FLAT EARTH RANT #4 Did He Do It Again?

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by jrr777, Apr 4, 2017.

  1. jrr777

    jrr777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2015
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You have not done nothing but give mathematical equations as evidence. While it is evidence, it's not evidence that leads to proof. One can even have real good evidence (non mathematical), and still not be enough for proof (OJ). So get over yourself, you have done nothing to prove it's a ball other than kneel to your "high counsel", and repeat what they say. You can have that!!!

    Matter of fact if you was never taught the ball earth, you would go your entire life and never even think of it. Because all your senses suggest otherwise.

    You have no mind of your own, your mind is owned by high counsel, govt, scientists, anything but your own. Congratulations!!!
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2017
  2. ibobbrob

    ibobbrob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    6,145
    Likes Received:
    1,742
    Trophy Points:
    113

    The earth is flat and I don't care what you say. Especially on the California side.
     
    jrr777 likes this.
  3. jrr777

    jrr777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2015
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83
    A good reason for such a conspiracy huh? Tell you what, you actually take some time (even a little) and think what are the results of this conspiracy, how does or did it effect mankind, who gained from it, and what mindset does instill into our minds? Just think for yourself.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2017
  4. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    14,149
    Likes Received:
    1,460
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong I have given much more evidence than simply mathematics.

    U have shown you photographic evidence which you know is real and you simply lie about it calling it fake. I have pointed out how YOU can see it dark on one side of the world while it is day light on another and you simply lied about that evidence.

    the thing about lies is that you know when you are lying.

    You know you are wrong.
     
  5. DarkDaimon

    DarkDaimon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Messages:
    4,746
    Likes Received:
    915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Typical of those that don't have an answer. Lay the burden of proof on the person asking the question, that way you don't actually have to answer the question.
     
  6. jrr777

    jrr777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2015
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Your the one claiming it's a ball without proof. I don't need to prove what's observable. You need to prove what's not observable. Or continue your blind faith.
     
  7. Skruddgemire

    Skruddgemire Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2017
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    341
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
  8. jrr777

    jrr777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2015
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You are getting nowhere with me. All your alleged proof is not proof at all. Your a broken record, always on repeat. Perhaps it would be best for you, that when you see the words "flat earth", you simply don't click on it. If you refuse to look into it, why do you click on it? You need a flat earther to do the research for you. If your going to argue a matter, know both sides. Otherwise the ignorance is on you. That would be like me trying to do surgery on somebody, not having a clue what I was doing. Only in this case, you have no clue what your saying.

    See I know both sides, I know the heliocentric model better than most who just simply "believe" it. And they can't even answer simple questions. Such as, how far is the moon, the sun, the closest star? Is gravity theory or fact, where did the model originate from, who was involved? Or what is the IDL (international date line) and how many times has it been changed? How many nations had two of the same days (Friday) in a row. What was the purpose, why was the calendar changed from a more accurate (Luni Calendar) to the Julian Calendar and on to the Gregorian calendar? What was operation Highjump, operation fishbowl, operation mocking bird, the Antarctica treaty and which nations are involved, who started the NASA program, what was profited, who was involved? Flat earth is much deeper than "flat earth". And has a significant change on mankind's thought process or mindset of "reality". For we are all operating a system that was designed and setup specifically for the "powers that be".

    I was huge fan of "space", watching all the tv shows (science and history channel), Morgan Freeman "Through the Wormhole", "The Universe", "Secrets of the Cosmos", I can go on and on. I DVR every episode of them, more than I have listed here. I watched space shows like most Americans watch, News, CSI, Americas Got Talent, all the hit shows etc. And after looking into flat earth, I couldn't help but notice all of those shows only used computer graphics to show "space", none not one was real. It was as if they really didn't have anything up there to take pictures or videos and that's why all these t.v. shows are computer graphics. From supernova's to blackholes, all of it was done with computers. And you can verify this yourself. But you won't, you'll simply ramble on with the belief system that has been indoctrinated unto you.
     
