Disney Executive Producer Admits to ‘Gay Agenda,’ ‘Adding Queerness’ Wherever She Could

Disney Executive Producer Admits to ‘Gay Agenda,’ ‘Adding Queerness’ Wherever She Could

They really are after our children and even brag about it!

Parents are going to have to say NO! to this grooming of children in schools and children's programming.



During a staff meeting on Florida’s recent enactment of the Parental Rights in Education bill, an executive producer at Disney said she was advancing a “not-at-all-secret gay agenda” to insert queerness into children’s animation.

Latoya Raveneau, executive producer for Disney Television Animation, talked about how the studio’s treatment of her progressive ideas defied her negative expectations of the company, in a video obtained by journalist Christopher Rufo. Instead of vetoing her pitches for LGBTQ-friendly Easter eggs or overt references in her series, Disney gladly accepted and included them, she claimed.

https://news.yahoo.com/disney-executive-producer-admits-gay-224509498.html

 

Grooming is the intent. That's why people are lying about the "don't say gay" bill. There's only one reason you would want to oppose teaching children about sexuality and that's because you want to teach them to live a lifestyle that's beneficial to the abuser. Honest people know better though.

 

What does 'they're after our children' mean? That they are trying to convince children to be gay? That if a beloved disney character was openly gay that the children would want to be like them? Or would it teach children tolerance and inclusion at an early age?

 

Here's what's gonna happen.

Stocks are gonna take a hit. Ratings and viewership to their new movies is going to go down.

Investors will do an evaluation and either take the hit financially because my woke stuff! Or they are going to pivot away from this.

The problem is that gayness isn't something you can draw. You will have to actively show it. And I kind of think that parents may have an issue with Disney having two dudes or two woman locked in a passionate heroic kiss like you would see in their original cartoon movies.

So that's gonna be a bit of a shell shock for parents who will likely just avoid taking their young children to go watch.

 

It would encourage them to monkey see monkey do.

Children are malleable. We tell them that Santa Claus is real and they believe it. If they see Prince Adam make out with another dude, they will copy it. Having no desire to kiss men, they will just assume that's the norm and do it. They may find out later on down the road that they actually don't like men...or maybe they've just assumed that's the normal thing to do and continue to do it because taught at an early age.

Gay is not optimal. Sorry. You can't procreate in a gay coupling. We need to procreate to continue the human species. We should teach tolerance towards gay people but not encourage children to be gay. Gayness will always be the sub optimal outcome for the survival of the human species, or society/culture. As such our culture and society should always encourage the optimal coupling and relationships. Man with a woman. While at the same time teaching tolerance and acceptance for those who wish to have different relationships.

But w/e.

 

And why would this bother you if it did. You are completely ok with them showing a man and woman but if it’s two same sex it’s now “bad”?

The world is not having issues with populating itself.

 

Actually population replacement is down in all civilized first world nations fella. This ****? Doesn't help our cause.

 

But it’s ok for gay kids to see men and women kiss but not ok for straight kids to see two men kiss? Lol

 

What cause? We don’t need more people. We got plenty.

 

It’s crazy that people see gay characters and immediately call that grooming but don’t bat an eye when it is a a heterosexual one.

No one is lying about the FL bill containing provisions that will most likely be abused. Refusing to read the bill and it’s applications isn’t really a position of integrity.

 

How do you teach “tolerance” by banning their existence in media, banning their discussion in schools and banning their basic rights?

How is that “tolerance”?

 

Yes. Because we want to encourage social norms towards the most optimal outcomes at a young age, where children are highly impressionable. As I've explained gayness or trans are sub optimal and more of a detriment towards society if we want society to continue on.

I have no problem with gay people taking lead roles in more adult/grown up entertainment.

And of course, tolerance should be encouraged.

 

If we want our society to persist on, then we would do best repopulated within our society as opposed to needing to replace our population with people from outside of our society who may not share our societal values and as such over time would alter our society in a direction you may not like.

 

I dunno, in some wacky tobacky world of normalcy I seemed to have been taught to tolerate and be respectful towards people without needing to dive into sexual preferences.

Crazy town!

 

Gayness is statistically irrelevant as far as population goes. Women’s rights are more of a hindrance on birth rates.

 

Mickey's girlfriend is Minnie, Donald's is Daisy, and Goofy had Clarabelle and the kids watching still grew up gay. I don't think it is about trying to encourage kids to be gay. It is probably about showing them a realistic representation of society's relationships. If you oppose Disney showing a gay relationships should all Disney characters no longer have love interest? That would kills all of the prince and princess storylines.

Is Beauty and the Beast the reason bestiality exist?

 

What is our society? Anyone here is part of our society by definition
the aggregate of people living together in a more or less ordered community.

 

Disney used to promote dead parents so I think this is an improvement.

 

Gayness percentage has only been growing and will continue to grow the more it is encouraged at younger ages. The more it grows the more of a problem it becomes with regards to society population persisting on.

I do agree that woman's rights has been a huge detriment to population replacement decreasing drastically as well. The more progressed we become the weaker we get

Ironic. Huh?

 

Gayness is growing for the same reason the 1930s saw a rise in left handed people. We decided to accept it and people stopped pretending to be something they aren’t.
Maybe if you have to take peoples rights or tell them to deny who they are for society to operate how you want, it’s not a good model.

 

Do you think it is respectful and tolerant to ban all representation and discussion of a minority group?

 

Are you trying to suggest that children are not impressionable?

 

This thread isn't about denying rights towards gay people. It's in regards to popularizing gayness in our children's entertainment. Children. Who are highly impressionable.

 

Not so impressionable that they’re gonna change their sexual orientation based on a Disney show.

 

No but you just admitted the society you want is held back by women’s rights. That should be a red flag that maybe what you want is self serving and unhealthy.