Flight 93 recovered underground?

The claim was made in the OP about an official account. Where is this official account?

Link please.

 

Where is this claim made? Link, please.

 

The official story supporters don't even know the official story. I love it!

 

Yup, you would think they'd have tons of photos like they do of Valujet 592 and TWA 800, since the events of 9/11 is compared to Pearl Harbor in it's historical significance.

 

The claim was made in the OP about an official account. Where is this official account?

Link please.

 

Yes, I've seen that engine photo prior. That the one that was a half mile away, or the one that was underground?

The fuselage. Where was that exactly? Underground or half mile away? Got anything relevant to that missi..I mean..plane hole?

 

Fantastic! Let's see the plane parts i the trees! (I'm assuming those would be part of the smaller percentage of plane parts that wasn't buried underground?)
Something next to the claimed plane's hole would be appreciated. Thanks!

 

So now bad weather is being blamed for what was or wasn't found? Couldn't they wait until the weather cleared?

 

Certainly seems that way. I'm trying to give them the chance to prove the claim, but, it looks futile.

"Flight 93 recovered underground?"

That was the OP, wasn't it?

 

Hot potato. Hot potato. LOL

 

That was the strawman argument from the OP.

 

Maybe they've all been confiscated too?

 

Why do you need to lie and obfuscate? You should read the entire article next time truthseeker, so maybe you could avoid such stupid questions.

 

This is a fine example of a logical fallacy that you Truthers are constantly guilty of.

Your particular claim is unfounded and has nothing to back it up, in fact, you base your entire world view on such "reasoning".

The particular fallacy you're guilty of here is called the Loaded Question.

Just so we don't get confused and report this again as a "personal attack", which it wasn't, I highlighted the most common example of pointing out this type of fallacy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question


Your question was a fine example of this, as are many of your other "questions". Therefore, it should be obvious why they aren't taken seriously by others.

 

It does look futile because obviously the skeptics don't have any evidence to back up that most of the 757 was in the ground. In their desperation, they are trying to make it sound like that's not even the official story.

I almost feel sorry for them.

 

I was making a point. Funny watching you take it another way and trying to run with it somewhere!

PS: got any evidence Flight 93 recovered underground?

 

Yes, you're really good at making "points", facts appear to allude you though. It was pretty funny you reported that, although, it should come as no surprise that common logical fallacies allude you.

PS: try asking coherent questions

 

Pretty funny the Mod agreed with me.

Do the "Got Milk?" commercials confuse you too?

What disingenuous Truther arguments?

 

This is at least the 3rd time (maybe 4th) time you've made a post which referenced an infraction against me that you initiated in an attempt to bait me.

 

So if you're conspiracy theory is true, you fell for my baiting 3 (maybe 4) times?!

What disingenuous Truther arguments?


PS: Got evidence Flight 93 recovered underground? (Think of the "Got Milk?" commercials if you're confused about what I'm asking.)

 

No, just getting it on the public record. Keep on keeping on.

Got covered

 

Got covered, what?


PS: Got evidence Flight 93 recovered underground?

 

Got Covered. Think of the "Got Milk?" commercials if you're confused about what I'm saying.

 

Oh I did and I'm still confused about what you're saying. Please, explain what you mean as if I were a simpleton.


PS: Got evidence Flight 93 recovered underground?

 

Rinse, repeat.