Eric Trump reveals HE told Donald FBI raided Mar-a-Lago: Ex-President's son claims agents 'ransacked

Then why didn't they issue a subpoena for them?

Then why didn't they do as they were offered and ask for them and come and get them?

Who is this informant? Did the FBI have a plant in the home of the former President and were spying on him? REALLY. Do you have any idea the precedent THAT is going to set? And just because a piece of paper has "Top Secret" stamped on it does jot mean it is STILL top secret. As President he could declassify any document he wanted to and even share it. What was this top secret document and was then information even still classified and pertinent to any current or related time national security?

And the DOJ should clear it up IMMEDIATELY instead of trying to set up something the Dwms.ccan use to attack him and those he supports in the upncoming elections. Don't you find it curious that they held the search warrant for two months over this "national security threat" until the 91st day before the midterms? The day before they said they refrain from anything that could effect the election?

I don't know any of those that have any more than anyone else has ever had on him. Thst is nothing. And I don't see what theybhave hear as far as doc's. I have said thisnis jot about that. They wanted to go a search through everything hoping to find Jan 6 information or anything else they could find.

Of spare me I've been hearing that going on SEVEN YEARS............

 

Does it suck knowing you adore a treasonous piece of ****?

 

Still trying to make this email catchphrase happen?

LOL, bless your heart.

 

Enjoy your day. I can only tolerate a little bit of a bore. (Buy a lighter).

 

Yea let's leave this hanging for two more years of LOOK HE'S A CROOK like all the other smoke and mirror allegations.

They could come out right now with a much more informative briefing and justification for this sudden escalation of what had been a normal negotiation concerning presidential records.

And if in fact the FBI had a mole living in hisbhouse to engage surveillance of him we got a WHOLE 'NOTHER set of issues.

 

By Ovie. Hope you find some good ointment bruh.

 

Talking about 20,000,how many of those 20,000 Mules have been indicted?

Considering all the evidence D'Louza has I would think by now at least 5-600.

 

Sure... the lawyer signed that document because the client lied (withheld) to his lawyer about having documents in the safe....

The key phrase is "in the boxes".... too generic...

 

Jesus, you just keep jumping from conspiracy to conspiracy. LOL

 

Who's responsible for lying to the FBI?

 

This is not normal. There’s no other president who has done this.
If there is an informant close to trump, that’s a VERY good reason to keep the affidavit sealed.

 

Shhhhhhhh. It's more funny that rightists actually believe that nonsense and throw their money away on that platter of dogshit. LOL

 

Doubt it... they seem happy with their decision....

 

he, for one, did not take nuclear documents

but two, he did it properly, he did not commit a crime, Obama followed procedures

 

Do you think the DOJ can’t charge anyone if the last admin didn’t? You know that’s a ridiculous excuse right?

 

This is why Condors posts are my absolute favorite. I always am guaranteed a tremendous chuckle reading them. LOL

 

It almost always falls on the client... but I'll grab some popcorn if it comes down to she said(lawyer)/she said (T****)

The FBI should have had T**** sign the document in June....he was in the building, if not participating in the actual discussion....

That would have taken the mystery out of it...

 

The made those statements the next day.
But wasn't it the left claiming Trump wouldn't agree to release the sealed warrants?
And we all saw how that turned out.

 

What part of Hillary destroyed all the evidence went over you head?

 

Dude, Trump hasn't released ****. LMAO

 

I finally bailed on that guy, as amusing as he is....

Who can forget the infamous Arizona Senate thread from January??

Still, too much purposeful misinformation for my taste....

If he ever has anything useful to say, let me know.....

 

1. Yes. He was lying. The thought to claim that the documents were magically declassified suddenly came to him over a year and a half of simply not returning the documents? BS, and there's a process to declassification, you can't just snap your fingers. Moreover, and importantly, let's assume that the Orange Fabricator isn't lying yet again....declassification does NOT mean you can just take the documents. They never belonged to the Orange Burglar to begin with.
2. What's "bald-faced" about a legally obtained search and seizure order? Are you suggesting that Team Orange gets to steal and hide documents without any justification at all?
3. What was the Orange Bowel doing with the documents? What were his plans? Fire starters? Conversation starters? WTF was he going to do with them?

 

innocent until proved guilty right, same as Trump, show me where she was found guilty of such

 

Profanity is useful. It allows the writer to display depth of feeling.

 

Back on topic.
Like they made those statements the "next day:" before Garland addressed the nation?
I want the link where they made those statements after Garland addressed the nation.
See how that works?