Democrats new plan: Impeach Kavanaugh and Trump

PARTY BEFOR COUNTRY is not a new agenda for Democrats.

Remember this?:

Dumbasses.

Yes, Dims should have put jobs and the economy first - that was the top priority of the American people in 2009. However, the power hungry Alinskyites in the Democratic party couldn't help themselves - the first thing they focused on was their FullRetardCare power grab. Jobs and the economy were things that Obama & Co. "pivoted" to when political expedience forced them to divert their attention and activity away from fundamentally transforming the United States.

As usual and once again, we find Democrats with their priorities in the wrong place - on themselves, not the American people.

Like I said - PARTY BEFORE COUNTRY.

It's a move that illustrates 1) the priorities of the American people aren't the priorities of the Democrat party (no wonder most Americans think they're out of touch) and 2) they haven't learned anything from the last time they put their own interests before those of the American people.

I think it's a GREAT move on the part of the new Dim leadership in the House precisely because it's not a smart move. I heartily encourage them to fall on their dull swords...

 

Debbie Wasserman Schultz and many others...knowing how corrupt the democratic party is, who knows if there were even FISA court judges involved? They could have signed or forged fake names and signatures.

 

What lie are we discussing.

 

Typical Democratic bluff stuff. Just in case they don't know this (Which doesn't surprise me) You can't impeach a confirmed SCOTUS for lying to the Senate. You can only impeach him for actions while he is SCOTUS. Laughable

 

It really wouldn't surprise me at this point. It would make sense though. For example, Dim leaders professing to impeach Kavanaugh. Either they don't know that you can't impeach a confirmed SCOTUS for lying to the Senate that already confirmed him and can only impeach for acts while SCOTUS or they are knowingly lying to their base for votes. Actually, either scenario wouldn't surprise me in the least given the fact that no Dims in this forum know that.

 

Even if the Dim House could impeach they will never get a super-majority in the Republican Senate to convict. They would be completely wasting their time and taxpayer money.

They know this, but to the Alinskyites in the Democrat party this doesn't matter - the power is in the accusation or slander. It's not necessary for the accusation/slander to be factual or have any merit.

Personally, I think it's a foolish, tone-deaf and self-destructive strategy that will blow up in their faces, but I don't think that matters to the Dims and it certainly doesn't matter to the lunatic fringe base they have to pander to.

 

Says who?

 

It's pretty amusing how only the RW nutballs have this "inside knowledge" of the Democrats' nefarious plans.

 

You don't cite your source, and you don't know the law. Yes, he can be impeached for anything Congress wants to impeach him. You can't show differently.

 

This is where this is headed with today's nut left. Not willing to accept election results that go against them, it would surprise me if going forward they tried to impeach any justice appointed by the opposing party.

 

They know....they're just hoping to get away with it by the GOP not knowing.

The dems aren' t stupid, they're just corrupt. They're completely motivated by winning at all cost and will try anything hoping the American people and GOP are too trusting or stupid to believe they would even consider election fraud or as in this case create a COUP with hope of taking down the president. Makes one wonder how long this has been going on BEFORE Trump ran for president.

If not for election fraud, would Mitt Romney have been the REAL winner in 2012? If memory serves, It was very close.

 

Only if there is strong evidence supporting their claims. If they go off on a tangent with no evidence, it will help Trump and cost them seats in the 2020 election.

 

No kidding.

"Impeachment Talk" is RW BS from the Fever Swamp ether.

The Dem House approach will be committees and subpoenas.

 

Agreed. Popular opinion is in favor of impeaching the liar, but House Democrats are not presently planning impeachment. I figure this will only potentially change after Mueller makes a report. In that event, it would not only be Democrats anyway.

All Republicans have now is fear and hate. They're a terribly negative party under Trump, though the process had also begun under Obama.

 

Judges are different from elected officials

Article III, Section 1, judges “shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour.”

 

Article III Section One states that "the Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior. You can't become a SCOTUS under Article III until after the confirmation process. If you confirm a SCOTUS even if you have opposing claims during the process, he is confirmed and can only be removed for activities from that point in. Hence the whole reason for the confirmation process.

 

They will never say and perjury has to be knowingly tell a lie of material value to the proceeding. A simple disagreement, I drank a lot, no you drank A lot, is not perjurious.

 

Sure I can. Article III Section One states that "the Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior. You can't become a SCOTUS under Article III until after the confirmation process. If you confirm a SCOTUS even if you have opposing claims during the process, he is confirmed and can only be removed for activities from that point in. Hence the whole reason for the confirmation process.

 

Says who?

 

I asked to explain to the Dim Dems Article III Section One states that "the Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior. You can't become a SCOTUS under Article III until after the confirmation process. If you confirm a SCOTUS even if you have opposing claims during the process, he is confirmed and can only be removed for activities from that point in. Hence the whole reason for the confirmation process.

 

Yep and even if they did hold an impeachment, which could then be refused and overturned by the SCOTUS because of Article III Section one, the example I gave, the former hostile roommate say Kavanaugh drank A lot not just a lot would not perjurious anyway and not material to anything.

 

Is that where this country is headed? Are we going to investigate everyone looking for crimes, or are we going to abide by the constitution and the laws of our country.

 

Agreed

 

Polls.

 

I'm confused as to what you are referring. Unless I missed something they have made it pretty clear throughout the midterms unless you are talking about something other than Impeach 45, Impeach SCOTUS, Mueller investigation, resist, and Russians