So let me see if I understand you correctly. You say you have evidence that the Democrats colluded with Russia but you cannot produce any evidence. And you agree that the dossier shows no collusion between the Democrats and the Russians even though you cited the dossier as evidence of collusion And you want that collusion investigated even though you claim a candidate colluding with Russia isn't illegal. To quote you: Being elected to office has always proved to be highly profitable for the Clinton's and since the only collusion with foreign agents and Russia occurred through the DNC and Clinton campaign where are the indictments? How are you going to have indictments if the collusion wasn't illegal?