  9. jrr777

    jrr777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2015
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83

    Mocking and ridicule is your argument. This is the attitude of ball earthers, why.........because it's their religion. And you know how people get when their religion is messed with. Your "space" is simply a belief and you should be able to figure that out, seems how all of it is in your head. You have seen none of it, nor ever will, thus it's all in your head. Just as they intended. So please continue with your willful ignorance.
     
  10. Skruddgemire

    Skruddgemire Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2017
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    341
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Why can't a person see beyond 2-3 miles at sea level but at 100 feet up (say a 10 story building) they can see 12 miles?

    Why when a ship on the horizon steams towards shore you first see the top of the superstructure then as it gets closer you can finally see the bow? You'd think that the bow which is closer would be seen sooner than say...a Nimitz-Class Carrier's island which is in the middle of the ship.

    Why can we not see the sun at night when if it's on a flat plane simply off in the distance? Why do the stars change positions during each of the seasons?

    We ask these questions of you and you mock the living **** out of us for asking them. And you're honestly surprised when we mock you back?
     
  11. Skruddgemire

    Skruddgemire Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2017
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    341
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    They did shows about dinosaurs using computer graphics. Does this mean that dinosaurs aren't real? They use CGI to show how a baby develops in the womb. Does that mean that babies don't exist? They use CGI to demonstrate atomic interactions and chemical bonds. Does chemistry not exist?
     
  12. Skruddgemire

    Skruddgemire Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2017
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    341
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Actually it's not my argument. I stopped arguing with you 'round about the third time you mocked everyone else for asking questions. Besides that facepalm wasn't mocking...

    [​IMG]

    That's...mocking.
     
    Electron likes this.
  13. jrr777

    jrr777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2015
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83
  14. Skruddgemire

    Skruddgemire Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2017
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    341
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    14,149
    Likes Received:
    1,460
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You do not know anything at all especially about science.

    Yes gravity is a fact and no they do not CGI the images from NASA which you merely lie about.

    I am repetitive because you repeatedly lie
     
  16. jrr777

    jrr777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2015
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Show me an image of a celestial body that is not CGI (moon and sun is not allowed). Go ahead, I will rip it apart with systematic ease. Go ahead show me one.

    https://ncse.com/library-resource/gravity-its-only-theory

    https://www.newscientist.com/round-up/seven-things-that-dont-make-sense-about-gravity

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_physics

    Fact: You don't sh()() and only run your mouth as if you do. Science is a process, it's that simple. To claim I don't anything about science is childish, but that's because you have no argument. So you fall back on name calling. Keep showing your childish behavior, lets see where it leads.
     
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2017
  17. Electron

    Electron Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,934
    Likes Received:
    1,107
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is my most popular FE video, on armillary sundials. I reviewed it yesterday, and there are things about these sundials that falsify FE claims. At 6am and 6pm, light enters the sundial horizontally. If the Earth was flat and the Sun 3000 miles high, sunlight could never enter the sundial in a direction parallel to the Earth's surface.

    At 5am and 7pm, sunlight would have to be pointing up toward the (3k mi high) Sun. That's obviously impossible, and is yet another debunking of flat Earth claims.

    Check it out, it's just 6 minutes long:
     
  18. jrr777

    jrr777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2015
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I do appreciate the science you have given, and your polite words. However this is not what's happening.

    http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/

    http://library.tfes.org/library/Sea-Earth Globe.pdf

     
  19. jrr777

    jrr777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2015
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I have no idea how I got your questions so small in the green, and mine in the green as well....srry bout that.
     
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2017
  20. jrr777

    jrr777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2015
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83
    No disrespect but think about what your saying here. All these can be observed by you and I. I watched my daughter's birth, so in seeing a birth on television I can determine it's absolutely fake. This is not the case for "space". It only exists in our minds to begin with, based off CGI, artist rendition or composites. There is no real image whatsoever for comparison. Same with dinosaurs, they may have the bones, but that doesn't determine what they looked like. That only comes from our imagination. Such as "space".
     
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2017

Share This Page