Drag kids: outrage over 9 year-old drag queen and other sexualized children

as a ratio of pedophiles among homosexual men vs pedophiles among straight men, homsoexuals are 14x higher.

Hate the facts all that you want. What you do about it is the real tell.

We as a society need to realize that sexual deviancies such as wanting gay-sex, diddle little kids or cross dress are mental illnesses and need to treat them as such.

 

You will find the posts further down the thread.

 

I really disagree with these comparisons of adult males like in the church or power mad politicians abusing women or children to this. Leftists are doing what they do best here and it's point the other finger and Tit for Tat.

I do find the comparison of very young girls with insane mothers living vicariously through their daughters to be fair and just as damaging as this insanity is to this young boys situation. Pageant moms are relentless in driving into their daughters minds that all that matters is their weight, makeup, hair, etc IE purely skin deep qualities at an age where it is guaranteed to warp their sense of self worth for the rest of their lives.

So that's why I disagree here. There is nothing to suggest as you claim that he is just having fun. Look at him. His makeup and hair and dress is professionally done. The article states he was also singing and dancing in a sexual manner and here is the worst part.... He is getting a ton of full blown drag/gay/sexual support and approval from someone/s in his family unit. Kids live for approval. Louder the better. It's abhorrent to do this to a kid. Just like with young girls moms it's going to mold him into their image and dreams. Guaranteed long term repercussions and it's child abuse.

Kids should just be kids. Let them figure out their sexuality awkwardly like normal in their teens like the rest of us. Straight or gay doesn't matter.

 

I agree that we need to worry about the old white guys, but that is another topic for another day. It wouldn't make sense to post about a 9 year-old drag queen in a thread about an old white man molesting children, so why does the reverse make sense?

Also, when did anyone say anything about drag queens molesting children? I certainly never suggested that they were doing that. I (along with many others here) are suggesting that it is highly inappropriate and perhaps abusive to dress up a 9 year-old boy like he's a 29 year-old burlesque performer at the strip club. Abuse doesn't have to be physical or even sexual. There is mental and psychological abuse, and these types of actions can certainly qualify.

I never suspected the drag queens at the library of molesting the kids either. I just think that an elementary school kid hasn't even hit puberty yet, and there's no need for him to encounter a regular stripper, let alone one that is clearly a man dressed as a woman. If the kid grows up to be a drag queen, then more power to him. But don't force it on him before he even gets to junior high.

 

The thread is about a rather specific topic. Why does every thread have to turn into a situation where people go out of their way to bash Christians? We can certainly create threads for those topics, which I agree need to be addressed.

 

This is the evil that needs to be thwarted by the Bible Thumpers:

"We build confidence, resilience, and community for transgender and gender-variant youth and their families through camp experiences."
https://www.camparanutiq.org/

Egads! They're helping non-straight youth build a sense of community and self-confidence! Quick, everyone! Get yer pitchforks!

 

When you're 9 years old, you're not any of that stuff because you're not thinking about sex. 13 is obviously a different story, but let's not kid ourselves about elementary school children being so sexual.

 

I don't think it's about sex in particular. It's the fear mongers who keep trying to jump to that. Children do have gender identity before they hit puberty.

 

What's erotic?

 

^ Thread win.

 

^ Thread win #2.

 

Sure you would, in the hope that the greater evil will be preserved for the sake of the lesser evil.

Don't kid yourself. The diabolical forces behind "transgenderism" are behind homosexuality as well.

I don't see any point in that, unless it somehow leads to insane judges and politicians being thrown out of office, and the public embarrassment of those who imagine that instilling a fraudulent sense of confidence in the mentally ill can result in anything but corruption of the confidence of decent people.

 

Wtf are you on about? Sexualising any child is disgusting but clearly you think that dressing 5 year old girls to make them look like 20 years old is ok (lesser evil)

 

Do you actually know **** about mental illness? I really don't think you do. I think you're completely ignorant and pulling a lot of godawful opinions out of your ass because you think quite highly of yourself despite your actual abilities not warranting it.

Mental illness isn't any psychological phenomenon that is uncommon or rare. Every diagnostic manual in the psychiatric profession, from the DSM to the to the ICD-10, advises against diagnosing something as a mental illness if it does not impair functioning or happiness, so as to prevent harmless quirks from being responded to by doping people up and treating them like they're insane.

Transgender people do not suffer because they are transgender. Trans people who transition widely report that transitioning makes them feel comfortable in their own bodies for the first time and a sense of intense psychological relief. Transition, of course, is the social and medical process of beginning to live as the gender you were not designated at birth.

You may consider the kind of things that actually do tend to make people face psychological distress. I imagine that, when you think about this, you imagine conditions like isolation, being terrified of people finding out of who you are, being widely considered a freak, etc. You know, the effects of the kind of attitudes towards trans people that you hold and contribute to.

So it really ****ing rings hollow when you pretend that you give a **** about these people or that you don't want them to die considering how gleefully complicit you are in promoting the ideology that regards them as subhuman.

