FBI Scandal: Deep State Corruption Of FBI, Justice Was There From Very Start Of Hillary Email Probe

Yep, the fix was in from the get-go to make sure she won the election. Never has the FBI or DOJ been so politicized and corrupt. And now the ducks begin to quack as they start facing criminal prosecutions with lots of prison time for convictions.

FBI Scandal: Deep State Corruption Of FBI, Justice Was There From Very Start Of Hillary Email Probe

Deep State: Were the Justice Department and FBI corrupted by their efforts to protect Hillary Clinton and her future chances at the presidency? Recent revelations suggest the answer is an unqualified yes, and now those who cooperated may soon feel the law's sting for doing so.

Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe may be the worst off. In addition to possible charges for lying under oath for denying that he leaked information to the Wall Street Journal (in large part dfto answer swirling rumors in the journalistic community), it's alleged that he ordered FBI agents working on the Clinton Foundation investigation to stand down.

Now, evidence suggests he told the FBI's Washington field office to also "stand down" from its investigation of Clinton's private-email server. That investigation followed a New York Times piece that appeared in 2015, detailing Hillary Clinton's possible illegal use of an unsecured, home-brew email server for her official business as secretary of state. It appears to be a clear violation of the law.

"Multiple former FBI officials, along with a Congressional official, say that while there may have been internal squabbling over the FBI's investigation into the Clinton Foundation at the time, there was allegedly another 'stand-down' order by McCabe regarding the opening of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of her private email for official government business," wrote independent journalist Sarah Carter.

That's two stand-down orders, if you're counting, that McCabe made. That he would intervene twice on behalf of Clinton suggests not an abundance of caution but that he had political qualms rather than merely procedural ones.......


........But former FBI chief James Comey isn't far behind McCabe.

Comey opposed the idea of a special counsel to investigate Hillary Clinton's egregious misuse of her email system — which, intelligence experts say, likely exposed U.S. classified material to both the Russian and Chinese intelligence agencies — despite substantial evidence of a crime.

Why? Because, he wrote, the main reason for appointing a special counsel would have been because there were serious questions about then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch's ability to be unbiased — especially after the unplanned, unrecorded and highly curious half-hour meeting she had with Bill Clinton while sitting in a jet plane at the Phoenix airport.

Comey, ever chivalrous, said naming a special counsel "would have been unfair to Hillary Clinton."

But, as Aaron Klein of Breitbart news writes, "Comey, however hand no problem taking actions to ensure a special prosecutor in the case of Donald Trump and unsubstantiated claims of Russian collusion based in part on charges made inside a largely-discredited dossier financed by Clinton''s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee."

Exactly. One kind of justice for Hillary, another kind of justice for Trump.

This is the same man, by the way, said he shared memos of his conversations with a "friend" in order to ensure that they were made public — a prima facie violation of the law, given that those memos are not personal property, but belong to the FBI.

This was made even worse by this week's revelation by Fox News that Comey's "friend," Columbia Law Professor Daniel Richman, had been made a "Special Employee" at the FBI that gave him access to the building and, presumably, to Comey's office.

This is far more real, and far more detailed, than any of the so far fanciful accounts of supposed Trump-Russian collusion, which is now nearing its second year of being investigated with no results................

...........Ironic, isn't it, that the real "collusion" all along seems to be among those who are themselves investigating Trump.



Increasingly, the supposed case of "Trump-Russia collusion" is morphing into a case of "FBI-Justice Department-Clinton collusion." With the many elements finally coming together just as the mid-term congressional elections get underway, we could be in for a bumpy ride this summer.

 

Just now, nearly 49 pages of brand new text messages between Strzok and Page have been released. They were supposed to represent the 6 months of "missing" texts previously withheld by the FBI. However, due to the infrequency of the texts they appear to be incomplete so the FBI is still not forthcoming. Now Strzok is in the Personnel department and lo! Comey's leak-friend the Professor was an "unpaid employee" all along! Can anyone explain what an "unpaid employee" is? Does that mean he has an off-shore account? Money laundering? What was his position title, classification and job description?

• Andrew McCabe lied under oath to IG
• Comey appears to have committed perjury
• James Clapper lied to congress
• John Brennan lied to congress
• Cheryl Mills and Huma Abadin committed perjury
• Comey and DOJ mislead FISA judge

 

Lets hope we finally get a proper investigation and these people go to jail for their abuse of power. Did youvhear Comey last night on Fox. He still doesn't know who paid for the dossier but he used it to get the FISA warrant. WHAT?? Its OK for him and his cronies to lie but not everyone else. WHAT???

 

In one interview, he said he knew but didn't think he needed to tell Trump when he informed him of the dossier, then he tried to say the Republicans paid for it (actually the origin of the document has been traced back to a guy on Diane Feinstein's staff), then he said he didn't know. He is either very stupid or mentally ill.

He is also uncomfortably worm-like.

 

Deep State....lol...Still hunting Clinton's eh? Deep State, Deep State...the sky is fallen g...

 

Are you a Russian collusion pot meet kettle kinda of fella?

 

You know, sometimes I wonder if there are so many laws that politicians practically almost can't help but break some of them. Laws always have some inherent degree of ambiguity to them, that people can't always predict that what they do is breaking the law. That's why I believe it is appropriate to only go after the most serious clear violations of the law, especially when it could potentially affect the political process. If you had some impartial artificial intelligence supercomputer that was really a stickler for the law, I bet it would put half the politicians in prison.

 

No, but I do find it hilarious that the new GOP is on a full out attack on those career law enforcement agents who are trying to protect our election process from foreign spy agencies. Hannity acts like a guy on the Kremlin payroll. Maybe Cohen negotiated his contract with Putin. Nothing would surprise me at this point.

 

All unfounded accusations which have been forwarded by phony news agencies like Fox and the Russian trolls who have infested our social media....

 

This is all more proof that passing another law doesn't magically stop something from happening.

There are all sorts of potential complications when trying to actually enforce these laws. They could interfere with the running of government and the smooth function of democracy.

People and legislators rarely think about this though. They think just passing a law against something is enough to stop it from happening, and the courts will just smooth out all the details, no worries.

 

How many do you think will be convicted of anything? What really needs to happen is something on the order of a no BS Nuremberg style trial with actual convictions and appropriate sentencing.

 

That reminds me of a joke my Dad used to ask me as we drove by a graveyard. "How many dead people do you think are buried there?" Answer, all of them.

But the most important thing will be that justice prevails and the people are FINALLY given confidence that government corruption ends NOW.

Steve

 

Unfounded accusations ? Like Russian collusion ?

 

That the best you got?

 

I can't figure if he is the fool or he just believes the American people are a bunch of fools.

 

They were cooperating with Russian agencies trying to effect the election and using their political positions to try and effect the election.

 

He is a fool, monumentally incompetent, narcissistic.... and I suspect his bully-wife pastes her estrogen patches on him.