Discussion in 'United States' started by HB Surfer, Jan 25, 2019.
I saw this.
Didn't know it was you.
Now That's funny. Maybe if you go to a rally he or his staff can autograph it you?
Point out where I've used CNN or the NYT as a source in this thread.
Go ahead, I'll wait...
You'll need to wait till I find them if you are unwilling or unable to provide them.
Er no it doesn't. Perjury is LYING under oath.
As to no closer to his mandate. Surely you jest.
Doubt the husband was in the AF bus they were using to ditch trump when he stopped them. He might have had plans to join up with later. He has tagged along on a lot of her trips. That is a fact according to Air Force records.
You'll be wasting your time in this thread, but go ahead.
Link, please - blogs and QAnon verbal masturbating don't count...
Stone's defense: Only false statements are perjury. False testimony that results from confusion, lapse of memory, or mistake is not perjury. Conflicts in testimony may be perjury if one of the conflicting statements is necessarily false (and prosecutors can prove perjury without proving which one is false).
Perjury traps are what Mueller and co. have been using. They play dirty with unethical, technical tactics that may be possible to dispute if one has the money to fight government lawyers with unlimited budgets.
Apparently Mueller is in the wrap-up phase, and he didn't charge Stone with conspiracy.
Shocking, ain't it.
See #292. Her record of flying and their expenses is recorded by the AF.
The reich-wing echo has rotted your brain. Still waiting for a link to those records. Remember - blogs and QAnon verbal masturbating don't count...
What you got was published in the WSJ and the records were obtained by Judicial Watch from FOIA
record requests. Snopes is biased garbage. I would believe PolitiFact but not your other Fake.org BS
Then a link should be no problem for you. Show your work - your opinion is worthless. You don't bring feelings to a facts fight.
Tip: have fun here don't be a jerk. I gave you a source with a link. Do you have a subscription the Wall Street Journal?
No, you've provided a single blog post. Your unforgivably sloppy posting is your problem, if you want to be taken the least bit seriously.
Source. Your. Argument.
You have zero credibility unless you do. It's just your opinion, otherwise, and opinions are like *******s - everyone has one and most of 'em stink to high heaven.
PS - I am having fun here. Tying Cult45ers in knots brings a smile to my face.
Source doc: https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/weekly-update-air-pelosi-exposed/
I'm done with you
Like I said, LYING is a criminal offense. confusion, memory lapse or "honest mistakes" are not lying. Stone is lying outright. He is guilty of obstruction of justice (witness tampering) and they got him cold on that one.
And no they weren't using "perjury traps". The indictment clearly demonstrate that they have documentary evidence of outright deceit.
I think it only fair to say that you being brought in on this case was not my idea.
According to your unnamed horse **** source
Top line is a link - and the post is loaded with them. Knock yourself out. Or don't. The choice is entirely yours.
Hint: When the text changes color and the pointer turns to this, that means that there is a link you can click on. Avail yourself of it.
The judges can only go by what is presented to them. The judge takes their word that the dossier is a valid document. He doesn't know that the Democrats paid for it and it wasn't never intended as intelligence...but instead as political left wing propaganda. He doesn't know that Steele was trying to peddle it to the press to influence the election. He doesn't know the agents who dressed it up said "f trump" and talked about "insurance policies" to stop Trump. These judges don't know any of that because that information was hidden from them. In a setting such as this it's vitally important that exculpatory evidence is presented, if it exists, because the target has no way of defending himself. The were hell bent on targeting Page and getting at all his communications with others in the campaign. This was the vehicle to do it. It's quite sickening.
No in the Trump campaign was involved in that. Let's deal in facts here, not left wing conspiracies.
Wait. But the indictment came out of the Uranium One INVESTIGATION. Your ilk have said that even if the primary matter being investigated doesn't turn up any indictments just the fact that the investigation does automatically means guilt for the main target initially. Trying to talk out of both sides of your mouth again?
Separate names with a comma.