I'm curious to see if Prunepicker will prove him/herself any different than ChemEngineer or Yguy. Giving those two the benefit of a doubt that the theory of evolution lacks scientific credibility, neither of them could still put forward scientific evidence to support their own claims. It makes them the same as all the "evolutionists" they love criticizing.
We are 'creators' who were created. Everything we have created came from the basic materials left here by a supreme creator I call God or Heavenly Father.I'm not a religious person and have no denomination but I do believe.
Actually I have proposed evidence that evolution is a hoax.. You nor anyone else have provided solid evidence for evolution, which I understand very well. There have been the usually regurgitation of evolutionary dogma and indoctrination but nothing to honestly show a species becoming another. As far as your quip about "basic molecular biology principles, I'm the only one who is honestly using them. Please feel free to show how a species gradually transitioned into anotherspecies. Of course you won't because you can't. All you have, at best, is extrapolation with artistic renderings. Of course I haven't proved anything. Science, which is all I've used, doesn't prove anything. It never has and as long as it's kept true to it's purpose it never will. If you understood basic science, which your post shows you don't, you would have never made such an unscientific statement.
I blew off nothing. You simply haven't provided any hard evidence of a species gradually transitioning into another species. Not a single thing. Put up or shut up as they say.
Yet you refuse to provide the "much evidence". But that's because you really don't have much evidence, which I've pointed out over and over. Yes, it has. However it's followers who want evolution to be true have fallen incredibly short of doing so.
I've been saying this from the get go. In fact I'm the only one using this information. Science proves nothing. Never has and never will.
Nope. It's entirely based on science. In fact, I don't believe your belief/arguement in evolution is based on science, as per my many posts. It must be based on something else, even if you yourself don't realize it.
Sorry guy. When someone rejects science and can't even specify what they would accept as evidence, I just can't get interested. Have a great rest of your life!
"You're post provides the evidence." You're stuggling with english, get real. You clearly have not taken up anything at all.
It's all around you pard, your endless denial notwithstanding, and it does not require your approval or belief.
This is an incorrect statement. I understand science, biology and the "science" behind evolution. I understand that since you refuse to provide any evidence whatsoever of a species gradually transitioning into another species that you must use red herrings in order to run from the fact that you have nothng to support your desire for evolution to be true.
Just in this one thread many members have provided you with multiple examples of what you request only to have you dismiss it, this is the reason few wish to bother trying anymore. I could show you snakes with residual legs or whales with leg bones inside but you will blow it off again so I wont. Basically it has become so clear that you wont accept anything short of someone showing up at your door and making a fish become a horse that you have become a sad joke told at parties when everyone gets drunk.
I understand that you reject science. If you honestly could defend your claims that species gradually transition into another you would. You can't. I realize that I've shattered your world by asking for scientific evidence. It's a hard pill for you to swallow since you can't provide the evidence I've asked for. I'll await your next post which won't contain any evidence that supports your beliefs and respond with a desire to see the evidence which, once again, you won't provide but will claim you did.
You clearly can't provide any evidence whatsoever of a species gradually transitioning into another species. By the way, you're struggling with your English, not I. Learn to spell.
No, it's not. If it was you'd put up the evidence of a species gradually transitioning into another species. This is the Big Kahuna of evolution. It's the Big Foot. All you have is extrapolation with artistic renderings. Please put up or shut up as they say. I don't expect you to do so because that would require you to honestly produce hard evidence of evolution. Instead, as the others have, you will continue to run from having to do so because you can't do it. If you do attempt to post evidence please cite references and most importantly read what your latest belief will be before posting. So many have had to retire in shame because they only read the headlines and not the articles.
This is a lie. I've not dismissed anything. On the other hand, to those who have attempted to provide examples have neglected to show the transition with science. They've done their "quick google" and only read the headlines in hopes of finding evidence. Alas, they only provided extrapolation and artistic renderings of the usual indoctrination. No you won't. And I won't blow it off. I never have. You, on the other hand, must be scared to death that you'll be wrong or you'd put up the evidence. You have no evidence to support this nonsense. What's worse is that you are so worried of not being able to produce any evidence of a species gradually transitioning into another species. Face the facts. You have nothing or you'd put it up. Good grief.
They have provided evidence. But you want proof. Evolution is a theory. It hasn't been proven. It is a reasonable explanation of the natural world based on observation. The evolution from one species to another requires more time than humans have existed. Therefore, no proof. Only theory. It is what it is.
You lie as usual. He want evidence of transitional species, not a proof. On each of 43 pages he has been told by religious fanatics that he was provided the evidence. Once in a while they post a cartoon and say - this is a scientific evidence, watch. What is his interest to watch cartoons and argue to religious fanatics I don't know.
