Everything's under control...

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Mar 18, 2012.

  1. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    "unofficial" and unimpressive. What "may have happened" isn't indicative of what actually happened in any fashion (but about as credible as anything else "official" I suppose). You all say "what if" and it's credible, and we say "what if" and it isn't credible. The intelligent reader gets it.
     
  2. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,392
    Likes Received:
    249
    Trophy Points:
    83
    (from post #6)
    You can keep people from seeing the evidence by censoring the info we post. Here's an example
    http://www.booktalk.org/the-us-government-planned-and-carried-out-9-11-t6222.html

    I started the above thread with the username Cosmored. Post #1 had the same info that's in post #1 of this thread.
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746

    The discussion was moving right along and the pro-official version posters were having a hard time obfuscating the info and their success rate was probably close to zero. Finally, the moderator deleted all of my posts including post #1 which had all of the important info. Notice that my name is mentioned in some of the other posts.

    The moderator did the same thing with some other threads I'd started and a few others were simply deleted.
     
  3. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I said it was an independent study, with evidence to back it up. That's exactly what it is.

    Not official, not from the US. Got any evidence to refute the findings of these engineers?
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm beginning to get tired of your constant whine about being censored, and posting here under annother name is against the rules of the board..THAT's why your posts were 'deleted' most likely
     
  5. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A recap, for those following along.

    I said:
    You replied:
    So I did:

    Then you said:

    I showed my evidence and my source. Can you supply any evidence to refute it, or challenge it?
     
  6. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The source is important.

    LOL, that thread is a great read. :popcorn: That was quite an ass whooping Scott/cosmored took over there.
     
  7. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I'm beginning to thing you're a bot with your canned responses.
     
  8. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, you would certainly know what to look for so, you obviously know I'm nothing of the sort. I'm beginning to think you're...well...you already know what I think. It's in your weekly handout.
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Everything is a conspiracy.

    Eeeeeeeverything.
     
  10. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Don't need to.

    It's called computer MODELING for a reason.
     
  11. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A computer does nothing without human input, I can certainly dispute man.
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Specifically, can you show why the computer models are in error in the case of the collapse of the WTC?

    If you can, then do so.
     
  13. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yes, they do.

    Do you know what that reason is?

    Were there some flaws in the modeling parameters that you would like to point out?
     
  14. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Yes...please do so...so we can run in circles and begin again. Defending the "official" BS story is indeed circular and not open to honesty or specifics.
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just evidence of any flaws would be fine.

    Got any?
     
  16. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Provide evidence you aren't a bot.
     
  17. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0



    I'm sure Hannity would have had me removed by now if that were the case but, believe what you will, or at least continue to preform the task at hand.
     
  18. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    With you? Been there...done that. It results in the big dance. Not interested in dancing with an agenda.
     
  19. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Good of you to admit you have an agenda. Maybe you should drop it and look at sourced evidence instead. I linked one from an independent (non-Us Government) source a couple of days ago. You seem to be avoiding it.
     
  20. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Ahhh yes...the "spin"...the dance. Good work, once again.


    I told you sir...I only address you specifically, born of pure entertainment value.
    It's impossible to logically combat an "official" agenda. What can I say?
     
  21. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Without any facts on your side, I completely agree.

    Any address to the independent source (non-official) I posted? Didn't think so.
     
  22. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Not to you sir....no fighting an agenda (although strictly for entertainment value...it has it's curiosities).
     
  23. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your agenda is quite clear. Yet you fail to present any evidence whatsoever. Your Excuses? Plenty.
    Your evidence? Zilch.
     
  24. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0



    Very good sir. You win again.
     
  25. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "Sir" should be capitalized.

    ... and I know.
     

Share This Page