Evidence STILL severely lacking for Flight 93 mostly buried claim

Discussion in '9/11' started by suede, Dec 4, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Then why don't you post it?
     
  2. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OK, so you're calling them idiots. Don't you think all those people out there wouldn't notice nothing was being pulled from the hole? Come on. Don't play stupid.

    You haven't proved the reports already submitted are false. Just pretending you're some kind of mind reader and know everyone is lying is NOT proof they are lying. It is just paranoid delusions.

    Yeah. Your "friend" who heard it second hand claimed that. :lol: What kind of proof is that? Would you accept that kind of proof from anyone else? No. So don't expect us to believe your bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

    We have. The people who were there made the report. They photographed the parts pulled from the ground. Not ONE dissenting voice has ever been heard from ANYONE who was there. But we're suppose to believe someone who can't back up their (*)(*)(*)(*) (that would be you) over all the other evidence? I don't think so.

    I am not your lacky. You want to find it? You look.

    Nope. They were very similar.
     
  3. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Leverage. How else am I going to get you guys to post evidence the plane buried that you guys "say" is so plentiful?

    Just look at Pat's last post. A loooong drawn out post with no evidence the plane buried.

    You started to prove the plane buried, then mysteriously abandoned it.

    Question: do you believe most of Flight 93 had buried as Hannibal and Patriot911 do?
     
  4. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Photographs submitted in a Federal District Court and admitted into evidence in the Mousaui trail show plane parts being dug up.

    For some reason, you reject this as evidence.

    The evidence is there, you and a very small minority of people, are simply rejecting it without basis.

    Those are the facts and they are not in dispute.
     
  5. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Leverage??

    BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! :mrgreen:

    Let me get this straight. You have evidence that supports this claim . . .

    yet you state you are withholding it so you can mess with some people on an Internet forum??? :mrgreen:

    That's a good one.
     
  6. cenydd

    cenydd Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    11,335
    Likes Received:
    230
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Since it appears that nobody has any intention of complying with the forum rules on this thread, I am closing it.

    ALL members note this warning about this section of the forum:


    http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/182771-general-warning-about-section.html

    Read it, and read it closely - this kind of behaviour will not be tolerated on the forum, and ALL those responsible for repeating it will find themselves taking the consequences of their actions.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page