I know that you think you aren't prejudiced and I don't give a ****. I think that your opinions make you a significantly worse person for holding them and I want you to know that. That you are factually wrong and that you are ethically reprehensible are directly related.

 

@sec

First off, do you have a quote from a respectable scientific source to back up your lies, or is this something you gotta off of infowars or out of some religious rag or right wing think tank? Second off male homosexuality is the attraction to grown adult men. Pedophilia is the attraction to youth. Gay males do not want boys, they want grown ass men. If you spent any time in the gay community instead of getting your information from liars and con men you would know boys are not invited.

As a matter of fact the desire to shave an adult to appear youthful and more pre puberty is something practiced by heterosexual men and often imposed on women to make them appear younger than puberty so as to be more attractive to straight heterosexual men. Gay guys love big old muscular men with big old adult cocks. Shaving is often seen as a negative for gay men as they like body hair because it is considered masculine. That is common reality. Any advertising exec can tell you that beards and ruggedness are masculine and those are post puberty.

So you are a ****ing liar. You have done zero talking to gay guys. Your facts are a load of bullshit.

 

If the kid wishes to play dress up then let him. He does not need your insecurities imposed upon him for doing what he did. That is your hangup dude. If you are afraid of make up and women's clothing because it has girl cuties that will make you less of a man that is your mental dysfunction. It simply is not true. If the child is enjoying themselves and willing to do so for fun then no damage done.

 

As a person who has done the female burlesque thing you are literally wearing more clothes than most women and girls who are dressed fine in the Florida Sun. Really there are a ton of clothes and that older style used frills and fabrics to create a feminine idea rather than nudity and sexuality. There is far less chance of a person exposing a private part being dressed in burlesque attire. It is associated with sexuality because in the days when it was used for tantalizing an audience sexually women were much more modest and covered up. Now it is a costume. That is because there is so much to it that the boy would have to undo a number of straps and devices in order to take a leak. The clothing can be quite warm and uncomfortable in the heat because there tends to be a lot to it. Certainly a lot more than a pair of cut off daisy duke shorts and a sports brah as would be acceptable for a female to wear. Certainly more than a bathing suit and open chest he would have if he went swimming or to the beach.

So let us get real. He was well covered up and made up. Much more than boys on the beach which is acceptable. He is wearing frilly lace and make up. That is not really going to harm him or expose his privates for sexual predators to fap to. The discomfort comes from him wearing very feminine clothing and not from sexualization. Modern female hookers do not dress like that and they are the ones peddling sex. So let us not make up reasons we are offended. It makes some men uncomfortable because feminization makes some men uncomfortable. If it does not make the boy uncomfortable and he is having fun with it then let him be a kid.

 

Drag queens can definitely be grouped in with other erotica.

I don't think the level of sexuality is necessarily directly linked to the amount of skin being shown. Let me ask you this...what's more sexual, a topless woman or a woman who is topless but with pasties on her nipples? I think the pasties are definitely more sexual. Similarly, I think a gorgeous woman in a sexy burlesque outfit is going to come across as more sexual than an average looking woman in booty shorts.

 

That is a nice opinion but it is hardly anything more. For a Muslim man in a country where women show no skin ankles may be considered sexual. Really what you are talking about is a cultural definition of sexualization, but what if that is simply not the boy's culture? If it is not something taught to him to be sexual then he isn't thinking of it sexually and there for there is no objective sexualization to act upon. In this case the sexualization problem is clearly your own mental issue as you are the subject who finds it wrong. So fix yourself and do not worry about the boy until you can make a case of objective sexualization which would be harming the boy.

 

You think what I'm saying is harming the boy? That's pretty laughable to me. If what you're saying is true, then I guess Saudi Arabia must allow burlesque performances?

Throwing out a bunch of big words doesn't make something right. Some women wear sports bras to be sexy, but others just wear them to be comfortable or because they are practical. I don't think anyone is wearing burlesque attire for those reasons.

 

That is just your opinion. Obviously the boy is enjoying it even though it might not be practical. Not everything a human does that is enjoyable is practical. Sorry, but you are just going to have to deal with the fact it is not hurting him even though you might not care to do it. That is the beauty of this world. I think beer is pisswater, and although there are arguments beer is unhealthy many people find it refreshing. So I am not going to ban it. Unlike beer, wearing women's clothing does not physically cause the boy any harm. So if he is happy doing it you can have your opinions of not enjoying it yourself, but let him do as he has fun doing.

 

There is not erotic about a guy wearing a dress, not to mention about a boy wearing a dress.
The dress could be erotic. But just your random normal every dress... not erotic who wears it.

 

That's not an intelligent question.

Actually what's clear is that you find it much easier to twist my words than to find fault with them.

What I'm missing is a reason to care.

 

I mean, if you don't care about how oblivious you are, that's on you.

 

Kinda creepy.

But if the kids want to do it? Okay.

If their parents made them/strongly encouraged them to do it? Okay.

But it's hardly the end of the world.