caucuses.

 

Actually, several prominent Dems certainly do "support" criminals by "understanding" and sympathizing with them and calling for their release from prison. Rashida Tlaib is the worst, supporting the closure of all federal prisons.

https://thedispatch.com/p/the-ghost-of-defund-comes-for-rashida?s=r

I would say that all the people screaming outside the Justices' homes demanding they vote to keep Roe, with bullhorns,
are democrats, if not elected to office. The federal statute that they are violating has been cited already.

I don't understand your tu quoque reference to the January 6 riots. Every conservative here to my knowledge has supported the prosecution of the rioters. Many of us have rebuked Trump, though we are, as we must be, mindful of the First Amendment and his calls to peacefully make our voices heard, or words to the effect. He didn't warn any elector that he would be "reaping a whirlwind" by certifying the results.

 

so this is your idea of criminal activity? Give me a break.

If you think you can define what it means to be a Democrat from one member of the extreme wing, think again.
I've been on this forum for a couple of years and most of those on the right from what I can tell appear to defend Trump and trivialize the significance of what occured on 1/6.

"reaping a whirlwind" did not inspire one democrat to bash capitol police offers on the head, ever..

But Trump's words did.

 

No, it's my idea of "supporting" criminals, which you said the left doesn't do. It does.

We wouldn't be pushing back against.your side if you hadn't run wild with preposterous allegations of collusion, Nazism, the urinating prostitutes, and so on. You go too far in your allegations. When there's any kind of pushback, we are called fascist enablers.

None of us make excuses for the Capitol rioters. But when it comes to the BLM destruction, we are suddenly asked to look at the root causes (systemic racism)

Trump did not inspire anyone to assault a police officer. He specifically said "peacefully." So that's just false. If you don't think police had an ally in Trump, ask
a police officer!

 

You'll need to substantiate that allegation.

And by 'the left does', I'll need proof of a broad swath section of Dems supporting criminals.

No declarations, just sources for the claim.

 

is this coming from the "lock her up!, lock her up!" party

 

That was never a platform of any party.

 

Dem senator warns Supreme Court of 'revolution' if Roe v. Wade is overturned.

Government by threat. Does anybody see a problem with this approach? I guess we deserve what we are getting.

 

I didn't say anything about a broad swath of Dems. I said several prominent Dems, citing Rashida Tlaib specifically, who happens to be leftist. And I gave my source, though I dont know why that was necessary since she was called on it and repeated it. She is not representative of the Democratic Party, but she certainly is representative of the Left. And the Left is inarguably sympathetic with criminals over law enforcement and law. It's just disingenuous to claim otherwise.

 

Another Democrat -- surprise, surprise -- warning the Supreme Court that it had better not overturn Roe because that would be unpopular. With Whirlwind Schumer, that makes at least two, right? Right??

We do not need courts if all we are going to do is govern by sticking our fingers in the wind and quivering in the face of mobs.

I hope she doesn't actually have a law license. If she does, it should be revoked

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/politics/dem-senator-revolution-roe-wade-overturned.amp

 

And like Hillary, the left wants to allow all criminals to go free. Ask any leftist DA.

 

All the ones that supported Rittenhouse being beat with weapons and thought he shouldn’t have been allowed to defend himself from violent rioters says a lot about the democrat party

 

None of the extremes on the left define, or represent, the left. Biden, Schumer, and Pelosi, are the ones who represent Democrats.

NO one says everything I agree with, but their policies are pretty much representative of the left.

And, in my view, I don't think any democrat supports criminal activity.

What the right does, often, is twist words to forward a right wing agenda.

I mean, I will state that I understand why BLM protests, but someone on the right will twist that to state that I support looting and murder, which is nonsense. If you are capable of doing that, then your assertions do not have credibility.

However, on the right, the extreme wing is much more prominent.

a number of republicans across america are proposing extreme legislation.

 

She worse than just a Leftist:

Surprise: Jihad Terror Financiers Organized Campaign Events for Rashida Tlaib:

She's a Democrat.

​

“Two men who held key positions at nonprofit groups that were found liable in a Hamas terror financing scheme helped organize campaign fundraising events for Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) in 2018.”

The representative of terrorists in the US Congress.

Tlaib’s campaign event organizers “were associated with a network of nonprofit groups that were found liable by a federal jury in 2004 for financing the terrorist slaying of an American teenager, David Boim, at a bus stop in the West Bank in 1996. A federal judge ordered the three groups to pay Boim’s parents a $156 million judgment for funding Hamas, a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization.” Getting a judgment was one thing, however, and getting payment was quite another: “the groups — the Holy Land Foundation, the American Muslim Society, and the Islamic Association for Palestine — never paid up. They shut down shortly after they were ordered to pay the landmark judgment to the Boim family. The Holy Land Foundation ultimately had its monetary assets seized by the United States, and five of its leaders were sentenced to decades in prison in 2008, for providing material support to Hamas.”

She chants the slogan of Hamas "From the River to the Sea" that seeks the complete eradication and destruction of Israel.

"Tlaib’s big booster was Rafeeq Jaber, who was “identified as a member of the ‘Hosting Committee’ for a Tlaib campaign fundraiser in July 2018. The event was paid for by Tlaib’s congressional campaign. Jaber was also filmed sitting in the front row of an intimate Tlaib campaign fundraising event in March 2018.” Jaber wasn’t your average campaign financier; he had been president of two of the groups that had been held liable in the Boim judgment, the American Muslim Society and the Islamic Association for Palestine. Jaber “testified that the two groups, while under his control, worked to ‘promote Holy Land Foundation in every way we can’ and also distributed pro-Hamas documents, including an August 2001 editorial that advocated 'martyrdom' operations and the murder of Jewish people.”

 

You mean like the 1/6 insurrection?

 

Yep. Or you take a flight to an exotic place and combine it with a vacation. Lets call it "aborcation" shall we. Medical vacations already exist for plastic surgeries, dental care and other procedures.

 

That's good - soon there won't be any Americans left.

 

I understand that leftists are big on trying to redefine words right now (e.g. recession, woman, insurrection, etc), but January 6th was a rowdy protest, not an "insurrection", leftists' butchering of the English language notwithstanding.