Did Trump or anyone in his campaign collude or attempt to collude?

Yes Russia, Are you suggesting Russia didn't launch a cyber offensive to interfere with the election process?
Did you miss all those INDICTMENTS?

Yes Collusion. Did you miss Manafort handing over a critical campaign work product valued at tens of millions to his Russian "associate"?

Neither of those facts are fake news. Jumping to conclusions and fake news - here from a guy who thinks Uranium One is actually a treasonous scandal.

Much like love, the advice you give is equal to the advice you make.

 

Hurry! Tell Mueller!

 

Newsflash, he knows.

 

Oh, then it's not collusion.

Thanks!

 

NO COLLUSION

 

No just conspiracy and cooperation.

 

Haaahahahahaaa!

Too bad your hoax failed.

 

Since when does "if its not a crime, its okay" become the standard for presidential behavior?

Since when do federal investigators ignore "probable cause"?

Boy I guess all those malicious accusations you and your dear leader made against mueller, attacking his integrity and motivation, was just kidding, now that his report has been completed.

 

It's a hoax.

The hoaxters most certainly committed crimes.

Sedition is a crime.

 

Nope, nothing and in fact turned down offers.

 

As I've stated repeatedly on this forum, I personally doubt Trump's innocence, but I will abide by the Mueller findings. So, I do.

 

First of course you have to prove it was fake. Then we will answer your question.

 

No not really. A short summary that didn't exonerate Trump. Just said there wasn't enough evidence for a fotrmal charge of collusion.

On the good side it did expose Trump's endlesss claims that Russia didn't try to influence the election as a lie.

 

Mueller didn't say Trump was innocent!

 

Actually not enough evidence to prove collusion.

 

You think the entire document is going to reverse what was said in the short summary? You guys are getting desperate.

 

The walls are closing in on the bogus collusion story.

 

"No not really. A short summary that didn't exonerate Trump. Just said there wasn't enough evidence for a fotrmal charge of collusion."

Lern too reed.

"The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/24/us/politics/barr-letter-mueller-report.html

 

Yeah no evidence of collusion, at all. But yet you still believe, without evidence, there was, just amazing

 

No YOU have to prove it was true and accurate, did Mueller find that? Did he charge Cohen for lying about going to Prague? What's been vindicate and proved true in the Dossier?

 

I am sure you can do your own research. A lot of the dossier has been vindicated. Some has not ncluding the golden showers although given Trump's vindictive nature even that doesn't seem too far fetched. Got to be some Reason Trump keeps kissing Putin's butt.

 

Didn't say that. We know for sure there was attempted collusion and we do know that Mueller said apparently there wasn't enough evidence to prove it but that is still a long way ftom vindication.

 

Hilarious, I need to " lern too reed". And by the way that is Barr not Mueller.

 

We haven't even seen the short summary . Are you paying attention. All we have seen is Barr's letter.

 

OK. Do you think the full report is going to contradict Barr's letter?

The evidence has been investigated the investigators concluded that there is no evidence of collusion.

MSNBC has been lying to you.
CNN has been lying to you.
Adam Schiff has been lying to you.